Or sold I sale this make a 2x4 frame use a vspour plastic on the back of the 2x4 against wall an use r13 in the frame then cover front. Or use this eps 1/2 on the back of frame against wall r13 the frame an cover front that be over kill pretty much but keep heat in an also a lot more money but I'm thinking of selling the eps sheets an getting the iso foam board 1/2 or 1" an gluing to wall an call it a day
XPS vs EPS is more complicated than first glance as XPS R value degrades to R 4 per 1" over time and then stabilizes,EPS is fairly stable from the start.
I would look some where other than marketing claims to get real world long term performance. 20 years ago when I started installing radiant heat as a contractor I believed that XPS was the only product that worked for slab insulation and below grade applications. Not so, EPS and XPS both have their place and EPS is undersold.This is the XPS that I'm using... Seems like they are pretty confidant that it will hold its R5 value.
From the Dow site: Most STYROFOAM™ Brand Extruded Polystyrene Foam Insulation products have a stabilized R-value of 5.0 per inch. Unlike other insulation materials, the R-value for STYROFOAM™ Brand Extruded Polystyrene Foam Insulation does not appreciably decrease over time.
http://dow-styrofoam.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/721/related/1/session/L2F2LzEvdGltZS8xMzU3ODcyNjk1L3NpZC9UWk5lXy1mbA%3D%3D
I would look some where other than marketing claims to get real world long term performance. 20 years ago when I started installing radiant heat as a contractor I believed that XPS was the only product that worked for slab insulation and below grade applications. Not so, EPS and XPS both have their place and EPS is undersold.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-value_(insulation)
http://www.foam-control.com/downloads/brochure/foam-face-off-xps-architect.pdf
and there is this concerning water absorption http://www.foam-control.com/downloads/brochure/foam-face-off-xps-architect.pdf
They both are available in different densities.. http://www.buildings.com/Portals/1/images/Magazines/0609/B_0609_SB_ENVELOPE_lg.jpg
Most commercial projects that involve architects and engineers spec EPS as it is generally the most cost effective product.

Here the cost difference is at least 80% per inch and about 40% on actual r value. Last job had 1.5" eps $12 and xps at $20 per sheet, and 2" eps at $13. I've got 3 quotes for xps on 85 sheets and they range from 20 to 22. There are a lot of local producers of eps scattered through out the country. I do though use both depending on the availability of higher density eps at the time.So your telling me not to look at marketing claims for XPS and then provide a link to a marketing brochure for EPS?
According to the tests I saw, based on ASTM C518, the R value of XPS was at least 5.5 per inch after four years of aging.
Seems like there is a bit of headroom.
I do understand that one reason that XPS performs better is because the blowing agent has a higher molecular weight and that the blowing agent will diffuse out over time.
I also know DOW tested its new CO2 blowing agent and then increased its warranty for R value from 25 to 50 years for 1.5" and thicker foam.
They increased the warranty of the 1 to 1.5" material to 30 years. My take is that the thicker material is more resistant to diffusion (seems reasonable) and DOW factored that into their warranty.
Based on the LTTR test report that I saw as well as a bunch of other info, I think that DOW's claims are believable (no more than a 10% loss below the rated value in 50 years). It also seems like they pad the rated value by 20%. For the first 20 or so years the insulation should perform above spec, at 50 years it's within 10%.
Based on Home Depot's prices, the XPS's dollar to R value is low until you get to the 2" material. Below that the EPS is a much better value. Basicly 1" XPS does not seem like a good deal, better to get a bit thicker EPS to get to a certain R value.
At 2" the Dow XPS is about 10% more expensive ( based on R value, not total price) than EPS, but it offers about 20% better performance.
I agree that both have their place (I have been using both for my projects).
Based on a lot of reading, I still feel that R5 per inch of XPS is a valid number.
Looks good Blkctsv05 A little insulation malkes a huge difference when compared to none. The foil and the radiant go hand in hand.Also hung the first layer an I started to feel the radiant heat off the boards so that's a plus vs the blocks cold an slight breeze