Viper98912
Well-known member
Hello GJ friends,
It's time to re-treat the house surroundings with termite chemicals. I live in GA, my home is ~10 years old, and we currently have zero termite issues.
In looking at the quotes, it's:
~$1,000 to treat (and the treatment lasts 10 years)
and
+ another ~$150 per year for inspections (and free re-treat if issues found), but damage/repair costs are not covered
or + another $250 per year for inspections, and damage/repair costs are covered
So basically, the extra $100/year is an insurance policy for damage/repair, because standard homeowners policies do not cover termites.
What I'm honestly not understanding though is the additional ~$150/year for the inspections and free re-treat. We didn't have any issues the first 10 years they came around, and I'm pretty sure I can walk through my house and look at the baseboards with a flashlight to see if we have any issues.
Am I missing something here? Should I just pay the ~$1,000 for the treatment, but forego the yearly inspection cost? If the treatment fails, I'd probably be SOL more than $1,000 to fix the house; getting a freebie "we'll treat again" doesn't really appear to be sound judgement on my part.
Thoughts?
It's time to re-treat the house surroundings with termite chemicals. I live in GA, my home is ~10 years old, and we currently have zero termite issues.
In looking at the quotes, it's:
~$1,000 to treat (and the treatment lasts 10 years)
and
+ another ~$150 per year for inspections (and free re-treat if issues found), but damage/repair costs are not covered
or + another $250 per year for inspections, and damage/repair costs are covered
So basically, the extra $100/year is an insurance policy for damage/repair, because standard homeowners policies do not cover termites.
What I'm honestly not understanding though is the additional ~$150/year for the inspections and free re-treat. We didn't have any issues the first 10 years they came around, and I'm pretty sure I can walk through my house and look at the baseboards with a flashlight to see if we have any issues.
Am I missing something here? Should I just pay the ~$1,000 for the treatment, but forego the yearly inspection cost? If the treatment fails, I'd probably be SOL more than $1,000 to fix the house; getting a freebie "we'll treat again" doesn't really appear to be sound judgement on my part.
Thoughts?
