The whole point of a HYBRID PV system is to avoid (as much as possible) buy power from the PoCo.
To my "hybrid" means a system with a battery.
I've got regular old "grid tie" solar, based on what I see, when we are producing PV, we're using almost all of it, I believe it comes in at slightly over grid voltage, so you "should" (in theory) be using the power you produce first with any grid tie system.
To do this, you remove the feed from the meter to the main load center and connect it to the inverter/charger. The output of the inverter/charger now goes to the main load center.
From experience, a hybrid system that is PV solar and grid tie does "switching". PV solar is not really that stable, it just takes a cloud to massively alter your current output. When this happens the hybrid inverter will switch to grid (or to battery).
Regular PV grid tie will work just as well, no switching. Your PV power is just a little "hotter" than grid, so you'll pull that first.
What's cool about true hybrid is that you can store excess (if you have it and if your grid provider pays a crappy rate for any back-fed power). So you can do time of use storage and discharge in many cases.
Batteries are expensive. Expect 100% or more cost.
Doing a "in the middle" switching inverter at household scale of 200A capable inverter - that's really expensive. It's also unnecessary unless you want a backup option with battery.
On paper, this looks simple. In real life it is not ! Lots of heavy gauge wire, conduit, disconnects, etc. $,$$$ !
Yes, to push 13KW from 48V batteries we're using 2/0 gauge copper with two inverters and two battery banks. That's about 25% of your basic residential 200A.
Some PoCos are now charging extra for peak usage times. If you have a big enough battery bank, you can "ride through" those times and even if you don't have sufficient solar power, you can (partially) recharge during "non-peak" hours.
This is where hybrid makes sense. Charge at low costs (solar or grid) and discharge at peak. 100%.