jmh21586
Well-known member
I think some just don't like change...
And some people do not like freedom.... and choices.
I think some just don't like change...
So do my incandescents.My cfl's come on right away.
So you can have yours but I can't have mine is that what you're saying?
I also have another question. When CFL's are the only bulbs, and we're saving all this energy, do you think your rate per KWH is going to go down?
""So you can have yours but I can't have mine is that what you're saying? So you can have a dragster, running on alcohol or something, burning how many gallons in a quarter mile, presumably have a workshop for said dragster, and presumable using all types of powertools to make and maintain it, yet you want incandescent lights banned. Is that pretty much the jist of it??""
You are making assumptions about my actions. My race car goes through less fuel in a race day than it takes for me drive to work and back. But I digress. I'm not defending my hobby, nor will I. I gave up incondescents, and realized just how small the impact on life that was. So I am in favor of others doing the same. I respect your affection with your lightbulbs, but I also understand that everyone giving up this one thing could make a measurable difference in energy consumption. It isn't just about being able to pay for it.
"" Do you know how ignorantly stupid that sounds?
Since I have no hotrods, I think they should be banned, so we can save whatever the hell you think we're saving. How about that? Surely you don't mind the sacrifice.""
I reapect your thoughts. Fortunately for me, race cars have not been legislated out of the picture. So I don't have to cross that bridge right now. There may be a day, and I won't cry sour grapes. i will change how I race to accomidate the new rules. Others will be doing the same, so the equipment will be availible.
""I can't believe the gall of some people.""
I can't believe you got so worked up about someone else having an opinion that differs from yours.
""I also have another question. When CFL's are the only bulbs, and we're saving all this energy, do you think your rate per KWH is going to go down?""
The big picture with cfl's has nothng to do with saving money. it has to do with using less energy.
Most CFLs will not dim. Even if they say they dim, they do not. Then the can't get past the lightup spike, and make noise when dimmed. Also the "dimmable CFLs" cost double to tripple of the regular CFLs. You know what, I can it just doesn't cost when you have dimmers in the house.
The big picture with cfl's has nothng to do with saving money. it has to do with using less energy.
So get rid of your dragster to save energy.
I can attest to the "dimmable CFL bulbs" not dimming. I paid $10+ a pice for a couple to try out in my kitchen can lights. They just don't dim.
My regular bulbs go from full brightness down to the equivalent of a lit match.
You can NOT use a normal CFL with your standard dimmer.....it takes a special CFL and the dimmer control has to be of the type to match the bulb.....so, if your trying to dim CFL's with the wrong dimmer....no wonder your bulbs are going out...

I personally don't use dimmers in the house....If I want more light....I turn on more lights....if I want less....I turn off...

I don't care about efficiency. I care about light quality and light control.Analog use a variable resistor to reduce the voltage....the problem with useing this type is that it produces heat....as you dim the lights down, more power is being droped across the dimmer...not real effecient.
Or I can have regular bulbs and dim them the way I like.So.....if you want to control how much light you have....have several smaller ones....and turn on the ones you need.....


Oh yeah..here's another thought....GE...one of the major players in the CFL technology has received BILLIONS in bailout money. I suppose there's no connection though.
I still don't see the big deal about the mandate. We are stuck with all sorts of rules anyhow. Gotta wear a helmet on motorcycles. Need to have auto insurance. Have to wear seat belts. Need to immunize your children against major communicable deseases. Can't shoot up with illegal drugs. Can't use old style light bulbs. We can stomp our feet and whine about another rule, or we can pick our battles. If we were talking about outlawing guns....I could see the uproar. But over lightbulbs? Really? To save some electricity? It isn't worth getting your ******* in a bunch over. At least not my *******...errr...briefs.
It's called a 'nanny state'. Big government tells you what is good for you and passes laws to protect you from yourself. Problem with most Americans is that it has happened so slowly they don't even realize how many freedoms and liberties they don't have. At it's present rate if Americans don't wake up from denial and apathy we are going to be told what to eat, what to drive, how warm you can keep your house, and yes..even what kind of light bulb you can use. We are light years away from the intent of our original founding fathers.
I didn't read the whole topic, but there is one thing I wanted to add, in the defense of incandescent bulbs.
They put out heat.
Now, in the summer that isn't a good thing, however lights are on a lot more in the winter anyway.
Any heat they put out is that much less the main heater has to produce.
So basically, If you heat with electricity, incandescent bulbs in the winter are free light.
Even if you heat with oil, it's still that much less oil you will burn, the cost saving just won't be quite as big.
Give up your dragster yet?? For the good of the country and future generations? Please don't be selfish.I don't think our forefathers had any idea the citizens of this country could be so selfish and wasteful, and in many cases, ignorant.
With regards to cfl's: What if the quantities were changed? What if these things were garenteed to save half of your electric bill? You consume half the energy you used to. But they were very expensive...with maybe a 3 year payback.
Still got that dragster? i don't have one. Maybe if you didn't have a dragster, there would be more fuel and energy supplies for future generations.But if the nation used them as a whole, we would have enough coal for our great grandkids generation and beyond. Should it be required that we use them? If only 10% of our nation uses them, we don't get any real benefit. Should the common good and futures of our future generations perhaps trump slightly some of our individual freedoms?
What if cars that had technology to completely eliminate our dependance on cameljammers with guns? In the interest of national security long term, would it be worth mandating their use?
Is there nothing of common interest to our nation that is worth making small, mandated sacrifices to achieve?

Arrogantly and wastefully walking through our lives at the expense of others and future generations wilst waving the trump card of "my freedom to do whatever I can afford to do" is quite another.
I don't think our forefathers had any idea the citizens of this country could be so selfish and wasteful, and in many cases, ignorant. Let's take child car seats for instance. Now that child doesn't understand the forces involved in a crash, nor the concequences resulting. But parents SHOULD. The seats are inexpensive and availible. And yet some never use them. Even though it IS a law. Same ones that smoke in the car with their kids, even though the problems with second hand smoke are proven. Are they harming others? It's possible. Should child seat laws exist? Who else is going to protect the kids from their parents' ignorance?
Helmet laws? Who else would be harmed really? Well, when the rider comes to the hospital with half his brains in a bag, and no insurance..who pays the bill? You and I do. When he needs round the clock care for the rest of his lousy existance, who pays for that? You and I do. I don't want to pay for his risk taking. And shouldn't have to.
With regards to cfl's: What if the quantities were changed? What if these things were garenteed to save half of your electric bill? You consume half the energy you used to. But they were very expensive...with maybe a 3 year payback. But if the nation used them as a whole, we would have enough coal for our great grandkids generation and beyond. Should it be required that we use them? If only 10% of our nation uses them, we don't get any real benefit. Should the common good and futures of our future generations perhaps trump slightly some of our individual freedoms? What if cars that had technology to completely eliminate our dependance on cameljammers with guns? In the interest of national security long term, would it be worth mandating their use? Is there nothing of common interest to our nation that is worth making small, mandated sacrifices to achieve? Enjoying our freedoms is one thing. Arrogantly and wastefully walking through our lives at the expense of others and future generations wilst waving the trump card of "my freedom to do whatever I can afford to do" is quite another.
I'm going to ignore jmh because he is just trolling.....trying to cause problems....

How do you get it to the races? How did you build it? Any power tools involved?Still have the dragster, which burns about 15 gallons at a full race total, if I go deep in rounds.
Still drive fuel efficient vechicles.
I grow my own veggies, raise my own meat, recycle......Still planted about 1500 trees on my own property in the past 3 years. And 3 acres of prairie grasses that I maintain also on my property, which I have dedicated almost entirely to nature. I'm doing my part.
My part? Do you know me or something?I'm doing your part.

I think we should ban needless drag racing. It's 100% wasteful.But you are the one personalizing it to individuals. The issue of cfl's is the combined efforts of a nation making a marked difference on our country's consumption of energy.
In the big picture, giving up drag racing wouldn't be too much to ask would it?? For the good of the country. FOR THE CHILDREN!??!I don't expect everyone to want to or be able to plant on average 500 trees a year, which I plan on doing for many years to come. But putting up with a handful of cfl's probably isn't too much to ask. I didn't think..
I am sure I will have to make some other changes in my life and hobbies due to legislation.
CFLs Do Not Save On Energy Consumption
Power Factor
An incandescent bulb has a power factor of 1. Most CFLs sold in Canada have a power factor of about 0.55. That means there are more energy losses in operating the CFL compared to an incandescent bulb. This does not show up on a power bill but the power company has to supply more power than what the bulb is rated for. Astonishingly, CFLs can take much more energy to operate than what is on the label and still be listed as an energy star product, something few consumers know. CFL cheerleaders seldom tell consumers that the power factor is not included in their energy consumption calculations.