To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Why do smoke detectors have to be wired in sequence?

Ryland

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
294
Location
Rhode Island
Why do they have to be wired in sequence instead of outwards from a central point? I.e:

In Sequence:
S - S - S

Not:
S
|
S - S -S
|
S

Since all reds need to be tied together I don't see why it matters. Can someone explain this?

Thanks.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

oleguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
273
the red wires are the sence lead.when one goes off the all go off to alert you any where in the house.doesn't matter just so all red wires get tied together.
 
OP
R

Ryland

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
294
Location
Rhode Island
The instructions I found via google always said they were in sequence so that only 2 wires were in each junction box.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

oleguy

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
273
that is just the normal way to do it,not that it cannot be done other wise as they are in paralell and not series.
 
OP
R

Ryland

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
294
Location
Rhode Island
Ok, thanks. The main reason Im asking is that I need to add smoke detectors to my 2nd floor due to an addition (and thus the fire marshall says I need to be brought up to code in the old part of the house. I currently have one at the top of the stairs (marked O) and need to wire new ones in the locations marked S. Realistically the space between O and S2 is only about 3 feet as is the space between O and S3 so I wouldn't waste much wire keeping them in series.

S1--O-S2
|
S3
 

Grumpy365

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
623
Location
Brazoria County Texas
You need to run 3 conductor to the smokes. They are interconnected so any fire alarm will set off the whole house (That is code as of a couple of years ago) Code also says smokes have to be dual powered (battery and 110V)
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom