Outlawmws
Well-known member
I'd agree predates PEXTO, branding. I have a damaged PEXTO clamp on; 2-1/2" jaws.
The Osborne version of those have standard modern threads on them, you might be able to replace that odd thing with a knurled nut, then look for a vintage one.I picked up a set of P S & W No. 8 dividers yesterday out of a machinist chest along with a couple other calipers. These have seen a lot of use but will be good for a little more
Thanks RTM. I may even have a knurled nut that would fit the wing but I doubt I change that brass bit out. It's a vintage repair by some long gone machinist and I kind of like it that way. I thought with that pie crust border around the PS&W logo they might be early. Here is a catalog cut from 1910 but the numbers are different. Ed.The Osborne version of those have standard modern threads on them, you might be able to replace that odd thing with a knurled nut, then look for a vintage one.
Your #8 is the length in inches, normally. The x35 finish is hard to tell from 100+ years ago.Here is a catalog cut from 1910 but the numbers are different
I see these, and how much they look like the Stanley (& Craftsman) ones, I wonder if Pexto made their own, or also sold to Craftsman.found this rusty Pexto wood chisel at a recent sale.
Very early logo. 1910-1915I missed that post, 3bay. Very nice.
The only reason I picked up these seemingly innocuous slip-joint pliers at the flea market this morning is the logo. I had never seen this before on a PEXTO tool. Not just the 'GUARANTEED' part, but that fist! Armstrong used an entire arm of course, a strong one, holding a hammer. In a funny way this looks more, I have to say, with no intent of making a contemporary political statement, like a classic power/unity/solidarity salute, used by many groups (French revolution, Bolsheviks, Wobblies, etc) over time.
Yep. If you continue reading from there I eventually post an excerpt of it in a 1911 trade mag.Very early logo. 1910-1915







Welcome, Hernan. Your backstory and legacy are terrific.My name is Hernán, and I'm 54 years old. I live in Argentina. Some time ago, I started cleaning and restoring my father's tools...
I wouldn't say it's impossible for that clamp to have come off the line like that from the factory, but I'd be surprised, and I do suspect abuse. If someone was using the clamp to bend or straighten a work piece by striking the clamp instead of the workpiece, it's possible. None of the specimens I have in my collection come even close to being what I would call wavy, like yours, but almost none of them are perfectly straight and a few do shows signs of being struck on the spine. These are antique, ornate, wonderful clamps, but they are not heavy duty. Except for the screw, they were made from malleable iron, and known for being found fairly beat up and in need of straightening in a vise. Maybe @LesserSon and @leg17, who have larger collections than mine (see post #68 on page 2 and post #213 on page 6), will see your post and also comment. Their posts and ensuing discussions or searching the thread on "Steel Screw" will reveal more information on the history as well as some catalog excerpts.Is it possible to deform a clamp of this size, with that type of deformation, and in that way, with a hammer? I understand that this isn't what happened, but rather that the clamp came like this from the factory, from the foundry. I have no other explanation for this deformation.
No apologies necessary. There are a few TL;DR types here, but a core group of collectors who admire as much detail as possible.apologizing in advance if I went on too long,...[ ]...I find everything detailed in this thread and in "The Garage Journal" very interesting,
The dates on the frame and the wingnut refer to the three Whitney patents: design patent D18,376 (Jun 5, 1888) for the frame, utility patent 385,983 (Jul 10, 1888) for the frame, and utility patent 388,007 (Aug 14, 1888) for the screw.These markings are noticeable (perhaps not visible in the photo): 1) "PAT. AUG" (on one side of the adjusting handle) and "11th 1888" (on the other side of the adjusting handle); 2) "PAT. JUN 15, JUL 10 ??" (The question marks are there because I think I see two numbers, but I can't identify them precisely... this inscription is on the side where the company name is and above that name). The first date coincides with the data on page 340 of the Annual Report of the Commissioner of Patents for the year 1888. It states that Pardon A. Whitney, of Southington, Connecticut, registered a CLAMP design on July 10th, patent number 385,983. On August 11th, he registered a CLAMP SCREW, patent number 388,007.
Hello… Thank you so much for your response and your kindness. I really didn't know what those dates meant there. Thank you for the precise information. My father acquired this and other antique tools quite some time ago (many of them are woodworking tools) for very little money… As I've been restoring all of my father's tools, I've realized the ENORMOUS quantity and variety of tools he has. I look at different online sales platforms for various antique tools. In Argentina, unfortunately, there are VERY few antique tools available. And most of those few tools are VERY deteriorated and VERY expensive (vintage has become fashionable, and some people think that a rusty, dysfunctional, and mistreated tool is worth as much as any new (or used) tool in good condition. And when I say mistreated, I don't mean rust, but rather the CARELESSNESS (not to be confused with intensive use) in the use and care of the tool... Sometimes, some tools seem to have "returned" from a fratricidal war... And on top of that, they are SO overpriced that you don't know if the seller WANTS to sell them or not. But, well... For now, I'm content with restoring what I still need (almost nothing) to finish organizing and cleaning what's in my father's workshop. For now, I thank you again for your kindness, and I hope to upload some photos (in the corresponding thread) of some "Unbranded" tools that my father has. Greetings from Argentina, Private LugnutzWelcome, Hernan. Your backstory and legacy are terrific.
I wouldn't say it's impossible for that clamp to have come off the line like that from the factory, but I'd be surprised, and I do suspect abuse. If someone was using the clamp to bend or straighten a work piece by striking the clamp instead of the workpiece, it's possible. None of the specimens I have in my collection come even close to being what I would call wavy, like yours, but almost none of them are perfectly straight and a few do shows signs of being struck on the spine. These are antique, ornate, wonderful clamps, but they are not heavy duty. They were made from malleable steel and known for being found fairly beat up and in need of straightening in a vise. Maybe @LesserSon and @leg17, who have larger collections than mine (see post #68 on page 2 and post #213 on page 6), will see your post and also comment. Their posts and ensuing discussions or searching the thread on "Steel Screw" will reveal more information on the history as well as some catalog excerpts.
No apologies necessary. There are a few TL;DR types here, but a core group of collectors who admire as much detail as possible.
The dates on the frame and the wingnut refer to the three Whitney patents: design patent D18,376 (Jun 5, 1888) for the frame, utility patent 385,983 (Jul 10, 1888) for the frame, and utility patent 388,007 (Aug 14, 1888) for the screw.
You're quite welcome. I appreciate you taking the time to find the correct thread dedicated to the subject! All newcomers who have the respect and mindset to do that are off to the right start.Thank you so much for your response
When you're ready to post photos, I encourage you to consult the A-Z Index of Threads in the Sticky (permanent thread) at the top of this Vintage Tools Discussion forum to locate the appropriate thread. As you've probably discovered, the forum decays chronologically, with only the latest threads with activity showing on page 1, then page 2, and so on, in descending order. To find inactive threads that you cannot see other than paging through hundreds of older, inactive, archived threads, simply peruse the links in the A-Z Index of Threads, organized by type (e.g., Hand saws, Hammers, etc) or brand (e.g., Peck, Stow, and Wilcox, Goodell-Pratt, etc).As I've been restoring all of my father's tools, I've realized the ENORMOUS quantity and variety of tools he has...[ ]...I'm content with restoring what I still need (almost nothing) to finish organizing and cleaning...[ ]...I hope to upload some photos (in the corresponding thread) of some "Unbranded" tools that my father has.
You can find a bunch of catalogs here, help you pin down the date a bit moreIt's a P.S. & W. Co. Southington, Conn. U.S.A. - Steel No. 6 Screw.
I seem to recall from an earlier discussion that the only catalog on IA/ITCL in which the "Star" brand carriage makers' clamps appear is the No. 10 (1910). The known documented design and production timeline for these is essentially 1885 (Shaw patent with rotatable anvil) through 1888 (trio of Whitney patents) through 1910 (aforementioned No. 10 catalog) and gone by 1920 (No. 20 catalog). I never did try to narrow it down with trade mags, etc, in between.You can find a bunch of catalogs here, help you pin down the date a bit more
Hello, four.cycle. Thank you in advance for the welcome. I'll answer VERY briefly, because I'll leave a more elaborate and well-argued response for later.Hola Hernán and welcome to the site!
Lovely example of P.S.& W.'s "artful" clamp design, notwithstanding the hammer marks.
You are going to want to keep these URLs handy:
International Tool Catalog Library is your friend.
The "INDEX" referred to above is HERE
This LIST may be of some help to you - unfortunately it includes only TWO entries for "Agentina" - hopefully you will be able to provide us with names of other Argentine tool manufacturers (or ANY tool manufacturers south of the Rio Grande, for that matter.)
Look forward to seeing more!![]()
WONDERFUL! I'm truly SO grateful that you shared that link with me. I had NO IDEA that so many catalogs existed, and all compiled into one list. THANKS again!International Tool Catalog Library is your friend.
OK. I'm sorry... I didn't know. I apologize, of course. I didn't intend for it to be interpreted as spreading a political idea, although, of course, that's exactly what it was, inevitably. That said, it won't happen again. Thanks for letting me know. For now, although I assume your comment will be recorded, I'm going to modify it (my comment, of course). Not to avoid warnings or sanctions (which, if applicable, I must accept, of course). I'm doing it so as not to upset anyone and not to distract from the thread or the essence of this site.YIKES!
errrr.... the site administrator is quite unforgiving when it comes to ANYTHING "politics".
four things we never discuss here: politics, religion, abortion, or arguing about guns. (arguing about anything, actually.)
Hopefully they'll allow some grace since you're new.
Ah... Gardel... I LOVE Gardel. Do you know what we call Gardel here in Argentina? El mudo... There's no English translation for that ironic and affectionate nickname. Strictly speaking, the nickname would be "The Deaf-Mute," as if he truly couldn't speak. Those were different times, and nicknames often seem outdated today. But I think the idea behind that nickname is irony. Like if you gave Usain Bolt a nickname and said... "The Slow One" or "The Tortoise."That said, thanks for the history lesson. I had absolutely NO idea and I'm a bit puzzled. Argentina (at least Buenos Aires) was a mecca for the well-heeled a century ago.
And if it were not for Argentina, we would never have had a Carlos Gardel![]()