WWheeler
Well-known member
Milwaukee looking to retake the cordless impact max torque title away from Dewalt's DCF900 ...
Wow - no stock anywhere around here...I sold my 2767 and 2 5.0s to a new kid in the shop I'm at who's just starting off. So I get the upgrade and help out someone who could use it. Win/win.
I don't see your point. The M12 stubby does one type of job and the High-Torque does completely other type of work. For car top of engine work you can't beat the M12 stubby. Small, light and really powerful for the size.I sold my 2767 because it was too damn bulky/heavy, wanted tri-lights and the Mid Gen3 was doing everything I wanted.
This might make me ditch my M12 Stubby and get the 2967 and a Forge battery at some point...
I currently have a Mid Gen3, which isn't really much bigger than the Stubby and far grumpier (it came later than the Stubby). So I'd lose a bit of flexibility and weight savings for a grump machine.I don't see your point. The M12 stubby does one type of job and the High-Torque does completely other type of work. For car top of engine work you can't beat the M12 stubby. Small, light and really powerful for the size.


My mouse has been hovering over the "Add to Cart" button over the last day or so...i have the gen 3 mid, the stubby and the gen 1 hi torque. unless its a heck of alot of more power I dont see a reason to bother. the hi torque is so large its hard to fit in spots.
frankly i find the 3/8 stubby the most useful. my only wish is they would make the stubby as compact as the makita, its quite big for its size overall.
I'd guess being a little lighter and a lot shorter will help it. TTC gave it a decent wrist-breaking score (for a High Torque).I like the headlights. I like the tapered snout. Wonder what the balance is like? My 2767 is a ***** when it comes to balance and ergo. Honestly I prefer oldschool air tools as opposed to the 2767, but what it lacks in balance it makes up for in convenience.