The Milwaukee addiction thread! :)

[manwithtools]

M18 miter saw owners, what do you think of your purchase? I see that they are now available with two 9.0 batteries for $599 which is not unreasonable given the cost of 9.0 batteries.

What stand are you using if any?

I really like my 12" DeWalt compound slider, but it's a heavy beast and is showing it's age. It would be handy to have the cordless for a couple of decks I need to rebuild this spring.

 

[rmsg0040]

Okay

A 3/8 drive a 450/600lb rating?

350 ft lb or more on 3/8 would be nice

 

[enyce9]

I'd be interested to see how long this lasts on an impact. Not really designed for that, but who knows....

I used it on an impact a few times while renovating my house, Had no issue with it. I believe it says it can be used in an impact.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[DFB]

350 ft lb or more on 3/8 would be nice

Guess it would very competitive as the new IR has specs like that.

 

[fordgasm]

Just arrived 5 minutes ago. Debating if I'm gonna keep the 9Ah & rapid charger or just sell it.

 

[manwithtools]

I used it on an impact a few times while renovating my house, Had no issue with it. I believe it says it can be used in an impact.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Interesting, the detail specs do say "The attachment functions well with both traditional drills and impact drivers for maximum versatility."

They don't explicitly say "impact rated", but they certainly imply it. Good to know.

 

[whitetailhntr]

Just arrived 5 minutes ago. Debating if I'm gonna keep the 9Ah & rapid charger or just sell it.

You just wanted a sawzall? Wouldnt it of been easier to find a good deal off eBay for a bare tool?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[fordgasm]

You just wanted a sawzall? Wouldnt it of been easier to find a good deal off eBay for a bare tool?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I got it from acme tools. They had a 17% off promo for New Years. So $249 became 206 to my door with no tax and free shipping. I can easily flip the battery and charger for $140+. Makes the saw a deal.

 

[2002maniac]

I just bought the last 9.0 sawzall kit in my local store. I got it home and it was a return that was thrashed! It seriously looks like it's been on a job site for a year!

Do you think I'll have any luck getting HD to exchange the tool only and let me keep the battery and charger?

 

[icu2tsx]

I got it from acme tools. They had a 17% off promo for New Years. So $249 became 206 to my door with no tax and free shipping. I can easily flip the battery and charger for $140+. Makes the saw a deal.

That's the way to do it. I kept my fuel sawzall and fuel m18 circular saw for $52 each. Sold batteries and chargers. eBay can't match this deal lol

 

[Fix Until Broke]

Okay

A 3/8 drive a 450/600lb rating?

Yes - to match up with their pneumatic counterparts. That's why I have not bought a cordless 3/8" impact yet, can't find one anywhere near as good as my pneumatic one. The current ~200 ft-lbf offerings are just not worth it in my opinion.

 

[cajunfirehawk]

I got it from acme tools. They had a 17% off promo for New Years. So $249 became 206 to my door with no tax and free shipping. I

I got the same deal except: when my sawzall arrived it was the 7 1/4 circular saw, the p/n's are very close except the last letter being an "S" or a "C", I ordered an"S" and was sent the $50 more expensive "C" but since I already have the circular saw and didn't want to rip them off, I contacted them and sent pics of their screw up, so sawzall number 2 is suppose to ship next week I assume so we can swap these out.

 

[DFB]

I find these posts about a 3/8 drive mid torque powered impact wrench interesting.

And Milwaukee often steps up given enough demand for a tool.


So for some continued discussion (and for those just viewing) what would be the main advantages of the smaller anvil over using a standard 1/2". Socket size? My I/2" impacts do go down to 3/8 or 10mm but overall are larger in diameter than their 3/8 counterparts.

Or is the concept of increased power in 3/8 drive for a tool smaller than the new 2861. Like maybe an improved compact model?


I also tend to agree about the nominal power rating of the compact impacts especially of the current 1/2 compact 2755B. That is probably the main reason I wouldn't invest in one, But the new MTIW does look promising

Obviously using a 3/8 reducer is a weak point with 1/2 especially if there some power behind it. But adapting up outside of maybe some small torque loss coupling those dual pieces should not really be a problem.

 

[kctyphoon]

Just arrived 5 minutes ago. Debating if I'm gonna keep the 9Ah & rapid charger or just sell it.

I'd keep it unless u have another.. the charger is only going for about $35 on ebay, battery like $120 I think.. if you don't have another, or other 9.0 batteries, this will be the cheapest you will ever get one. And then Down the road if you get something like a string trimmer or the miter saw - or something else Milwaukee releases - then you already have the battery and charger..

At least that's what I told myself since I really have no need for the 9.0, but it's the best opportunity to have gotten one..

 

[Fix Until Broke]

I find these posts about a 3/8 drive mid torque powered impact wrench interesting.

And Milwaukee often steps up given enough demand for a tool.


So for some continued discussion (and for those just viewing) what would be the main advantages of the smaller anvil over using a standard 1/2". Socket size? My I/2" impacts do go down to 3/8 or 10mm but overall are larger in diameter than their 3/8 counterparts.

Or is the concept of increased power in 3/8 drive for a tool smaller than the new 2861. Like maybe an improved compact model?


I also tend to agree about the nominal power rating of the compact impacts especially of the current 1/2 compact 2755B. That is probably the main reason I wouldn't invest in one, But the new MTIW does look promising

Obviously using a 3/8 reducer is a weak point with 1/2 especially if there some power behind it. But adapting up outside of maybe some small torque loss coupling those dual pieces should not really be a problem.

For me it's size and simplicity. 99% of anything on a car that you work on uses a 3/8" drive socket. Unless I'm torquing a FWD axle nut (36mm), Crankshaft pulley, pinion nut, etc, I'm using a 3/8" socket. Even when I change wheels, I most commonly use my 3/8" pneumatic impact and sockets because it's lighter/smaller/etc.

If I have to always have a 1/2-3/8 reducer on the tool or use 1/2" drive sockets, everything is longer or bigger/heavier than it needs to be.

The other part is principle - it's frustrating when I have to get my 3/8 ratchet out and break a fastener loose that my impact won't take off and I don't have to push all that hard to do it. The only time I should have to use my ratchet is when the impact won't fit or I need the control of manual operation.

 

[chrisnazzy]

Wide wheels, low profile tires... I use to have big wheels (for the time) on a couple cars when I was younger.. it gets old quick when you start bending rims from all the potholes around here.. I must have ran over a bolt on the NJ Turnpike years ago.. giant hole in the tire, giant hole in the chrome lip of the wheel too.. cost me a little over $800 to commute to work that day....

Had $4000 in rims and tires on the 93 Typhoon I had when I was younger. I'd be lucky if Id make it 2 months before I'd have to get them balanced again.. ah, the good ol' days. Was on The verge of lowering my crosstour and swapping out wheels again.. still have the rims I picked out bookmarked just in case I change my mind.. lol

This is so true and definitely struck a cord with me as well. I've had 5 big lifted Chevy's over the years, always with the best lifts, tires, wheels, exhaust and other goodies. Now every morning I get in my Honda Pilot and think, "man I love this truck." I have done a 2" lift, XD wheels and bigger A/T tires but we take it offroad more than I ever did with my big trucks. Does make me feel kinda old, well that and having my 2 oldest daughters attending high school at my high school.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

 

[Distrophe]

my 2 oldest daughters attending high school at my high school.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

Thats pretty cool.

I'd keep it unless u have another.. the charger is only going for about $35 on ebay, battery like $120 I think.. if you don't have another, or other 9.0 batteries, this will be the cheapest you will ever get one. And then Down the road if you get something like a string trimmer or the miter saw - or something else Milwaukee releases - then you already have the battery and charger..

At least that's what I told myself since I really have no need for the 9.0, but it's the best opportunity to have gotten one..

I also just received this kit. $206 - charger & battery = $45 or so for sawzall. I am keeping them.
My other batteries are only 4ah and 2ah so the 9.0 is welcome.
Hopping for another coupon to get the Fuel cordless circular saw.

 

[JimDon]

Don't be too hasty about those 9.0 batteries (what am I going to use THAT for).
If you've got the wet/dry vac, stick a 9.0 in it and you've got oodles of run time. Got a cordless Mil. grinder? A 5.0 is OK in it, but a 9 is going to be dynamite. Chew thru some wood studded with nails or screws and that sawzall will look like a champ with the 9. Cordless lights during a power outage? Run one on low and you can probably make a couple of nights before a recharge. And then there is the lawn equipment -- cordless string trimmer? A 9.0 is going to be just what you want with that.
Cheers,
Jim Don

 

[DFB]

For me it's size and simplicity. 99% of anything on a car that you work on uses a 3/8" drive socket. Unless I'm torquing a FWD axle nut (36mm), Crankshaft pulley, pinion nut, etc, I'm using a 3/8" socket. Even when I change wheels, I most commonly use my 3/8" pneumatic impact and sockets because it's lighter/smaller/etc.

If I have to always have a 1/2-3/8 reducer on the tool or use 1/2" drive sockets, everything is longer or bigger/heavier than it needs to be.

The other part is principle - it's frustrating when I have to get my 3/8 ratchet out and break a fastener loose that my impact won't take off and I don't have to push all that hard to do it. The only time I should have to use my ratchet is when the impact won't fit or I need the control of manual operation.

Thanks for responding with that I see what your saying.




I also would like to see the most power in a compact form but alas we're getting what we're getting here...

Now the new Mid Torque Impact wrench certainly wont make anything smaller even if there was 3/8 anvil offering it will be exactly all that much bigger 3/4" in length and heavier about 1lb more than the current compact wrenches. Up at farm most of this wont make much difference, but if I can substitute the new 2861 for the HTIW that'll be good, 2 lbs difference is a lot.

According to the COP Tool linkup the new Milwaukee 2861 and the IR 1/2 or 3/8 are comparatively the same size and weight. There is also a chart there outlining specs between the High Torque, the Mid and the compact wrenches from Milwaukee including recommended bolt sizes. The current compact wrenches can sometimes struggle with certain wheel nuts or work a lot harder than they have to. So looking at the charting recommendations the new mid is now the tool specified for lugnuts and fasteners up to 1 3/8 and though the compacts are charted for 7/8 and below it doesn't actually specify lugnuts go figure.

Just for kicks I measured a couple of setups in the garage right now on the 2655B 1/2 and 2754 3/8 both shallow and deep using my smallest 3/8" and standard sized 1/2 impacts the differences being about 1/2" between the shallows and 3/4 on the deep

 

[DFB]

Don't be too hasty about those 9.0 batteries (what am I going to use THAT for).
If you've got the wet/dry vac, stick a 9.0 in it and you've got oodles of run time. Got a cordless Mil. grinder? A 5.0 is OK in it, but a 9 is going to be dynamite. Chew thru some wood studded with nails or screws and that sawzall will look like a champ with the 9. Cordless lights during a power outage? Run one on low and you can probably make a couple of nights before a recharge. And then there is the lawn equipment -- cordless string trimmer? A 9.0 is going to be just what you want with that.
Cheers,
Jim Don

Don't forget my new water transfer pump

I want two

 

[Savinyours]

I'll play

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[lucky3]

Just ordered the mid torque impact from Ohio tool. They said it's in stock.

 

[thugline]

Just ordered the mid torque impact from Ohio tool. They said it's in stock.

In stock or available for preorder? I'm also going to pick one of these up.

 

[dacan23]

I have used the 9.0 alot lately in the latest M18 flood light 2135-20, a 5.0 doesnt last long on high.

Don't be too hasty about those 9.0 batteries (what am I going to use THAT for).
If you've got the wet/dry vac, stick a 9.0 in it and you've got oodles of run time. Got a cordless Mil. grinder? A 5.0 is OK in it, but a 9 is going to be dynamite. Chew thru some wood studded with nails or screws and that sawzall will look like a champ with the 9. Cordless lights during a power outage? Run one on low and you can probably make a couple of nights before a recharge. And then there is the lawn equipment -- cordless string trimmer? A 9.0 is going to be just what you want with that.
Cheers,
Jim Don

 

[manwithtools]

My current collection...

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[bry@n]

Thats pretty cool.

I also just received this kit. $206 - charger & battery = $45 or so for sawzall. I am keeping them.
My other batteries are only 4ah and 2ah so the 9.0 is welcome.
Hopping for another coupon to get the Fuel cordless circular saw.

I just got the circular saw kit and will likely sell the saw. I bought for the battery.

 

[Distrophe]

"manwithtools" : Good set you have there in the back of what looks like a sidebyside. Nice!

I just got the circular saw kit and will likely sell the saw. I bought for the battery.

I'd do that if I already had a good circ saw. Decent way to make $50 or more. I haven't needed my own corded or cordless 1 yet.
I'm eyeing the 6.5" Fuel saw, it is left-sided I think. Not in a 9.0 kit for the same $250 it seems.

I might just break down and buy a $250 circ saw + 9.0 batt before they go away..... Well, Cpo among others sell on ebay also.

-------------------
CPO has the older 2663 impct wrench recon for only $135. Looks dated compared to the 2763.

The 2763 is only $180. . New 2663-20 is $170.

 

[DFB]

Dang it my M12 Rover light was giving me fits today especially with all its supposed mounting points the best way I needed it was high and upside down to get the proper angle. And it wasn't easy!

Earlier this morning seeing what appears to be a more adjustable light under the Ridgid moniker (and actually there are actually two different lights to compare but maybe we shouldn't go there ) I feel someone should ***** slap Milwaukee to why their offerings do not have similar advantages.


Just had to vent

 

[kctyphoon]

I agree the m12 rover seems very limited having no adjustments on the head.. that's actually one light I don't have a desire to get (yet)

Newest Milwaukee refurb listings.. the m12 right angle drill is $62.

http://www.cpomilwaukee.com/milwauk...kee-reconditioned-power-tools,default,sc.html

Cpo also has $20 off a $150 purchase of new Milwaukee stuff.. but not on the 9.0 promo stuff.

 

[DFB]

Good write up on the transfer pump

https://www.protoolreviews.com/tools/plumbing/milwaukee-m18-transfer pump-review/27652/

 

[Ign]

Dang it my M12 Rover light was giving me fits today especially with all its supposed mounting points the best way I needed it was high and upside down to get the proper angle. And it wasn't easy!

Earlier this morning seeing what appears to be a more adjustable light under the Ridgid moniker (and actually there are actually two different lights to compare but maybe we shouldn't go there ) I feel someone should ***** slap Milwaukee to why their offerings do not have similar advantages.


Just had to vent

Milwaukee is often quite good at overengineering aspects of their tools that really aren't useful while still ultimately ending up with fewer truly simple, useful advantages that budget brands like Ryobi (or maybe Ridgid) have.

It feels like sometimes they sit in a room with a think tank focusing on a given tool and just try too hard to be unique or different.

 

[kctyphoon]

Milwaukee is often quite good at overengineering aspects of their tools that really aren't useful while still ultimately ending up with fewer truly simple, useful advantages that budget brands like Ryobi (or maybe Ridgid) have.

It feels like sometimes they sit in a room with a think tank focusing on a given tool and just try too hard to be unique or different.

The first gen diagonals are a perfect example. It's like they were so determined on improving a simple tool that it actually wound up worse..

 

[dacan23]

Thought my CC might be charged today for the blower and weed wacker today since tomorrow is the expected pre-order ship date but sadly it was not....

 

[Frontierajl]

Thought my CC might be charged today for the blower and weed wacker today since tomorrow is the expected pre-order ship date but sadly it was not....

Funny, I almost wrote this exact thing last night then decided to wait until today to ask if anyone got a shipping confirmation lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[a52-830]

forgive me for not paging through the 330+ pages of this thread in search of my answer.

i just bought my first milwaukee fuel tool, a 2753 impact. it is a cute little thing, and hopefully is the monster that i have heard it to be.

looking over the tool , i notice that there is a square, two connector "port" on the "right" side of the base.

here is an image of the port (taken from a random ebay listing, cause it was just easier, ya know?):

View attachment 613869

i looked through the manual, and what it is for is so obvious, they dont even mention it in the Functional Description, where they point out where the trigger is.

anyway, i am sure that this is embarrassingly obvious. i appreciate your help.

 

[Buckgnarly]

forgive me for not paging through the 330+ pages of this thread in search of my answer.

i just bought my first milwaukee fuel tool, a 2753 impact. it is a cute little thing, and hopefully is the monster that i have heard it to be.

looking over the tool , i notice that there is a square, two connector "port" on the "right" side of the base.

here is an image of the port (taken from a random ebay listing, cause it was just easier, ya know?):

View attachment 613869

i looked through the manual, and what it is for is so obvious, they dont even mention it in the Functional Description, where they point out where the trigger is.

anyway, i am sure that this is embarrassingly obvious. i appreciate your help.

Bit holder.

 

[kctyphoon]

^^^ What he said.. it holds a 1/4" hex drive bit like you would use with the impact.

 

[icu2tsx]

Except it doesn't hold it that well...little touch and it falls off offen, but yeah bit holder.

 

[rmorse]

Wrong. It's for attaching a bayonet.

 

[ptgarcia]

I just got these today. Bought them for the batteries, really, as I already have one of these lights, and will likely sell the lights.