You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You can Trust your car!
- Thread starter Denee007
- Start date
One of her posts said 6 feet
So how much water did the Mustang sustain inside? Carpet and door panels ruined? That's always a mess to clean up. Keep us up to date.
Billy
Cougar
Well-known member
For some reason pics are not showing.
ambenz
Well-known member
Dang, long time since a update. I was going thru old threads I am watching and found yours.
Wonder if you finished the pony? Can we get a update Denee?
Wonder if you finished the pony? Can we get a update Denee?
driftpin
Well-known member
Yes, I am interested in hearing an update. I'd be interested to hear about the driving dynamics of the TR-6/Mazda, as-in, what kind of performance do you get out of it? I think the TR-6 and the MGB are the best of the 1970's British cars. I had friends who had both, and of-course, there were their predecessors. One of my older brothers had a TR-3, a co-worker and friend had I think three MGB's, friends had a bugeye Sprite, TR-4's, MG Midgets, Triumph Spitfires (I had one I flipped for $) a Jensen-Healy, and a TR-7. There were others too like a twin-cam MG-A coupe.
My assumption is that the Mazda engine would make that even more-enjoyable to operate. I'm guessing ~8 seconds 0-60mph and under 16 sec for the 1/4-mi. but of course, those aren't the best reasons to have a TR-6, as fun-to-drive should be #1.
Some interesting stuff going on in your thread, and 'inquiring minds want to-know.'
My assumption is that the Mazda engine would make that even more-enjoyable to operate. I'm guessing ~8 seconds 0-60mph and under 16 sec for the 1/4-mi. but of course, those aren't the best reasons to have a TR-6, as fun-to-drive should be #1.
Some interesting stuff going on in your thread, and 'inquiring minds want to-know.'