nailheadmatt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2021
- Messages
- 147
why not
why not just admit you're wrong, instead of just talking in circles? i respected you until this point. "opinion" is a statement based on preference. ignoring compared factual data between two objects is ignorance. you can park a kia next to a rolls royce and you can say, "i like the kia better." that would be an entitled opinion. to say that they are both the same quality is not opinion, its a wrong statement.Or are at least more interested in creating criteria for toolbox assessments based on construction features than others! It seems necessary to emphasize that me expressing that I have not considered Plomb boxes noticeably inferior in reply to Beemer is not the same as me arguing with you that they're made as well as boxes that Snap-on and Blackhawk were issuing. My statement has no impact on your empirical observations and conclusions, any more than your empirical observations and conclusions have any impact on my statement. Maybe the boxes are good enough. Maybe I don't overload them. Maybe I have them underloaded. Maybe the extra material and stiffeners is overkill. Or maybe they really aren't made as well as other contemporary boxes. If you can't see how that doesn't change my observation that I have never found them noticeably inferior - experientially, in use, you should probably ignore me rather than fall further prey to Rousseau's dictum about last resorts.
Good questions! That have already outstripped the boundaries of my interest, however.







