Apologies, I am not in anyway doubting your experience and practicality.
I am speaking about theorizing that the lineman (and code inspectors) really shouldn't be so concerned about back feeding the grid as it is a low risk that they would be injured/killed. Neither of us are lineman or grid engineers, and are not taking the risk of working on these lines or fully understand what those risks may be, so I think it is reasonable to default to the experts with training and experience in the matter, and not what we estimate the risk to be.
No problem. We all have our individual traits and backgrounds. I may be a little non-standard with the trade and physics mix. But my main point is it is best not to extrapolate too much.
One of the things I like about Physics as a field is that people are very much from all over with very diverse backgrounds in all directions. You know this, but if others follow and are curious, we have people of all nationalities, groups, ages, etc. When I was a grad student at MIT years ago (early 90s), I think I was the only native born USA guy working in theoretical physics (that low USA count was probably atypical for that specific year, but people being from all over is certainly typical). The laws of nature are definite, so physicists debate -- but typically do so carefully and listen to others for the most part since they do not want to be tagged with making significant mistakes. I have worked in groups with Orthodox Jewish people and Palestinians working together with proper respect. Lunch convos off technical topics could get interesting (!). It shocked me how smart people would have almost opposite interpretations on the same historical events etc! But, to those individuals credit, they managed to productively work together with proper respect.
The reason I come here is to discuss matters of interest to me with tradesmen etc. Many have good ideas and will explain things. I find Garage Journal much better than reddit boards where 75% reply knowing little or nothing and an alarmingly high % to make everything into a joke or insult. There are a lot of good suggestions on approaches to problems and I have learned a lot from reading threads here. Nothing is perfect, but I do not think most scientists refuse to listen and only lecture. Most scientists will admit when they screwed up since nature is specific. Yes, they may be the types to have strong personalities, dive into things, and try a lot. But is that so bad?
The electrician with linesman friends said that most linesmen doing residential hookups do not work on them live. I think many of those neighborhood systems are 13.8 kV line-to-line, (2 phase, rms) in the primary side. I presume they are locking them down for safety so we are mostly talking about energizing to a circuit break (wire fault etc). High power transmission (think usually more than 70kV) is definately scary. I cannot imagine working on it in outdoor atmosphere with dirt/contaminants, water, etc.
You want fun ... try talking with MDs on how they set medicine doses, know things work, etc. Many in that group get defensive quickly. I suspect this occurs since the medical community is trained to project expert authority and to avoid questions to keep a rapid progression of patients necessary for the high salaries and cost. Sure, most of what they are doing is best known practice and they know more. But many in the medical community appear to have a hard time understanding natural curiosity can drive questions. Some want to understand the basis of the approach and want to understand by discussion/questions and are not questioning as a slight of credentials.