Very nice Grizz. Looks like your example has my 7 bits plus the saw, gouge, and reamer. [I may have all these ends on other styles of combination handles though
Very nice Grizz. Looks like your example has my 7 bits plus the saw, gouge, and reamer. [I may have all these ends on other styles of combination handles though
Some manufacturers sold different levels of kits, yours may have only come with 7. Ss you look at the MF examples here, a different number of bits per handle.] I'm keeping my eyes open and maybe I'll find a more complete model



Does that unit have a patent date on it? Should be JAN 14, 1868. And is it quite large? It looks like the type we have seen with many different markings, including Millers Falls, Springfield, RED DEVIL, and others, believed to have been made, at least at first, by Millers Falls, and then by many others or perhaps for many others. See last of page 4 into page 5. Yours is the first BHM, if memory serves.As I have continued sorting, cleaning, and identifying old tools in the garage, I found a second one. This one by Bridgeport Hardware
That's a wonderful story and a wonderful keepsake!And this one I can trace the provenance of. In the early 1900's my great grandfather was, among other things, a violin maker/repairer in Dunkirk NY. I know this from family history and this advertisement a relative has.
Looking at the add from miller falls someone else posted in post #202, it seems almost an exact match of the miller falls #5 tool which does include what appears to be a file and even a similar saw. Mine seems to contain a countersink instead of the reamer though. Mine is marked, "THE BRIDGEPORT HDWE MFG CORP." but no date I see. I'll try to post better pictures and check with a magnifying glass after I get it cleaned up.Does that unit have a patent date on it? Should be JAN 14, 1868. And is it quite large? It looks like the type we have seen with many different markings, including Millers Falls, Springfield,
Like you, I've only ever seen the fishing reel looking type. That's cool....but this the first I’ve found of this type.







both came from Portland too. You mean you don’t hang on every post I make? At least you got the third bit. Did you try Search This Thread for GP? I even spelled it out for future searchers.It figures. I get ALL the way through a thread, not seeing what I am looking for, until the second to the last post.
Today, in the Portland West Hills, I found this little jobber in a very posh house estate sale. A Goodell Pratt #231.
Nice find, Tom, and I agree.Today I found one at a tag sale that would seem to resemble the Fray's patent model at the start of the thread although I invite any corrections or comments.
My first thought as well! Flared, was the word I had in mind, though. I wonder if they did that on purpose with the intent of improving the grip. If not, I wonder if it would flare more evenly if pounded on give the original shape and hollow cavity. The difference between Beemer's and RTM's is stark.Yours looks a bit mushroomed.
The forum descends in time from page 1 to page n. When a thread (topic) has new activity, such as your post #227 in this one, it goes to the top of page 1. When another thread has newer activity, it bumps it. And so on. That pushes threads down the page, eventually to page 2, and buries them fairly fast thereafter. Until someone replies, which bumps it to page 1 again.Oh, and I'm still trying to figure out how to navigate this site. I see several years of posts on this topic alone.
I wouldn't be so quick to give it away! It appears to be an example of a rare special "Handikit" model intended for dual-use as a puppet!I never looked at this closely before, and assumed that the paint job was factory. On closer examination, it appears to be hand painted, but a damn good job of it. It is a Buell Brothers.


If by "into" you mean I collect them, I am fond of them, I am interested enough to devote some research into identifying them, and I started a thread dedicated to them so that others with a similar interest can share and collectively pursue them in a more organized way, yes. (If you're still trying to figure this place out, that's what we do around here on the GJ Vintage board. Threads are fun, but they also accrue an encyclopedic quality over time, that in many cases exceeds the depth and breadth of any and all other references on the internet or in print on a particular topic.) They are not the sole object of the "passion" RJ refers to, and maybe not even Top 10 in terms of types of vintage or antique tools I collect, though. "The Lugzsonian" is just a funny name riffing on the much shorter nickname version of my username that a friend gave to the basement of my house, where my collection resides, and it stuck. You can take a quick virtual 'walking tour' within the first 5 or 6 pages here.So, Private Lugnutz, I take it you are into these tool handles, also?
It has utility! Do you have any annoying neighborhood kids? You could shove the tack claw and a screwdriver bit into the chuck to give the clown legs and drill the gimlet and awl into the body for arms and then you would have a Consumer Products Safety Commission disapproved toy with which to test Darwin's theory on survival of the fittest! Science!!I don’t collect tools for the value of them, but for their utility.
I know we've had this not mutually exclusive discussion before, but just to re-emphasize, this hobby has its strict utilitarians, and I'm clearly not one of them, but it also has plenty of shade tree mechanics who also like collecting vintage tools they have no intention of using.After reading your other post, I conclude that I am of a different stripe.
Somebody else. I already have a Buell Bros. If I ran into it in the wild, I would probably snag it just for novelty grins, but I'm not interested enough to have it shipped. Thanks for thinking of me, though.I’m also a man of my word. If you want it, you can have it. Or somebody else can.
Snerk.Do you have any annoying neighborhood kids? You could shove the tack claw and a screwdriver bit into the chuck to give the clown legs and drill the gimlet and awl into the body for arms and then you would have a Consumer Products Safety Commission disapproved toy with which to test Darwin's theory on survival of the fittest! Science!!
That's not the only thing I pulled, but RJ's leg was resistant. As was Old Radar's. And yours. Apparently that post needed a well-placed tongue-in-cheel and devil emoji.Then Lugz pulls out the advertisement page for it.
