To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

The Milwaukee addiction thread! :)

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

MikeF2316

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Messages
9,605
Location
Thornhill, ON
I have the 2783 angle grinder and use it extensively for light fabrication. For my uses it's perfect. If I'm using it a lot, I'll get 20-30 min from a 5.0 battery, but I'm usually picking it up here and there for a minute or two at a time, so a pair of batteries can last me all day.

This is how I use mine too. Just a minute or two here and there. If you're using a grinder constantly, the inconvenience of a cord is not such a big deal.
 

Black300zx

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
782
Location
Elkton, Md
For auto/home DIY, what would you guys recommend? The new M12 FUEL™ Installation Drill/Driver Kit or a M12 FUEL Hammer Drill and Impact Driver Combo Kit

I'm wondering if it will be annoying switching out attachments on the 4-in-1 tool.

I've found the hammer drill/impact driver kit very useful. I've used the hammer drill to hang some shelving on our basement cinderblock walls with Tapcons and it handled a hole saw well enough to put in a new deadbolt in my garage door.

The 1/4" impact driver is incredibly useful for removing/reinstalling small M4 and M6 fasteners on my car, with power setting 1 being gently enough to put screws back into interior trim. I've also used it exclusively when driving screws or lags into studs. It really has some kick to it for a 12V driver.

The installation driver seems better geared towards assembly work in tight spaces. If you ever might need to drill concrete you'll be better off with the drill/driver kit. It's also nice having a drill bit chucked up in the drill with a bit chucked up in the driver for repetitive predrilling/installation work.
 
Last edited:

dacan23

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
2,804
Location
RI
The 4-1 install driver is not meant for any power, it only has 25 ft-lbs of torque versus about 110 ft-lbs for the Fuel hex impact. The install 4-1 is not a great household DIY tool unless all your doing is tightening cabinet hardware, building IKEA furniture, or drilling to hang pictures in drywall only.

For auto/home DIY, what would you guys recommend? The new M12 FUEL™ Installation Drill/Driver Kit or a M12 FUEL Hammer Drill and Impact Driver Combo Kit

I'm wondering if it will be annoying switching out attachments on the 4-in-1 tool.
 

Tbird22

Well-known member
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
179
Just the opposite actually. If the Impact is Fuel such as the High Torque model it will get more power out of the 3.0 HO where as the vacuum doesn't need the high output battery to produce more torque. It needs the longer run times of a bigger battery. If they're anything like their Ryobi little brothers, the 3.0HO and 5XC would be fairly close in runtime depending on device. I find the Ryobi 3ah HP+ outperforms the older 4aH HP batteries in all areas.



So the 3.0 HO on a impact wrench would be better than a 5.0? Assuming the high torque was designed for a 5.0 XC, could it benefit power wise (not runtime) from a 6.0 or 8.0 HO? I thought that if the tool was designed for a certain amp rating, a bigger battery just lengthens run time but does not provide more power


Sent from my iPhone using Garage Journal
 

Rickster

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
6,218
Location
SE PA
I had this on my Christmas list but I just couldn't wait!
 

Attachments

  • 20191112_164654.jpg
    20191112_164654.jpg
    80 KB · Views: 96

Ign

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
12,769
Location
Butte Peak ND
The release has evidently been pushed back to the first quarter of next year.

Yep, and for as long as this is taking, Milwaukee better not get it wrong.

At this rate if it's anything less than stellar they'll be a laughing stock, and the nailers are already not that well regarded
 

Ign

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
12,769
Location
Butte Peak ND
So the 3.0 HO on a impact wrench would be better than a 5.0? Assuming the high torque was designed for a 5.0 XC, could it benefit power wise (not runtime) from a 6.0 or 8.0 HO? I thought that if the tool was designed for a certain amp rating, a bigger battery just lengthens run time but does not provide more power


Sent from my iPhone using Garage Journal

Not necessarily, although the new packs like the 6.0 and 8.0 are muddying the water.

But generally, if a tool has to dig deep - even for a second or two - a deeper well is better.

Every tool pulls varying max amps and every useage situation is different, but "for best results" more ah is not gonna hurt.

Larger batts also stay in the "sweet spot" much longer, so while something like a 5.0 might give "peak" performance briefly a, say, 8.0 might mean fewer battery swaps throughout the day.

I'm not advocating running around with a 12.0 on every tool, just saying it's not cut 'n dry. Despite claims like "fade free performance" ALL the high draw tools at least start to suffer around 2 bars. It can happen gradually enough and be subtle enough that many users don't notice, but it can be the difference between "Wow I can't believe it did that" to "Geez, this tool is kinda disappointing."
 

DFB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
5,765
Location
Southern VT/Western Mass
Yep, and for as long as this is taking, Milwaukee better not get it wrong.

At this rate if it's anything less than stellar they'll be a laughing stock, and the nailers are already not that well regarded

I'll agree there and I'm waiting on it BIG TIME.

The NEW 18 has stellar reviews on plenty of other forums but not much info here.

I really do like my 16ga angle finish nailer and I've been using it daily. Its virtually flawless up against solid material. It makes soo many job so easy. I just did door stops Sunday for GF and always a bunch of other stuff at work . Everyone of the videos where some jackoff is bouncing it on board on table are meaningless though it will never set a fastener right...I've gone thru a box 2000 2/12" galvi's and partial box 1 1/2"

I would like the 18ga brad nailer for the option to pin down really short stuff like 3/4" brads on small projects at home but I have air and pneumatic are super cheap in comparison
 

jmhinkle

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Messages
452
Location
Portland, OR
So the 3.0 HO on a impact wrench would be better than a 5.0? Assuming the high torque was designed for a 5.0 XC, could it benefit power wise (not runtime) from a 6.0 or 8.0 HO? I thought that if the tool was designed for a certain amp rating, a bigger battery just lengthens run time but does not provide more power


Sent from my iPhone using Garage Journal

All the HO batteries have 21700 cells and will supply more power to the tools when they demand it. 21700 can charge and discharge faster than 18650 cells is the reason why. Tools that draw hard like most of the saws will see the biggest benefit. Any fuel tool capable of harnessing the power will see a difference if it demands it. Real world tests show the 3HO (single row) performing comparably to the 5XC (double row) in initial performance, but it dies faster as expected.

Like I stated a few posts back though the new HO batteries are enormous compared to the XC size. For example, the 6HO is roughly the same in dimensions as the 9HD. They are awkwardly large on a drill, driver or pistol grip style tool. There is definitely a trade off to be made and your tool choice will dictate it.
 

danny_barkley

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
800
Location
FL
All the HO batteries have 21700 cells and will supply more power to the tools when they demand it. 21700 can charge and discharge faster than 18650 cells is the reason why. Tools that draw hard like most of the saws will see the biggest benefit. Any fuel tool capable of harnessing the power will see a difference if it demands it. Real world tests show the 3HO (single row) performing comparably to the 5XC (double row) in initial performance, but it dies faster as expected.

Like I stated a few posts back though the new HO batteries are enormous compared to the XC size. For example, the 6HO is roughly the same in dimensions as the 9HD. They are awkwardly large on a drill, driver or pistol grip style tool. There is definitely a trade off to be made and your tool choice will dictate it.

I get confused over HO and HD?
 

jmhinkle

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Messages
452
Location
Portland, OR
I get confused over HO and HD?

HD was the labeling for the largest packs, originally the 9 then 12, at first. With the converison to 21700 cells, HO will be the naming for batteries with those cells going forward including the 12. I expect the HD naming to fade away, along with the 9.0 battery because of the HO series. In the meantime, the 9HD and older stock of the 12HD will still carry the HD name until newer models just stop having it.
 

danny_barkley

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
800
Location
FL
HD was the labeling for the largest packs, originally the 9 then 12, at first. With the converison to 21700 cells, HO will be the naming for batteries with those cells going forward including the 12. I expect the HD naming to fade away, along with the 9.0 battery because of the HO series. In the meantime, the 9HD and older stock of the 12HD will still carry the HD name until newer models just stop having it.

Thanx!
 

mc4life27

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
404
All the HO batteries have 21700 cells and will supply more power to the tools when they demand it. 21700 can charge and discharge faster than 18650 cells is the reason why. Tools that draw hard like most of the saws will see the biggest benefit. Any fuel tool capable of harnessing the power will see a difference if it demands it. Real world tests show the 3HO (single row) performing comparably to the 5XC (double row) in initial performance, but it dies faster as expected.



Like I stated a few posts back though the new HO batteries are enormous compared to the XC size. For example, the 6HO is roughly the same in dimensions as the 9HD. They are awkwardly large on a drill, driver or pistol grip style tool. There is definitely a trade off to be made and your tool choice will dictate it.



That’s why I like using my impact with the 3.0 ho and just keep an extra with me as back up. Since I use my tools daily an ale y living with my tools in a way I think of it as a race car. Make it as fast and as lightest as possible that the job allows it to be but I have the bigger batteries on stand by in case I happen to need them. Another example is my 7 1/4 rear Handel cir saw. Most of the time I’m not cutting a ton at any given moment ( well for the most part that is) plus I’m in situations where I’m on a deck that’s half way built or on a ladder and using the 3.0 battery cuts the weight down a bunch and makes it super nice especially when my old saw was a 50 year anniversary edition skill that they claimed weight 25-27 pounds. Now if I find my self needing to do a ton of cuts I just throw in my 6.0 or my 9.0 ho and away I go. Typically after I already drained one of my 3.0. I have enough batteries to get me through the day and if I some how drain the 8 or so I have I can away grab one of the back ups we have on the site since most of my crew is running Milwaukee. But I fo notice a difference using the high outs over the non ho.


Sent from my iPhone using The Garage Journal mobile app
 

mc4life27

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
404
For auto/home DIY, what would you guys recommend? The new M12 FUEL[emoji769] Installation Drill/Driver Kit or a M12 FUEL Hammer Drill and Impact Driver Combo Kit

I'm wondering if it will be annoying switching out attachments on the 4-in-1 tool.



I don’t find switching out the chicks annoying since it’s nice being able to carry them with me instead of the two drills. Now when I’m using my m12 I tend to grasp my installation driver Along with my fuel impact if I’m running a lot of screws in. Now if I’m doing a lot of med to bigger sized holes I grab either my fuel m12 or fuel m18 hammer drill or d add one times my m12 sds fuel for the Constance drilling.


Sent from my iPhone using The Garage Journal mobile app
 

DFB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
5,765
Location
Southern VT/Western Mass
Hows those USB lights you guys all bought working out still. I have the 2114 been using it at work lately and I'm amazed at the runtime and how well it holds a charge. Must have got a real good one :D cuz I remember reading some complaining about loosing charge over time with non use. To be honest I can't even recall the last time I fully charged it had to be early to mid summer and its still green when I checked it and I just plugged it in to be sure and went green instantly.

I hook the carabineer clip on one my front belt loops and it lights up real good a dark work space while I have tools in my hands. By being in front there is virtually no shadows as I'm not standing in the way of the light beam
 

logixjock

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
636
Location
Sturgeon, MO
I recently bought a NON fuel M12 1/4" ratchet and am looking for a rubber boot for it. I can't seem to find one anywhere. Does anyone have a source for one?
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Shaners256

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
110
Location
Milwaukee
HD was the labeling for the largest packs, originally the 9 then 12, at first. With the converison to 21700 cells, HO will be the naming for batteries with those cells going forward including the 12. I expect the HD naming to fade away, along with the 9.0 battery because of the HO series. In the meantime, the 9HD and older stock of the 12HD will still carry the HD name until newer models just stop having it.

Actually, to make it a bit more confusing, HD is only referring to 3 rows of cells, so the 12.0 is actually an HO HD pack.
 

jmhinkle

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Messages
452
Location
Portland, OR
Picked up my Ace deal on the way home from work this morning. Already have my red/black Kaizen foam ready to make tool specific cutouts.

wfo6Wc7.jpg
 

unknownroad

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
206
Location
WNC
So what are the thoughts on the 2457 non-fuel M12 ratchet- enough torque to be worth getting for a DIYer, or too weak (35 ft-lb) to bother with unless you have a specific task involving a lot of low-torque fasteners?

Part of a set on today's HD deal of the day- $99 for ratchet, battery, charger, bag, and screwdriver- cheaper than the bare tool price for the ratchet!
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Milwauk...h-Battery-Charger-Tool-Bag-2401-21R/310446584
 

JimDon

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
602
Somewhere, way back, someone posted a pix showing that the Snap-on rubber boot fit the head of the non-fuel Milwaukee ratchet perfectly, but I'm not sure exactly where that post is. You may want to check the Snap-On website and order one from them. Also, I don't think the boot from SO was pretty inexpensive. Hope that helps somewhat.
JimD
 

GForceJunky

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
562
I've searched but can't seem to find anything - does anyone know of any good hard case solutions for the M18 Super Sawzall? I have a decent M18 collection and have managed to pretty much only buy tools that have hard cases (except things like my various lights, transfer pump, radio, etc.) except for the Super Sawzall and it's driving me off the wall to have it just hanging around. The old Sawzalls had nice big cases (a little overly bulky, truthfully) with room for a charger, a few batteries, and some blades, and so I was hoping someone has a solution to store the latest and greatest Super Sawzall.
 

danny_barkley

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
800
Location
FL
Actually, to make it a bit more confusing, HD is only referring to 3 rows of cells, so the 12.0 is actually an HO HD pack.

My you are right, that is confusing! :headscrat

Can you explain what you mean here to us previously Yellow folks who are doing a conversion?
 

Shaners256

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
110
Location
Milwaukee
My you are right, that is confusing! :headscrat

Can you explain what you mean here to us previously Yellow folks who are doing a conversion?

There are three main sizes of batteries.

1 row of cells - slim pack = CP pack
2 rows of cells - "normal" pack = XC pack
3 rows of cells - 9.0 and 12.0 = HD pack

There are now 4 different HO (High output packs)
1 CP 3.0 pack
1 XC 6.0 pack
1 XC 8.0 pack
1 HD 12.0 pack

Here's a much more detailed explanation https://toolguyd.com/milwaukee-m18-cordless-power-tool-battery-sizes-explained/
 

danny_barkley

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
800
Location
FL

techieman33

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
1,096
Location
Kansas
So what are the thoughts on the 2457 non-fuel M12 ratchet- enough torque to be worth getting for a DIYer, or too weak (35 ft-lb) to bother with unless you have a specific task involving a lot of low-torque fasteners?

Part of a set on today's HD deal of the day- $99 for ratchet, battery, charger, bag, and screwdriver- cheaper than the bare tool price for the ratchet!
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Milwauk...h-Battery-Charger-Tool-Bag-2401-21R/310446584

That’s a pretty good deal. A lot of people prefer the smaller head size on the regular model. IMO is has plenty of torque. And if it doesn’t it works like a regular ratchet so you can break the bolt free manually and then let it spin the bolt out.
 

RKA

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
1,744
Location
NJ
unknownroad, I'll echo techieman's thoughts. I have the non-fuel and like it because the head is compact. I don't need a lot of torque for a cordless ratchet since I'm using the motor for running nuts and bolts, not loosening and tightening as he mentioned. I did add an extended reach fuel which has a much larger head and I'll tell you I won't be getting rid of the non-fuel anytime soon. If it broke tomorrow I would replace it.
 

Lisamelting

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
148
Location
Massachusetts
The 2457 has become my most used tool. The small size allows the tool to fit into some pretty tight spots. There has never been a time where I wished it was larger or more powerful.
 

Crabman

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2017
Messages
3,836
Location
Alexandria, VA/Dameron, MD
Unknown,

So what are the thoughts on the 2457 non-fuel M12 ratchet- enough torque to be worth getting for a DIYer, or too weak (35 ft-lb) to bother with unless you have a specific task involving a lot of low-torque fasteners?

Part of a set on today's HD deal of the day- $99 for ratchet, battery, charger, bag, and screwdriver- cheaper than the bare tool price for the ratchet!
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Milwauke...-21R/310446584

The 2457 is a great tool, like Lisamelting, my most used cordless tool.

As techieman said, the torque is ok, you can always hand torque.

I use the driver all the time too.

I think that is a great deal.

Good luck finding what works.

Bruce
 

DFB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
5,765
Location
Southern VT/Western Mass
So what are the thoughts on the 2457 non-fuel M12 ratchet- enough torque to be worth getting for a DIYer, or too weak (35 ft-lb) to bother with unless you have a specific task involving a lot of low-torque fasteners?

Part of a set on today's HD deal of the day- $99 for ratchet, battery, charger, bag, and screwdriver- cheaper than the bare tool price for the ratchet!
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Milwauk...h-Battery-Charger-Tool-Bag-2401-21R/310446584

Handy tool to have, and its always done what I needed. For general work using it as locked ratchet to first break a fastener loose then quickly spin it off

And I do have one of each Fuel and non fuel both in 3/8".

Yup that's a great deal don't hesitate
 

DFB

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
5,765
Location
Southern VT/Western Mass
I read on a FB Milwaukee group page that new MX power generator is going to be $4500 as 2 battery kit :eyecrazy:


This **** is getting crazy lookie what Makidoo come up with a battery backpack

Shoot you could run deck screws all day and never stop :spit:


Goofy leaf blower guys could do the whole neighborhood :lol_hitti
 

Attachments

  • Mikadoo backpack.jpg
    Mikadoo backpack.jpg
    114.1 KB · Views: 62

theoldwizard1

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
43,106
Location
SE MI
For auto/home DIY, what would you guys recommend ?
Depending on what kind of automotive work you are doing NEITHER may be acceptable. They are not going to do lug nuts !

Personally, I would rather have 2 tools. Also, because I do a lot of small engine/light automotive work, I bought the first gen M12 3/8" impact and a 3/8" to 1/4" hex adapter. Works great for me.
 

theoldwizard1

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
43,106
Location
SE MI
But generally, if a tool has to dig deep - even for a second or two - a deeper well is better.
.
.
.
Larger batts also stay in the "sweet spot" much longer,
I am learning this the "hard way". I need a bigger M12 battery. I was hoping to go with the 3.0 Ah, but I probably should get the 6.0 Ah.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom