To correct the misinformation in case someone stumbles on it. Why do u ask? Is it against the rules or does it bother u?
Neither.
I just didn't realize you were on a personal crusade to right all the wrongs on the electrical forum. If that's the case.....
175% FLC is actually the max size for dual element fuses. A breaker can be a max of 250% FLC...
Thats not what the code says. See T430.52. It states a max size of 175% FLC for dual element fuses and 250% FLC for inverse time breakers....
Actually, that's only the half of it. Those are the maximum table values, but if they do not correspond to a standard breaker size you can pick the next breaker size up. And you are allowed to go past that maximum table value.
On top of that, if that previously chosen fuse size blows on startup of a motor, you can now use 225% as the
absolute maximum instead of 175%.
For example, 22 amps x 225%=49.5 amps.
You must round
down, instead of up like before which gives you a 45 amp fuse.
A breaker is the same story.
22 x 250%=55 amps=60 amp breaker.
You are allowed to round up to the next breaker size. Now if it trips you are allowed an absolute maximum of 400% for loads 100 amps and less, but you must round down.
22 x 400%=88 amps=80 amp breaker.
Is this "table amps" or what is on the nameplate? Code requires you to use "table amps" for conductor sizing. Sorry dont have a code book in front of me but I think it is table 430.250.
yes, 22a IS table amps for 7.5hp 230v rated motor. And the correct table is T430.52 not .250!
I don't see why you are trying to correct him here, he listed the right table for motor amps.