craftsman creep
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2022
- Messages
- 300

I prefer it over my Snapons
I have heard that the ratchet head is more compact on some of the matco ratchets.Why ?
Spot on.I've been under the assumption that the "t" designation in the part number comes from the time when Armstrong made those ratchets for Matco since the "t" no longer is present in the current AJ made ratchets. The current version of that ratchet should just be BFR118G. The weird thing though is none of the soft grips in the BFR118 ratchets seems to be available. Only the chrome handle can be ordered. It might be worth reaching out to Matco to find out what is going on there.
BFR118


It’s much smoother, and feels better in my hand. I have three or maybe four SnapOn ratchets in various styles that are about that size, but seem to grab the Matco most often.Why ?
Actually, Cornwell is a unicorn, the mystical thing that supposedly exists. Kinda like seeing bigfoot.Matco is the red haired stepchild of tool trucks. No, correction, that's actually Cornwell. Once in awhile Matco hits a homerun and their ratchets and toolboxes are both excellent.
Why ?
It’s much smoother, and feels better in my hand.



I guess I'm one of the weirdos too. I like how the comfort grips feel, I like that they have longer sizes than everyone else, and I like their locking mechanism best. Plus they come in purple now, which is a win for me.Interesting, I thought I was the only weirdo who liked my Matco ratchets more than my Snap-ons. Good to see.
The Matco 88T are really good ratchets. Yes, they come from a "loser" tool truck company, but they are really good.
IMO, we've kinda reached "peak ratchet", where even a cheap Home Depot ratchet will shear the anvil, like the SO, and at a statistically similar value, at 20% of the price. And essentially meet, or exceed the SO, in all the other test variables.
If you actually value data, and not "it feels better", in the PF tests the SO dual 80 is in the top few ratchets for strength; but it's generally in the middle of the pack in everything else. If you have a SO driver and easy warranty, sure, maybe it makes sense over the years for a free rebuild kit, and especially for the super long lengths; they will break, if you want them to. But for the rest of us, there's no reason to buy a SO ratchet (or a Matco) unless you get a smoking deal, and it's a longer length that's not available in the other brands like GW. Typically the Matco 88T are cheaper on Ebay than SO, from what I've found.
IDK about peak-ratchet being reached, but I agree it's hard to get garbage anymore.
I also like the 88 tooth matco, although if we're talking about just the mechanism I prefer the dual 80. Actually I probably like the SK round head the most, issue being they don't fit in a lot of places. Matco has the best locking flex mechanism on the market by far. Slim, easy to use, allows locked and unlocked use.
It's a little bit like visiting an alien space ship. Nobody really believes you when you tell the story of stepping on a small Cornwell truck.Actually, Cornwell is a unicorn, the mystical thing that supposedly exists. Kinda like seeing bigfoot.
Matco is the brand everyone like to hate for whatever reason. I like their stuff overall.
It's a little bit like visiting an alien space ship. Nobody really believes you when you tell the story of stepping on a small Cornwell truck.


Gear wrench 88T and 90T are my go to ratchets in locking flex head flavor.
I own all the others and I am as tool snobby as they come.
I have all of the other premium brands (Facom, Hazet, Nepros, Snap-On, etc) and use these 90% of the time.
All I see is side-****. . .
How does one unsee this?!?
The GW 90T is essentially the same as the Matco 88T internally. The gears and pawls interchange on 1/4 and 3/8 and function fine. Both gears are within a few thousandths of each other in diameter and height. The Matco design is better in that it uses a machined step for the cover plate to sit on, where the GW just lets it sit on the gear. This is irrelevant as far as function, but shows attention to detail and additional cost. But not 3-4X additional cost
I'd have all GW 90T, but both Matco and SO have a selection of longer ratchets that GW doesn't offer, especially in 1/4 and 3/8, so I've been buying the longer SO and Matco ones on Ebay when I can get a deal.
I could not tell a difference when I compared the Matco against the GW 90T locking. I sort of like the thinner GW comfort grip handle, too. The Matco is beefier, but the thin profile of the GW has its advantages.
I agree, GW needs to offer Extra Long sizes.
So, if you expect the "if I can break what you can make" warranty, you need to talk to Snap On, and take out the wallet.
I'm not asking for GW to make longer sizes. And they shouldn't . I'm actually shocked they make a 24" flex head 1/2 drive.
The issue is that if they made a 12"+ 1/4 drive, 20"+ 3/8 drive.... people will break them, and expect a new one for free. Cause, "this is 'merica, you owe me a new one". For some reason. Even if I paid 25% of the tool truck price, I expect a new one because my fat *** managed to break something by putting 2X the actual max design force on it. No. That shouldn't be the way it works. Even I can break a 12" 1/4 drive ratchet, and I weigh 165 lbs. So, if you expect the "if I can break what you can make" warranty, you need to talk to Snap On, and take out the wallet.
I own all the longest ratchets matco makes. Other than the anvil failing in my 1/2 I’ve not had one break from pulling on it as hard as I can. The 1/4 is for access not torque, longer handle means less for to accomplish the same task. Some people know how to use tools and you shouldn’t project on them.I'm not asking for GW to make longer sizes. And they shouldn't . I'm actually shocked they make a 24" flex head 1/2 drive.
The issue is that if they made a 12"+ 1/4 drive, 20"+ 3/8 drive.... people will break them, and expect a new one for free. Cause, "this is 'merica, you owe me a new one". For some reason. Even if I paid 25% of the tool truck price, I expect a new one because my fat *** managed to break something by putting 2X the actual max design force on it. No. That shouldn't be the way it works. Even I can break a 12" 1/4 drive ratchet, and I weigh 165 lbs. So, if you expect the "if I can break what you can make" warranty, you need to talk to Snap On, and take out the wallet.
Actually, Cornwell is a unicorn, the mystical thing that supposedly exists. Kinda like seeing bigfoot.
They shouldn't make that length if they don't want the tools used. Harder to break a 12" 1/4 ratchet than you think, but yes it can be done.
Come work with me for a week and you'll understand why these tools need to exist. Going up a drive size is not an option in many cases.
You can't use a long offset box wrench because the unibody is in the way, cant swing it. Even if you could, you would need to use the ratcheting end, 12 point cant engage the next point in the swing arc you have. No power tools either, don't fit. Even with nano sockets 1/2 drive hits the coil spring. 18" long flex head 3/8 is your only option, with a low profile socket at that. And it was torqued to 90ft/lbs with a gallon of locktite at the factory, 6 years ago. This is a caliper bracket bolt.
Like that Matco special forces ratchetInteresting, I thought I was the only weirdo who liked my Matco ratchets more than my Snap-ons. Good to see.
I have the older T model ratchets but mine was before the 88s, they were 60T IIRC. My 3/8 ratchet I swapped the internals to 84T using a GW rebuild kit. I don't think I touched my 1/4, not even sure if there is higher tooth count for it. This reminds me, I've been meaning to get rebuild kits for them from Matco.
I did eventually pick up Dual 80 ratchets out of curiosity, F80, T72, & FC72. I don't use them much, I find myself reaching for my Matcos more or my old 36T Snappys (F936 & FHL936A). They just feel better to use to me. Maybe I just don't care for high tooth count much or maybe it's just habit?
BTW: in the pic below, you can see the GW selector installed. It doesn't work right in the Matco ratchet, not mine anyway. It will give you the dreaded self reversing direction problem. I put the original Matco selector back in with the GW 84T pawl & anvil.
![]()
Me too. I used the heck out of it. It was my first "real" ratchet I ever purchased when I started working at a shop. Before that I only had round head Husky USA ratchets that came in a set. I would go to Sears weekly but I never liked any of their Craftsman ratchets, they just felt cheap & sloppy to me so I never purchased a single one.Like that Matco special forces ratchet


Every thng Matço sells is rebranded, All the others make somethiñg of there own,Actually, Cornwell is a unicorn, the mystical thing that supposedly exists. Kinda like seeing bigfoot.
Matco is the brand everyone like to hate for whatever reason. I like their stuff overall.



Or made for them exclusively. I didn't know that 25 yrs ago when I was buying from Matco. I only gave my money to Matco & Snap-on during that time. Our Mac dealer was on old ***** so I never stepped foot on his truck again. Cornwell is still a myth to me, still have never seen a Cornwell truck ever around here.Every thng Matço sells is rebranded, All the others make somethiñg of there own,