i want a new milwaukee chainsaw.. its way overdue..
That's such a fine line to walk.
They sell themselves as a "professional" tool company, but no one in their right mind would use an electric chainsaw professionally. Who knows why they came out with one in the 80s/90s in the first place, it was bound to fail. Even if they make the baddest electric chainsaw on the market, they'd still only be able to get a laughable amount of power out of it.
That's such a fine line to walk.
They sell themselves as a "professional" tool company, but no one in their right mind would use an electric chainsaw professionally. Who knows why they came out with one in the 80s/90s in the first place, it was bound to fail. Even if they make the baddest electric chainsaw on the market, they'd still only be able to get a laughable amount of power out of it.
That's such a fine line to walk.
They sell themselves as a "professional" tool company, but no one in their right mind would use an electric chainsaw professionally. Who knows why they came out with one in the 80s/90s in the first place, it was bound to fail. Even if they make the baddest electric chainsaw on the market, they'd still only be able to get a laughable amount of power out of it.
That's such a fine line to walk.
They sell themselves as a "professional" tool company, but no one in their right mind would use an electric chainsaw professionally. Who knows why they came out with one in the 80s/90s in the first place, it was bound to fail. Even if they make the baddest electric chainsaw on the market, they'd still only be able to get a laughable amount of power out of it.
Finally got around to a picture. This is most of my stuff. The batteries and chargers are still hooked up in the Vidmar drawer.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, but from what I can tell from the ****** Twidiot pics, it's quite a bit taller.....which leads me back to let's revive M28 if the whole idea of M18 was to get away from monstrous battery packs, but you're right back there IF you want to run the 9.0 which they call "high demand."
The did re-work the womens' heated jacket so that WILL please the wife.
Lots of new stuff coming out, and while "how many iterations of Fuel drills and drivers do you need?" is one take on it, I would go so far to say the new models are substantial upgrades, and they'll be comparable priced. I don't think they're quite as "completely redesigned" as I was told, but there are big differences between Gen1 and Gen2 models.
Lots of new stuff coming out, and while "how many iterations of Fuel drills and drivers do you need?" is one take on it, I would go so far to say the new models are substantial upgrades, and they'll be comparable priced. I don't think they're quite as "completely redesigned" as I was told, but there are big differences between Gen1 and Gen2 models.
which is why im waiting for the gen2 fuel grinder and compact 1/2 impact
Can you speak to those changes? Aside from size-wise.
Or did they not give out specs yet?
Wow.
It's a pain in the *** to send out images via Twitter, but I did it b/c I thought readers would appreciate seeing some stuff as soon as they were revealed.
Take pic, add description, paste in the tag Milwaukee requested, which also makes it easier for non-Twitter users to find everything via links I posted on ToolGuyd, and then wait while my phone heats up my pocket due to crappy WiFi and cellular signals.
What kind of quality are you expected to see on Twitter?
http://www.milwaukeetool.com/power-tools/cordless/2704-20
1200 in-lbs, this is getting ridiculous! It's listed as peak and not constant though, so maybe only achievable when the moons align?
Too bad we have no testing standards like the EU. Though I guess we can go to milwaukeetool.eu if we want the real specs.
Ah, so it's about a ******* match with the big-boy Makita. Ok, can't blame Milwaukee I guess, if nothing else they want to be perceived as having the most powerful offering, just like modern diesel horsepower wars.
Yeah, I question the claim because Makita provides an abnormally long secondary grip handle to make the drill usable. The one Milwaukee is including is the same as it's ever been, which leads me to believe there's more number fudging than motor upgrades here.

WHAT JUST HAPPENED?
Who says that was aimed at you? Others posted pics of it at #NPS515
It is true I don't like Twitter. Why do you think that in any way correlates to Toolguyd????
I also don't like onions. Does that mean I think Toolguyd *****? Stu, maybe they wouldn't let you bring your meds on the plane but pop 'em now and relax!

Is the paddle switch on the grinder the same as the other Fuels, ie hinged at the rear, collapses at the front and you flip the safety forward?
If so, put in some significant time behind it in a metalworking environment before you decide it's better than the slide switch. I don't like the new paddles, but loved the old. And remember, just 'cause I don't like the new paddle switches does not mean I'm personally attacking Toolguyd!
"Iterations of a drill" was also prompted by my confusion of Milwaukee (seemingly) obsessively re-designing some products like drills and Sawzalls when others are neglected or new products never come to fruition. Yes, I realize these 2 items are their biggest sellers but most consumers couldn't tell you a 2601 from a 2606 to 2603 to a 2604 to a 2704, etc. and now the compact "non-Fuel" brushless is 2701.
Yeah, I question the claim because Makita provides an abnormally long secondary grip handle to make the drill usable. The one Milwaukee is including is the same as it's ever been, which leads me to believe there's more number fudging than motor upgrades here.
Echo's considered professional and their 16" 58V is as powerful as any gas, IF you believe the reviews online. Yes, 16" is small by pro standards but honestly my 18" Stihl has done everything I've ever needed on my property cutting ~5 cords every year for 10 years.
Milwaukee's professional moniker is not THAT literal, it just means they're a bit above homeowner grade, like a GMC 2500HD is not really "heavy duty" in the truck world. It's still a LIGHT DUTY truck in the overall truck market relative to MDT's, semi's/OTR, etc
Likewise TRUE professional tools (which we might call industrial instead) are rarely discussed on the board, ie Dynabrade, TC Service, Dotco. All air tools I realize and not a great example relative to chain saws![]()
Nope, it's not just re-tuning. Beefier gear shaft, heatsink on the electronics (drill), more powerful motor, rejiggered ergonomics, shorter overall length.i am so not buying any more power tools, UNLESS they come out with something usefull that they dont already have.. as far as the impacts and drill specs go - its basically a given they were gonna be handing out the biggest specs with their cordless stuff.. the newest kid on the block was the Makita who was competeing against the oldest - the Milwaukee.. so you know they had no choice in the matter.. besides, im sure most of it is just re-tuning the programming in existing electronics.
Nope, it's not just re-tuning. Beefier gear shaft, heatsink on the electronics (drill), more powerful motor, rejiggered ergonomics, shorter overall length.
Impacts have similar enhancements.
No, not evolutionary differences, but definitely revolutionary.
It'll require some independent testing once the tools are available, as I can't base conclusions on a couple of drilled holes and a couple of driven fasteners, but I liked what I saw thus far.
They wouldn't bump up the specs mid-product cycle, even if it were a matter of tweaking the programming. In reality, bumping up max specs is not such a simple matter.yea i kinda gathered them being a bit beefier, but with everything being the way it is today - what i meant was i dont think it would be much of an effort for Milwaukee to bump up torque specs 10-20% where needed on new stuff AFTER Makita announced its new hammer drill and driver.. actually i think its Ridgid whos winning the torque war on impact drivers now.
i have the high torque model fuel 7/16 drive impact driver, which is "only" rated at like 500 ftlbs (give or take), meanwhile the 1/2" square drive is rated like 250 ftlbs more.. im betting its mostly just programming since the tools themselves are basically identical.. that being said, if i newer model WAS being designed to spec out at 700ftlbs, im betting getting it to hit at 800 instead is just a matter of tuning.. mind you, im just thowing numbers out for an example.. i have no info on anything new.
Here's the new impacts.
http://www.milwaukeetool.com/power-tools/cordless/2754-22
http://www.milwaukeetool.com/power-tools/cordless/2755-20
Maybe a tiny bit slimmer head?
Rated torque is up 10 ft-lbs.
August.Any idea when they will be available at big box store?
Yup!So the 2655B was actually a ball detent, right? Thus the B I figured.
The new 2755B is a friction ring, which I'd prefer anyway
http://www.milwaukeetool.com/power-tools/cordless/2755b-20
The "old" 2655B:
http://www.milwaukeetool.com/power-tools/cordless/2655b-20
Finally got around to a picture. This is most of my stuff. The batteries and chargers are still hooked up in the Vidmar drawer.
So I just ordered the 2712-20 SDS drill, along with the shop vac to add to my collection. Don't think I need the 1 1/8 sds. Already have the Fuel 7 1/4 circular saw, grinder and 1/4 impact driver. Several other non fuel as well.
So whats everyone's thoughts in the 2712?
Thanks,
Tim