I wonder if I can simply go to 6" where the post feet will be.
I actually meant I had planned on digging out a footer for where the feet of the lift would sit. Appreciate the feedback. A 10k lift would be the largest lift I would need for my applications...
Having one part of a continuous slab that is significantly thicker than another increases your chances of cracking - in the area that is thickened. The engineering behind this is non-intuitive (because concrete is a heterogeneous material and not a homogeneous material, like metal) but I can explain it if you are interested.
Some folks here have reported that they have had good results thickening part of the slab with a slow, gradual taper, which would greatly help alleviate some of the concern with cracking - but it may not be necessary; depending on the thickness you are planning.
Reasons to thicken the slab would be to make sure you have the depth for the anchor bolts to attach. There's no need for additional thickness for strength. (Because certain thickening strategies can lead to cracking, they actually work opposite from what is intended.) The physics behind this are more straight forward:
- The 2 post lift doesn't put any significant amount of additional vertical stress on the concrete pad than a car parked directly on top of it. (A car or truck sits on the pad and
all that weight is transferred to the pad already by 4 small contact patches of the tires. The two post lift has a large base plate on the bottom, which disperses the loads similarly.) If you take the weight of the system and divide it by the size of the contact patches or base plates, then you will get the vertical stress on the pad. (The numbers work out flush between a car/truck parked directly on the pad vs. on the lift.)
- The big stresses the 2 post lift puts on the concrete pad are bending stresses where the post meets the pad. (Side-to-side and forward-to-back.) These stresses are resisted by a well finished pad, continuously supported by a well compacted base underneath.