At that point, I would think a used injection molding machine would start to become more economical!
The machine after refurbishment, would probably cost more than his current physical plant, and each mold, which he would need several of, would cost what one rack of printers does. And if he desired to make changes or add new products, after a 30 day turnaround time, if he's lucky, he'd be ready to test his first batch.At that point, I would think a used injection molding machine would start to become more economical!
So you are saying he also needs a 5 axis cnc, right?The machine after refurbishment, would probably cost more than his current physical plant, and each mold, which he would need several of, would cost what one rack of printers does. And if he desired to make changes or add new products, after a 30 day turnaround time, if he's lucky, he'd be ready to test his first batch.
350 Parts to mold.At that point, I would think a used injection molding machine would start to become more economical!
It's mind blowing how Prusa sells anything these days. Their bed slinger is $709 for a kit and $1,000 assembled.
They've got a pretty rabid fanbase.It's mind blowing how Prusa sells anything these days. Their bed slinger is $709 for a kit and $1,000 assembled.
I remember asking you about Injection molding a year or two ago, I think when you were starting to make large filament orders.350 Parts to mold.
china molds run 4k a pop.
the math doesnt math.
I remember asking you about Injection molding a year or two ago, I think when you were starting to make large filament orders.
It seems like you have a high-mix/low-ish volume business which makes a print farm a really good fit. Glad to see it taking off like it is
why not a triangle top so the contact area is much smaller?
My thoughts exactlywhy not a triangle top so the contact area is much smaller?
I have a nice stack of these...they're dirt cheap and awesome
Is that a part which is a reused component across a number of assemblies?
Is that a part which is a reused component across a number of assemblies?
Well, TBH I thought of that about halfway through the printing... and the pyramids likely would have printed faster, too. Perhaps time for me to break out of my simple shapes designing and experiment a bit more!
Can you please explain what that does. I recognize a lathe-type chuck and an electric drill, but can’t make the connection.
I didn't reinvent the wheel, I reinvented the cube!
Quick search showed these, look quick and simple, no need to reinvent the wheel



several years ago, I talked to a guy who ran a shop in a university art school. They'd gotten a 3d printer, and was surprised that the thing he'd helped the most people with printing were funnels, most with threads on the end. So much so, his staff had written a tutorial "so, you want to print a funnel?", that included a parametric model so the user could specify their dimensions, and get a workable design.I've got a coolant funnel for bleeding coolant systems and the adapter I use the most broke. When it happened I was legit bummed for about 15 minutes because I forgot I could DIY a replacement. They aren't expensive but I need the funnel asap for a project.
It's printed out of ASA and I made the walls a little thicker than the original so it should hold up fine.
I forget where I found these settings but they've been an improvement over the defaults for me with PETG.Anyone had luck with other settings to improve?
What nozzle and layer height are you running with those dimensions? Should they be a certain ratio to layer height?I forget where I found these settings but they've been an improvement over the defaults for me with PETG.
Sometimes using normal supports (rather than tree) with concentric interface pattern helps too.
- Top and bottom Z distance 0.28
- Top interface spacing 0.0
- Support/object xy distance 0.45
0.4 nozzle and usually 0.2 layer height. I don't know if ratio vs absolute matters. The extent of my testing was "oh that's an improvement, I'll use that" and never dug further.What nozzle and layer height are you running with those dimensions? Should they be a certain ratio to layer height?
That's with a 0.8 nozzle, right? I'm still slimming it with 0.6's.32 layer height -> .34 z offset
That's with a 0.8 nozzle, right? I'm still slimming it with 0.6's
Is the +0.02mm delta consistent with other layer heights?
My 0.6 profiles all do a 0.30 layer height.no thats .6 standard.
.4 -> .42
seems very similar to what bambu lab uses on the H2CI'm really looking forward to seeing more about this
![]()
INDX By Bondtech - tool-changer solution for multimaterial 3D printing
The INDX By Bondtech is the technology that changes everything. The leading solution for tool changers that supports multi material color and nozzle.www.bondtech.se
I think the sunlu is the way to go.
It is, but it'll work with klipper, which means I could figure out how to get it working on my current printer.seems very similar to what bambu lab uses on the H2C