It's just strange that people thought $45 for Malcos were too expensive, but $80 for Snap-On is an amazing deal, because warranty.
Does a warranty cover abuse? By their nature, locking pliers are often abused, and used in unintended or even destructive ways. Even if the warranty does cover that, it certainly won't cover lost or stolen pliers.
I could by 7 or 8 Bremens for the same price, and not worry about losing them.
The Malcos were vastly superior to everything else in the PF tests. If you need the best to get the job done on time for your paycheck, then they are worth the $ based on that. And if you are buying from SO and get a warranty, then it totally makes sense.
If a Bremen costs 15% as much, and doesn't do the job, how does that help the purchaser that needs to get a job done in a specified time to make $? That is the entire point of the Malcos. If you absolutely need the best, or just want it, then they are it. If you aren't making money with them, and think that something that doesn't work, and costs 15% as much as something that will do the job is a sensible purchase, then buy that. It's not like you can put two Bremens on a rusted nut to hold it instead of one Malco. It either works or it doesn't, and that's the point of the Malcos. Yes, the price is high, but for some people they are worth it.
Snap On warranties impact sockets and screwdrivers for normal wear. Why wouldn't they warranty locking pliers? Gripping a nut and it spinning and wearing out the teeth isn't abuse, it's normal wear and tear. Cracking the tip off of a slotted screwdriver while using it as a prybar is clearly abuse, and yet SO typically will replace that.







