Not in that one.Never saw that before.
Anything inside??
Neat finds. I do believe the Koto is made and Japan and they copied the Williams Superratchet right down to the name. The Japanese and Germans loved to copy the look of US ratchets. The breaker bar doesn’t seem to have have a Williams look.Vulcan carb tool I believe. Looks identical to the blue point one. Actually thought it was a blue point until I decided to finally give it a clean. Never seen one by them before. And then a koto breaker bar. Not sure of the relationship that I saw. Someone post a super ratchet by them a while back
Depends on which style. I'll have to check if I still have but I know I had one just like it. But also have had some that look completely different. One of the ones I had was identical the Milwaukee tool & forge. Always interesting to see the different stylesNeat finds. I do believe the Koto is made and Japan and they copied the Williams Superratchet right down to the name. The Japanese and Germans loved to copy the look of US ratchets. The breaker bar doesn’t seem to have have a Williams look.
I suspect that it was an adjustment handle on a piece of equipment. The set screw retained it on a hex. This allowed the handle to stay attached, but be relocated to keep it in the desired position, even if there was wear in the parts.
That would make the most sense.I suspect that it was an adjustment handle on a piece of equipment. The set screw retained it on a hex. This allowed the handle to stay attached, but be relocated to keep it in the desired position, even if there was wear in the parts.
.... probably because almost all of those were manufactured by Aircraft Specialties in Lapeer, Michigan - they made them for everybody.Vulcan carb tool I believe. Looks identical to the blue point one.
Not definitively. Most reasonable theory is after WWII but before 1948 based on other characteristics (the label under the lid of the box, socket construction) of sets owned by @Oldtuleguy in which the ratchet looks original to the set.Does anyone know when these <W> marked ratchets were produced?
Budget line, value line, etc, is the leading theory here among a core group of collectors on this thread here at GJ. That they don't get the full branding treatment, only the < W > logo, seems to bear that out. Also lending credence to this theory is that they are nearly identical to the Volume line, which was Williams' known budget/value line.I always thought they were a budget version made by Williams.
Nobody has as far as I am aware.I haven't been able to find a picture of them in any of my Williams catalogs.

There is an acute shortage of "old catalog" for WilliamsI haven't been able to find a picture of them in any of my Williams catalogs.
No there's not. You've said this before, and I've corrected you before. In general, Williams is one of the most comprehensively represented mfgrs on IA/ITCL, and that period in particular is jam packed with catalogs. There are twenty-one (21) catalogs between 1937 and 1964, and several other related documents (Price Lists, Supplements, Tool Facts, etc). In particular, a 1947, a 1948, and a 1949 catalog, which is when his tools were most likely made.There is an acute shortage of "old catalog" for Williams between the mid-1930s and the early 1960s.


I think they were dubbed that before becoming a catalog item. Just my theory. Seen a decent number of them marked that way but I can't remember if all had a female end. That could be the reason.
Yeah, but that was later. I talked about it upthread here...They eliminated the N eventually and the part number became M-106
Williams actually dropped the "N" (for New) from their "NM-" (for New Midget) 1/4-inch drive model number scheme sometime before 1963 (first newer catalog I found it in...), ostensibly because enough time had passed when "M-" could be used for Midget again without any concern about confusion with the earlier "M-" scheme for original 9/32-inch drive Midget tools.


A die/mold number comes to mind.I picked this beauty up yesterday while out tool scavenging. It has the oval logo and markings consistent with the period of time that Williams had plants in both Brooklyn and Buffalo. Aside from the W-in-a-diamond the only other marking is "131". The milled openings appear (without getting a micrometer) to be 5/8" x 3/4". I can't find anything similar in the catalogs from that period. Anyone know the significance of the "131"?
Bill
If it was a Vlchek or a couple other mfgrs, that would be a good possibility. Williams is not known for using them, though, especially not in that era.A die/mold number comes to mind.
A very odd one, indeed, Billiam. Not just the "131" not being a Williams model number, but no size markings on the flip side. They would typically be expressing U.S.S. sizes if they were present. A woebegotten "731" is not out of the question, but not likely, either.I can't find anything similar in the catalogs from that period.