To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

SK, Proto & Armstrong socket comparison

cbracer

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
637
Location
Costa Mesa, CA
For this comparison, three different manufacturers were selected. SK, Armstrong (similar to Craftsman) and Proto. All three are considered to be under the main top level brands of Snap-On, MAC and MATCO. They can be found online with decent discounts making them more affordable. The sets chosen for comparison were 3/8" deep 12 point. These are the hardest to manufacture, and as such should potentially show the most defects.

Before we begin, a word about detents. The detent is the ball and groove mechanism that keeps the socket on the ratchet. I discovered there are two different sizes of detent balls. The Craftsman ratchets all have small detent balls, while most others are large detent balls. This can create a problem with sockets that have large detent grooves when used on ratchets with a small detent balls. There is a noticeable amount of play as the sockets moves end to end. The opposite situation will always be safe as a small or large detent groove fits tightly with ratchets featuring large detent balls. So this is really only a concern when using Craftsman ratchets.

Note end to end play caused by the detent is different than normal wobble play which all sockets had. Wobble play is at an angle to the axis and most noticeable along the square drive sides. This is also different from rotational play if the square drive is not tight enough. All sockets tested here were relatively tight and very similar for wobble and rotational clearance.

The main reason for chrome is to prevent rust. When the chroming process doesn't go well, small defects exist and rust will grow. Almost all defects occur inside the socket where chrome is more difficult to adhere. When defects are found, most US companies will simply paint the inside to provide rust protection rather than rechrome it as the rest of the world does. Paint can scrape off as steel is harder than the paint itself, and this leads to rust . Sockets that are used often enough will get covered in grease to prevent most rust from forming.

Please excuse the quality of the photos. My full size camera broke and all I had was my point and shoot.

SK in front, Proto in the middle, Armstrong on the back row.
all sockets.JPG

all sockets2.JPG



SK

SKset.JPG


Chrome:
Advertised to have the best chrome, the SK set surely didn't have as good of chrome on the outside as the Proto set. It was shinier than the Armstrong, but more inconsistent. One socket had lots of specs in the outer surface. SK chrome was far better at penetrating the inside compared to the Proto.


Paint:
Three of the sockets were painted inside, but none in the working surface of the points. 11, 16, 18mm shown in 2nd picture above.

Rust: A couple suffered from rust.
skrust.JPG
skrust2.JPG


Inside: The smaller sizes suffered most from off-center drilled relief inside the socket. One had a large sliver sticking out inside. It doesn't effect function, but clearly shows lack of consistency in manufacturing. Another socket had the broaching left inside.
skbad1.JPG
skbad3.JPG


Size Markings: All sizes were stamped deep enough to be read easily, though some confusion exists from the other writing between the top and bottom lines/grooves. The SK text was as large as the size, while the part number and USA were slightly smaller. It would be more clear if the SK was smaller like the part number and spaced further away from the size!

Detents: The detents on the SK sockets are small, though some looked too small only because they weren't cut as deep. Detent depths were the most inconsistent of the group. One socket had very small detents, but all of them were there. One socket was nicely chromed in the detent area, but all others featured shavings or flashing left around the cut detent and un-chromed.
skdetent.JPG


Double Blanks: Some sockets are made from the same blank stamping. For example, the 17mm and 18mm have identical outside diameters but used for two different sizes. Not something I like.

Broach Depth: The shortest broaching depth.


Socket Height:
Three different heights are found on the SK deep set. From 16mm and up they are equal in length to the Armstrong but shorter than the Proto. Below 16mm the sockets are much shorter.

Problem Sockets going back for warranty:
9mm - broach left inside and not drilled out. Stress lines/cracks inside
10mm - rust in two spots. Large shaving left hanging inside
11mm - lots of pits in the chrome
15mm - rust in a corner of the square drive



Armstrong (Craftsman easy read sockets are made by Armstrong)
Armstrongset.JPG

Chrome: The chrome is consistent but darker than the others. Many call this a nickle plating or nickel-chrome. The chrome penetrates inside the socket quite nicely.

Paint:
None show any signs of paint inside.

Rust: Can be a problem with Armstrong or Craftsman. Some will have rust initially, and likely most will develop rust over time. As proven by my 7 year old Craftsman set. The square drive area is most susceptible.
This picture you can see rust spots, but the camera white balance doesn't shows them as dark spots rather than red spots.
AM_CM.JPG


Inside:
The 12pt sockets have lots of specs of metal, like sand-paper on the inner sides. Not sure why or how this happens, but they are rough. It seems to be impossible to remove, and if you did then the chrome finish would be compromised. My older Craftsman set has the same sand-paper like finish. Most 6pt sockets seem fine.
Below is an SK socket on the left showing the shallow broach, and the Armstrong on the right showing the specs of metal.
AM_CM2.JPG


Size Markings:
Armstrong sockets feature the laser etching of sizes clearly on the socket. Sizes are also stamped on the bottom so essentially dual marked and getting the best of both worlds. The stamping on the bottom is not very deep. (Craftsman brand have laser etching or stamping on the bottom, but not both).

Detents:
The sockets are cut for a small detent ball, which works equally as well on large and small detent ball ratchets. These are the "double detents" which some dislike and others like. I have no reason to dislike them. All but one fit tightly and perfectly. That one was cut too long and gave more end to end play on rachets with a small detent ball. Large detent ball ratches were better on this problem socket.
Below the Armstrong socket on the left, and a Craftsman on the right which has rusted over the last 7 years of little use.
AM_CM_rust.JPG


Double Blanks:
None of the sockets share the same blanking size. Shows that Armstrong didn't cut any corners when designing the socket. However the 8mm and 9mm are very very close.

Broach Depth:
Armstrong sockets feature the deepest broaching for super long nut retention.

Socket Height: All of the deep sockets have the same length. Very nice. Many companies make smaller ones for smaller sizes to save money.

Problem Sockets going back for warranty:
8mm - slightly taller than the rest but not going back for warranty
14mm - inside covered in rust
15mm - a little rust inside
18mm - specks of rust inside
19mm - detent was cut too long leading to excess play on the rachet



Proto

Protoset.JPG

Chrome:
The absolute best chrome on the outside. However, the chrome didn't reach all the way inside or as far as the SK set. The insides were still plated just not chrome.

Paint:
None of the sockets had painting inside.

Rust:
None of them showed any signs of rust.

Inside: All were clean, and drilled out nicely.

Size Markings:
Size engravings are plenty deep enough. Brand, part number and USA are listed in smaller text height. Some sockets had different text size heights compared to others. The sizes are shown directly after the part number and brand which makes them harder to find. More spacing between the size and the part numbers would be a welcomed change!
Prototext.JPG


Detents:
Detents were nicely cut, and very similar in size for all the sockets. Two of them were cut too far inside, limiting the ability for the socket to properly lock onto the detent ball of the ratchet. Left one cut too far down.
Protodetent.JPG


Double Blanks:
Some sockets are made from the same stampings. For example, the 15mm and 16mm have identical outside diameters but are cut for the two different sizes.

Broach Depth:
Broaching depth is good, not the most or the least out of the bunch.

Socket Height:
Two sizes in length exist, one shorter than the Armstrong, and the other taller than the Armstrong.

Problem Sockets going back for warranty:
15mm - detent cut too far inside, won't lock on some ratchets
19mm - same as above


Conclusion
I will be contacting each company about warranty tomorrow, reporting back how well each one does. Overall I like the Proto sockets the best. There are many brands and I don't have time or money to compare them all. There is a lot of talk about wanting American tools, but to be honest I don't see the quality (Snap-On, MAC, MATCO excluded) currently available from Europe, Japan and even Taiwan.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Super Sport

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 30, 2011
Messages
4,081
Location
West Michigan
Two things:

Craftsman does offer dual-marked sockets, something you mention they do not.

You do not test the tolerances of the sockets nor how well they hold up under stress. Both are important features, arguably a lot more important than some qualities you focused on.

Other than that, an excellent comparison and great insight. I would have liked to see a truck brand included, but understand why they were not.
 

Skin

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
11,713
Location
Boston
most US companies will simply paint the inside to provide rust protection rather than rechrome it as the rest of the world does.

This is incorrect. German sockets are also painted inside.

While i applaud the effort threads like these tak I too would of liked to see some meaningful information such as measurements and surface contact area if possible. As someone who actually uses their tools essentially on a daily basis i couldnt help but roll my eyes at the mention of warranty replacement for a little rust inside a socket. Its tools, not jewelry.
 
Last edited:

sk farmer

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
5,556
Location
nd
decent info but i don't get your correlation between shorter sockets being made shorter to save money. sk has always used those lengths of sockets, i often have seen that as an advantage. why do you think the cman mid depth sockets sell immediately when offered? if i am correct sk does offer those smaller sizes in a longer socket, just not in that set.
 

cgv69

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
1,033
Location
Boone Co., KY
I always have mixed feelings about threads like this. One the one hand I applaud the effort to give a real, side by side comparison which is better then the typical, "Brand A is the best because that is what I bought and they were perfect" but that said, you really can't make any accurate conclusions from this.

This is mostly a visual comparison which does not take into account some very critical distinctions can not be ascertained simply by looking at them. What material are these sockets made from? What manufacturing methods were used to produce them? What is their Rockwell hardness rating? Have they been stress tested and if so, what is their stress rating? Etc.. Honestly I've seen some Asian chrome that looked 10x better then anything I've seen from your typical American company including SO but a better chrome job does not = a better tool

Another problem here is sample size. One set of each isn't really a fair indication typical product quality. If you buy 5 different sets from Company A and Set #1 comes with 3 defective sockets but Sets 2-5 are all perfect, which would you say is more common? But what if for the sake of this test you were only handed set #1?

One other point is, do yo know when the SK set was made? From what I understand, SK tools made in the new plant under Ideals ownership are much better then SK tools made in the recent past but there is a still a lot of per-ideal product sitting on shelves. Can you say which "SK" made that set?
 

cderalow

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Messages
1,326
Location
Potomac, MD
I will tell you this. I own a lot of armstrong sockets (full 1/4" in both SAE & metric, full 3/8" SAE, Full 1/2" SAE & Metric, shallow 3/8" metric)...

The quality of all is extremely consistent.
 

Mr Ratchet

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
928
Location
Michigan
Good post, and thanks for your time and effort. While it may not have all of the details of a full blown comparison, it's at least offered for free.

I like the Armstrongs because of their larger size ID, deeper broaching (some full length) , and consistent heights. Notice that SK and proto does not agree as to what size to start the height step down. I guess if I wanted a mid length socket, I'd buy some sets. In this price range of sockets, I'd more than likely go with Blue Points if I had to to do it over again.
 

lowbucktruck

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
1,323
Location
Foothills, Northern California
Thank you for taking the time to do this comparison. Perhaps a follow-up series of tests would be in order (stress test, etc). There is more to a good socket than just the chrome plating. I have both older S-K and Proto socket sets that I use, and I know how tough those Proto sockets are.
However, this comparison between S-K, Armstrong and Proto may help someone here when making a purchase decision on a socket set. (we are a bunch of critics here, no doubt)

I do agree that it is important to note whether the S-K socket set in this comparison is pre-Ideal product inventory or from current production. The old S-K company had some quality control issues with their manufacturing before the Ideal acquisition (and it shows). Some of my old S-K Wayne sockets looked better than the new S-K stuff before Ideal reinvented S-K as a manufacturer.
 
Last edited:
OP
C

cbracer

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
637
Location
Costa Mesa, CA
> This is mostly a visual comparison
You do not test the tolerances of the sockets nor how well they hold up under stress. Both are important features, arguably a lot more important than some qualities you focused on.
Yes this is a visual comparison! I also agree that strength and tolerance is important. But do you actually think these companies are making sockets that are going to fail in normal use? No. Do you think these companies are using bad quality steel? No. These brands and their sockets will work wonderfully, and none of these sockets will likely fail in what I'm going to put them through. Sure there will come a stuck bolt sometime and then that will test their strength. That type of debate is in many other threads. What has annoyed me the most is how visually crappy so many US companies make their tools. Some of the things I found should have never gotten through QC. Now if we are comparing Taiwan, China and other tools, sure strength, hardness, material quality would be something that has to be tested. I'm assuming that top US companies are using quality steel.

There is a valid comparison to consider in terms of play and the tightness of a socket on the square drive, but all three companies here were actually so similar that I couldn't comment on that. As for the size around a bolt head, lots of other threads have done that but the tolerance of my small sample size compared to the size of tolerances being measured just wouldn't be an accurate worry. Heck the tolerances on so many different bolts far outweighs the tolerance on the sockets.

Things like surface contact area.... well actually most sockets are designed to specifications for aerospace use where the design is actually prescribed in details. So in reality, they will all have similar contact area. Just as long as you choose one that doesn't grip on the corner like the old school sockets. Get the new designs that grip on the faces and you won't notice a difference between a Proto and a Snap-On or SK or Armstrong.

I own a lot of armstrong sockets The quality of all is extremely consistent.
Yes and Armstrong was my first choice. So many things I liked about them. But I can't get a single set without rust. And all the CM sockets I currently own have developed rust in them over time.

Another problem here is sample size.
There's a dozen sockets of each brand shown above in the pictures above. Sure it's not a super huge sample size, but it is representative of what you will get if you purchase a set. I've actually purchased 2 other Armstrong sets (full 1/4" metric and 3/8" sae with ratchets) and already returned both of them because they had rust inside of brand new sockets. This type of quality is piss poor and shouldn't be acceptable. I know a lot of people like old rusted tools, but you'll never see rust on any tools used in professional racing.

One other point is, do yo know when the SK set was made?
I really wanted to believe that SK was making top quality stuff. However, you can't continue to use the excuse that every bad socket is instantly old stock. Eventually that excuse becomes mute. The only way to avoid it is to pay full retail and buy direct, I guess. This would also make warranty easier I'm sure.

This is incorrect. German sockets are also painted inside.
Perhaps, but don't get paint confused with satin or rough chrome. Many German tools are not polished chrome, but still chrome. Paint will have a color which is different from the rest of the tool.

Craftsman does offer dual-marked sockets, something you mention they do not.
Yeah, I'm a bit confused here too. Some easy read are dual-marked and some aren't. My older easy read 3/8" deep metric ones aren't dual marked.

but i don't get your correlation between shorter sockets being made shorter to save money.
There is some correlation, but there's many other reasons why companies choose a certain length and each reason has it's own weighting. I surely agree that keeping the length the same over the years is the most important rather than changing them up.

As for conclusions, Proto won this battle. Armstrong has a problem with rust, SK needs better detents and insides. I just wish companies would make the sizes easier to read by not putting the part number and other stuff so close helps. But laser etching is something CM and Armstrong have as a major plus.

Guess the next thing is to buy a single socket of each manufacturer and break them, since that's what most of you want to see.... Maybe I'll quit my day job and do nothing but test tools every day. I would love that! but would anyone step up and pay me a salary to do it?
 
Last edited:

Bullitt427

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
244
The SK set is definately part of the Private Ownership period and not Facom or Ideal.

Another point, it seems rather universal that SK is considered on par with Snap-On. Not below grade even under Mac and Matco

Josh
 

85FourEyedGT

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
91
Location
Oakland/UC San Diego
About the whole chroming thing, i think one of the problems is the huge regulation that the US has with chroming and anodizing, perhaps thats why some of the countries with more lax enviromental laws are making better chromed sockets
 

vintagefan

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
613
About the whole chroming thing, i think one of the problems is the huge regulation that the US has with chroming and anodizing, perhaps thats why some of the countries with more lax enviromental laws are making better chromed sockets

Precisely. It's pretty easy to slap on a thick coating of beautiful hexavalent chrome, and then sell the tool for dirt cheap, when you can just drain your vats into the river.


To the OP, the only US brand I've seen that consistenly excels in finish quality is Snap-on. It is VERY, VERY rare that you find any blemish on their sockets. I mean, not even a freaking tiny nick in the chrome.

When you get Snap-on, they come in packing oil, and have a thin coating of chrome inside the socket, but no paint.



The Armstrong and Proto sockets are marketed to industrial users. Those users care about sockets holding up mechanically, in fact most industrial tools don't even have chrome. I don't really think it's fair to look at a tool marketed for the industrial market, and then critique the chrome. It's not really what they're going for.

As far as the SK go, I've seen them in their heyday, and I know that they're capable of world class quality. I hope that ideal leads them in that direction.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

bcradio

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,017
Location
New Mexico
The SK set is definately part of the Private Ownership period and not Facom or Ideal.

Another point, it seems rather universal that SK is considered on par with Snap-On. Not below grade even under Mac and Matco

Josh

Looks like we got ourselves an SK lover here! With that said, Proto and Wright are just as "on par" with quality as SK is.

All 3 are great
 

Bullitt427

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
244
Looks like we got ourselves an SK lover here! With that said, Proto and Wright are just as "on par" with quality as SK is.

All 3 are great

I'm not ashamed to admit I am a huge SK fan... I would put Williams up there with the best as well.

I have SK from each era... A lot of my collection is Facom, close 2nd is Dresser era and have just started getting Ideal era. The in-House Private ownership is the lowest of the low for quality. You hardly ever see those blemishes and mistakes in Dresser, Facom or now with Ideal.

Josh
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
proto, wright, and snap on are in the elite high end.

Armstrong, SK are in the high end. Not quite there with those guys. They know how to make an industrial grade tool, as they are the top 3 industrial tool makers out there. Proto, wright then snap on. These are the tools that put skyscrapers and bridges together.
 

smothers33

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
355
1 Thing that should be noted is price. While the photos look great and you had no problems they are close to s/o prices from what i saw online.i just bought a set of sk 1/4 sockets off tooltopia. 49 piece set for 130.00. there was 2 different sockets though. 1Was excellent quality. Awesome chrome, great detents, and great stamping. Then a couple sockets were different. Stamping weren't as deep, insides were painted, and chrome was alright. You could tell right away which were new vs old stock. Obviously no way to prove it but you could just tell. I could've warranties them but it doesn't affect the performance so I dont mind too much. for the price they are awesome though.
 
OP
C

cbracer

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
637
Location
Costa Mesa, CA
they are close to s/o prices from what i saw online.i just bought a set of sk 1/4 sockets off tooltopia. 49 piece set for 130.00.

I got the each set, Proto, Armstrong and SK all for $80-$90 each. That's less than Snap-On any day of the week. Of course if you pay full retail price then you're still less but close to Snap-On prices. Your 49 piece set for $130 is a great price.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
Snap on, Matco, Mac, Cornwall all have fixed price control. No competition. So they keep their price allot higher then industrial grade tools, that are carried in industrial supple stores. Or high grade tools carried at auto part stores. No competition, no need to sell for less then msrp.
 

back2class

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
2,723
1 Thing that should be noted is price. While the photos look great and you had no problems they are close to s/o prices from what i saw online.i just bought a set of sk 1/4 sockets off tooltopia. 49 piece set for 130.00. there was 2 different sockets though. 1Was excellent quality. Awesome chrome, great detents, and great stamping. Then a couple sockets were different. Stamping weren't as deep, insides were painted, and chrome was alright. You could tell right away which were new vs old stock. Obviously no way to prove it but you could just tell. I could've warranties them but it doesn't affect the performance so I dont mind too much. for the price they are awesome though.

How come nobody wanted my nice SK 1/4 set I listed here the other day for something like $65?

I have to side with an earlier poster. Have never seen SK sockets that are even close to the same leauge as Snap-On based on looks. Some has nice chrome, but rough broaching, clunky, and just nothing to write home about. For the same price I would take Craftsman over SK on sockets. Now I do run a full set of SK wrenches and they are much better finished and flex less than Craftsman raised panels.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
The problem with the sk socket set you have is that it is not any better then the Craftsman sockets. The are more with not performance improvement over the lower price Craftsman. The Wrenches are very nice, they are stronger then the RP, the same as the Cmas pro's. So their wrenches really have more value then the RP.
 

Davefr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
11,818
Location
OR
Excellent analysis!!

Don't take this the wrong way but I'd like to see more focus on substance vs. style. (strength, reliability, ability to take some abuse).

My bolts don't tend to complain about the asthetics of the inside of the socket. However they do want the socket to fit right and turn the bolt reliably over time.

I'd think a better test would be to rest a socket on a large ball bearing and put it under a hydraulic press and measure the fracture pressure or socket deformation. (yes, easier said then done!!)
 

buening

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
1,338
Location
Decatur, IL
I'm curious to see how your warranty SK replacement sockets compare to the rest of your set. I too agree your set is pre-Ideal. I've had similar issues and the replacements I received were impressive compared to the remainder of the set I had. Pre-Ideal, they had a very outdated factory with old tooling. With the new Ideal factory and state of the art machinery, tolerances are good and does not have the sloppy broaching as seen in your pictures. If I had to choose though, I'd probably lean towards Proto over SK as personal preference.
 

otis66

Well-known member
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
1,875
The problem with the sk socket set you have is that it is not any better then the Craftsman sockets. The are more with not performance improvement over the lower price Craftsman. The Wrenches are very nice, they are stronger then the RP, the same as the Cmas pro's. So their wrenches really have more value then the RP.

If you look inside of a SK socket you will see that it is made like a Snap On socket. A craftsman socket is not made as strong as a SK socket. Craftsman sockets are easy to brake.
 

back2class

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
2,723
If you look inside of a SK socket you will see that it is made like a Snap On socket. A craftsman socket is not made as strong as a SK socket. Craftsman sockets are easy to brake.

Some older SK sockets were cold broached. Not any better than how craftsman sockets are formed...just different and one could be better worse depending on what the mfg specs and produces. The less deep broaching makes them a little stronger I suppose....but how much torque are you putting on small 1/4" drive fasteners?
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
As much as the sk is nice product. It is not better then the armstrong aka craftman. I have used them. And there is really nothing that they offer that are any better then the armstrong or craftman. Strenght wise the craftsman and armstrong do hold up very well.

The extra cost it the precieve quality of the brand name, not the actually quality of the tool. To me pretty chrome does not equate the for extra cost.

To be honest the only set in this group that is worth the extra money really is the proto. I use them at work, and they are better then william, armstrong, and sk sockets we have at work.
 

buening

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
1,338
Location
Decatur, IL
FWIW, I've cracked many Craftsman sockets (at least two of the 1/2" standard depth 3/8" drive sockets). Since I was having issues, I've slowly replaced my Craftsman with S-K over the years and have yet to break any of the S-Ks. I have not measured the wall thickness for comparison. Most of my S-Ks are Dressers and pre-Dressers.
 

wornoutoldman

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
4,263
Location
Conover WI "God's Country"
Also worth noting the SK and the Proto will bottom on the head of a bolt or nut. The Armstorng/Craftsman do not have this feature. Making it extremely difficult to start a bolt or nut from the socket as it will fall into the socket. This is why I have always disliked Craftsman sockets.

Good comparison. Thanks!
 
Last edited:

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
FWIW, I've cracked many Craftsman sockets (at least two of the 1/2" standard depth 3/8" drive sockets). Since I was having issues, I've slowly replaced my Craftsman with S-K over the years and have yet to break any of the S-Ks. I have not measured the wall thickness for comparison. Most of my S-Ks are Dressers and pre-Dressers.

We have crack the newer sk sockets as well, I have seen SO and Matco socket crack. It depends on what you are using. My contractors use 1/2 and 3/4 when assembling our iron work. And the Armstrong work just fine when torquing them down. But when we are having to really secure it with high torque application, the proto are the socket of choice. And the I know the Armstrong and SK will not survive long in those application. The only other sockets I would trust for those application are Snap On and Wright.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
There's no objective information in this post, just you claiming that you think Proto is better than SK and SK is the same quality as Craftsman. There's nothing to back up those claims. Plus you have no objective info to say why the Proto is better.

There's actually no objective information posted by anyone in this thread.

If it were up to me, the only one I wouldn't buy is the Armstrong. They're a poor bargain for what they are, which appears to just be the same sockets you can buy branded Craftsman.

There is not any really data gather, but when you work at major construction sites. You know the tools that the big boys used to put the liberty tower together.

My opinions comes form the availability for company provided tools. They supply the tools, and we try everything. With seeing the abuse that work site tools take. When ask at work, what to get at the major work site, I said order the proto the money is well spent. For none work site tools for the techs. I say get decent. Armstrong work well, and it is easy to warranty.

Hopefully Ideal will right the SK boat and get their tools to a better quality. Because the new stuff is not that nice.

Also spent 10 years in the Army, the armstrong tools we used held up well with the abuse they saw. So while we broke sockets every now and then, it was mostly due to the level of abuse and uses they see.
 
Last edited:

Davefr

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
11,818
Location
OR
As much as the sk is nice product. It is not better then the armstrong aka craftman. I have used them. And there is really nothing that they offer that are any better then the armstrong or craftman. Strenght wise the craftsman and armstrong do hold up very well.

Actually nearly all sockets tend to hold up quite well. (even Harbor Freight)

In order to make judgements as to strength there needs to be some testing to the point of failure backed up with data!! I have yet to see any meaningful comparisons.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
You most likely will not. No tool company will give you a honest test. You can kinda gather if the tools will last if they meet mil spec.

But for industrial tools in the USA, the big boys are proto, wright and snap on. That is the tools that big builders order. Especially with the 3/4 dr stuff and larger.
 

shoturtle

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
4,395
Location
Frankfurt AM
I just saying that sk is not in the same league. Just know proto and armstrong and snap on has mil spec tools. So strength wise it is subjective to say that the craftsman/armstrong is not as strong. All sockets brand break.

Now SK do not compare in the 3/4 and up sizes. They just do not play in that league. When dealing with nuts and bolts that size. Their is way more torque. I remember when breaking track 1" dr with a 3 foot breaker and a 5 foot pipe. Rule of thumb. Crank till the first audio crack and it is tight. Armstrong and Proto took that abuse all the time.

Superstructure construction uses hydraulic 1" drives to bolt 2 inch bolts. Socket brands Proto Wright and Snap On. Super high torque. These company know what they are doing when dealing with large drives.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom