sberry
Banned
I have some in 3/8, bought them off the shelf at the parts stores, ATD for something like 12$ for 3 piece. They worked so good we got another set.
This is a good case for looking for reasonable price, there is no need to do without and spending 12 or 15$ on a set takes so much of the pain out of it, if you find something super useful or demanding then upgrade it a little.What kind of work are you doing at your Ford dealer Wild?
I'm seriously looking at wobble plus, but can't quite justify it...yet.
Am I right in assuming the wobble plus, when you push it, you don't need to be straight on (square) with it only one side can be used to drive so long as it's pushed into the socket's drive?
Kind of hard to describe, do all 4 sides of the square drive part need to be inside the socket's drive or can it work well without slipping on fewer than 4, even as little as 1 edge making contact?
Everything from front ends and brakes to engines and electricalWhat kind of work are you doing at your Ford dealer Wild?
I'm seriously looking at wobble plus, but can't quite justify it...yet.
Must be.I think it's a matter of not having to have both types of extension sets, dual purpose.
So how are you needing a wobble to get to something that a straight extension is too long, then suddenly have clearance to get at it straight on? I get some things don't have the length/depth but for that many people to be loving these, I'm clearly missing something.
Where I have found the wobble plus to be of most benefit is bellhousing bolts. Especially on rear wheel drive V8 cars. I used to try to get those out with a different extension/ujoint combination on each bolt. With the wobble plus it mostly eliminates the changing setup for each situation.
this thread got me to go out and try mine with my impact sockets. With the detent in the hole of the socket the extension wouldn't lock straight, but with the detent ball out and touching the flat inside of the socket, it would. I believe my chromes didn't have an issue like that though.
fwiw, it seems to me that my snappy wobble plus extensions seem to work best with my snappy sockets...i may just be imagining it, but yeah
Do these guys have proprietary tolerances or somethin?fwiw, it seems to me that my snappy wobble plus extensions seem to work best with my snappy sockets...i may just be imagining it, but yeah
Every time I come across that situation, I usually fix it with this below, minus the wobble part.There are many different scenarios, but let me give you one:
If you are working in a restricted area, maybe very little access to a bolt head, can't see it from the side you are working, for example. Just getting a socket with a fixed extension on the bolt head can be challenging. The longer the extension, the harder it can be.
With a wobble plus, you attach the socket to the extension in wobble mode without having to worry about the extension, then attach the socket onto the bolt head. Once it is home, then you can align the extension and ratchet, and with a push, move into fixed mode.
Point I'm trying to make is, sometimes you use the wobble plus not just as a combination of 2 tools, but rather, using both capabilities on the same operation.
I didn't mean to come off as argumentative, I just only work on smaller imports and I think that has a lot to do with why I haven't come across the need for one of these. I'm glad a solution exists for those that do need them.The best setup is when you use a flex head ratchet with a universal joint and a wobble plus extension on that, then a universal joint with a wobble socket on the end of it. There's no bolt you can't reach!
Are you talking about how a SO socket actually seats itself all the way down when using it in the straight position, but when you use a different brand, the socket doesn't seat all the way down?
If so, that happens with my 1/4" Ko-ken wobble-fix extensions when I use a really shallow socket. When the socket and extension is of the same brand, the socket seats itself properly, fully engaged.
That all has to do with the construction of the socket--how deep the square forming die is pressed during manufacturing.
![]()
Nepros, on the left, has the most shallow square portion (SO has the deepest). I believe Nepros designed it that way so that a socket doesn't get pushed into the fixed position. To use it in the fixed position you have to apply forward pressure to maintain engagement onto the square. This alleviates the frustration that can arise from using the more "standard" design of wobble-plus extensions.
I recall Ko-ken has the patent for the wobble-fix design, and that any brand using the design is paying royalties to Ko-ken. ....but this was years ago.
There are many different scenarios, but let me give you one:
If you are working in a restricted area, maybe very little access to a bolt head, can't see it from the side you are working, for example. Just getting a socket with a fixed extension on the bolt head can be challenging. The longer the extension, the harder it can be.
With a wobble plus, you attach the socket to the extension in wobble mode without having to worry about the extension, then attach the socket onto the bolt head. Once it is home, then you can align the extension and ratchet, and with a push, move into fixed mode.
Point I'm trying to make is, sometimes you use the wobble plus not just as a combination of 2 tools, but rather, using both capabilities on the same operation.
Every time I come across that situation, I usually fix it with this below, minus the wobble part.
I didn't mean to come off as argumentative, I just only work on smaller imports and I think that has a lot to do with why I haven't come across the need for one of these. I'm glad a solution exists for those that do need them.