To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Spreading the Bonney affliction!

Steven 33

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2022
Messages
665
Wow! Great find. I agree, the smallest wrenches are often the hardest to find. I’m not sure whether I just overlook them, or whether they are actually scarce.
I’ve been slowly building two sets of the early E4x DBEs to display both sides.
IMG_8435.jpeg
My two sets have no E40s (just a single later-era placeholder) and only one E44 (w another later-era placeholder). Similar issue with Zenel E18 and E20 DOEs.
I have some somewhere.I'll see if I can dig them up
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Mikeske

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
2,131
Location
Washington State
I have a partial set of the older, pre-Loc-Rite flare wrenches. Nice feel, solid tools, only used them a few times but they worked nice.
Oh yeah and I have a few of the pre-Loc-Tite and a lot of the Loc-Tite flare wrenches. The open-box on the right were from a military set I got off eBay several years ago and the ones in metric and SAE in the red vinyl roll ups were from my original set of Bonney I bought in 1984.IMG_0022.jpeg
 

Raineman

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2021
Messages
865
Location
central Maryland
If anyone wants these, I can send them to you. Maybe help with postage. They don’t fit in with my preferred Bonney collection and I’m purging a lot of my collection of other brands as well.

Free to anyone that wants this batch. If you feel inclined to help me with shipping cost, okay.

IMG_8599.jpeg
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,605
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Picked up another suspected postwar stud puller. This one does not show any signs of having any number resembling a Snap-on date code, unlike the first one I found, which looks like a Snap-on, and had an "8" resembling a Snap-on 1948 date code, in a location where other Snap-on and other identical stud pullers with other brands (e.g., Hastings) had date code numbers. Loooong and as I recall inconclusive discussion back in 2019 if anywhere cares to re-visit.

Cleaned up well.
 

Attachments

  • 20260529_100241.jpg
    20260529_100241.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 7
  • 20260529_100318.jpg
    20260529_100318.jpg
    594.7 KB · Views: 8

LesserSon

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
5,075
Location
PA USA
So what do you get when you buy two NOS Bonney No199 utility knives? These are identical to the Stanley No199 utility knives, with the exception of the raised-letters company name that's on them. Like the screwdrivers and hammers (at least the Stanloid-tipped ones, which have red paint instead of orange paint), likely made by Stanley. Bonney made forged products, and there isn't anything forged about these. It would be fascinating to find correspondence specifying the products and financial arrangement that created them, and whether Bonney made any components or complete products for Stanley.
IMG_0670.jpegI added a fourth and fifth No199 utility knife to my collection recently, and didn’t expect any surprises, but I got one when I opened them up to remove the dull and rusted blades. Inside, one had a single Stanley No1992 and several General No852, the other had several Millers Falls No3325.
IMG_0671.jpeg The one with the MF blades was more heavily-constructed than the one with the General blades!
IMG_0673.jpeg
This led me to open up the NOS examples, which were stocked with unmarked blades, sharing the size and angle of the MF and General blades, but with two notches (like the Stanley, but not sharing the length or more acute angle of it) instead of three. Hmmm. I had hoped to use the blades to establish whether the heavy knife was older or newer, but the blades may not help. Neither NOS examples, nor another earlier acuisition shared the heavy construction.
I’m favoring the “heavy is older” theory for now, but will have to see if Stanley utility knives show a similar internal redesign.
 
Last edited:

LesserSon

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
5,075
Location
PA USA
IMG_0670.jpegI added a fourth and fifth No199 utility knife to my collection recently, and didn’t expect any surprises, but I got one when I opened them up to remove the dull and rusted blades. Inside, one had a single Stanley No1992 and several General No852, the other had several Millers Falls No3325.
IMG_0671.jpeg The one with the MF blades was more heavily-constructed than the one with the General blades!
IMG_0673.jpeg
This led me to open up the NOS examples, which were stocked with unmarked blades, sharing the size and angle of the MF and General blades, but with two notches (like the Stanley, but not sharing the length or more acute angle of it) instead of three. Hmmm. I had hoped to use the blades to establish whether the heavy knife was older or newer, but the blades may not help. Neither NOS examples, nor another earlier acuisition shared the heavy construction.
I’m favoring the “heavy is older” theory for now, but will have to see if Stanley utility knives show a similar internal redesign.
IMG_0686.jpegView attachment 2550551
Another surprise when I opened up two Stanley No199 utility knives.
Neither is identical to either type of Bonney, though they all share some characteristics.
From comparing elements, I say the order of development is
IMG_0671.jpeg
IMG_0685.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0671.jpeg
    IMG_0671.jpeg
    461.8 KB · Views: 15
Last edited:

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,605
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
^ Interesting deep dive, LS. I did a "Curator's Corner" on Utility Knives linked HERE, and a few updates after that, which you can find in the Lugzsonian thread index in post #1, but while I included a Bonney and Stanley and noted the identical production, and took a quick stab at the No. 199 history, I did not do a close comparison.
 

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,605
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
I was elated to pluck this Bonney Champion No. 112 (1-1/2" jaws) out of a wooden drawer this morning at the flea. I couldn't reach it leaning from the front of the table and tried to not dance too excitedly around the corner with anticipation as soon as I spotted it. It has a gorgeous 'Princeton' logo.
 

Attachments

  • 20260605_140849.jpg
    20260605_140849.jpg
    1,008.4 KB · Views: 15
  • 20260605_141006.jpg
    20260605_141006.jpg
    748 KB · Views: 16
  • 20260605_141023.jpg
    20260605_141023.jpg
    517.3 KB · Views: 16
  • 20260605_140952.jpg
    20260605_140952.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 17

Private Lugnutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
30,605
Location
The Authentic Jersey Shore
Photos of the markings, including a very oddly placed "U.S.A.", obviously stamped when the jaws were closed. It could just be my brain doing some instinctive wishful thinking, but a very reasonable expansion of the "O.D." stamped just above it, and quite probably at the same time, if not the very same stamp, is Ordnance Department! :pimpflash
 

Attachments

  • 20260605_140907.jpg
    20260605_140907.jpg
    471.7 KB · Views: 17
  • 20260605_140925.jpg
    20260605_140925.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 16
  • 20260605_140821.jpg
    20260605_140821.jpg
    450.3 KB · Views: 19
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Shelbylex

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
3,126
Location
MA
Good afternoon.
Sorry for being lazy, does anybody remember where the black and white picture of Bonney tool boxes within the garage was posted? Most likely this thread...


Answering my own question: posted by MRITCHIE77, post 5252
 

Steven 33

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2022
Messages
665
Bonney and a couple others for good measure
 

Attachments

  • 20260620_014131.jpg
    20260620_014131.jpg
    810.8 KB · Views: 10
  • 20260620_014100.jpg
    20260620_014100.jpg
    814.9 KB · Views: 10

LesserSon

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
5,075
Location
PA USA
Wow! Great find. I agree, the smallest wrenches are often the hardest to find. I’m not sure whether I just overlook them, or whether they are actually scarce.
I’ve been slowly building two sets of the early E4x DBEs to display both sides.
IMG_8435.jpeg
My two sets have no E40s (just a single later-era placeholder) and only one E44 (w another later-era placeholder). Similar issue with Zenel E18 and E20 DOEs.
IMG_0878.jpegIMG_0877.jpegeBay provided a No21 set of E- 40, 42, 44, 46, and I was quick to break it up and put the E40 and E44 under glass today. Still subbing one latter-day E40.
IMG_0879.jpeg
 

Steven 33

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2022
Messages
665
702K Trifecta! I found the little V-702K 1/4"er yesterday. The T and hinge handles were recent finds too. T-30 and T-36. I am happy the three ratchets mats as well as they do. There can be a lot of variation in the chrome plating process.

IMG_1359.jpegIMG_1360.jpeg
Now just need the flex heads!
 

Attachments

  • 20260626_194822.jpg
    20260626_194822.jpg
    265.2 KB · Views: 13

Mintgrun

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,133
Location
Kingston, Wa.
I had assumed this CHAMPION PLUG-MASTER CT-405 ratchet was made by BLACKHAWK, but after seeing the BONNEY examples above, I'm leaning towards it fitting into this thread. Both ratchets give sixty clicks per revolution, but the clicker is smoother and quieter in the CHAMPION.

IMG_1820.jpegIMG_1824.jpeg IMG_1823.jpeg
 

RTM

Well-known member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
13,191
Location
SF Bay Area
had assumed this CHAMPION PLUG-MASTER CT-405 ratchet was made by BLACKHAWK, but after seeing the BONNEY examples above, I'm leaning towards it fitting into this thread. Both ratchets give sixty clicks per revolution, but the clicker is smoother and quieter in the CHAMPION.
Mine are in the Champion thread, where someone else said NB made, might change your mind.

 

Mintgrun

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,133
Location
Kingston, Wa.
Your March example resembles my Blackhawk and the December one looks like my Champion.

I can't keep track of who made what - for who - when... but do appreciate the input.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RTM
OP
B

bonneyman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
8,812
Location
Desert SW
Now just need the flex heads!
It's too bad Bonney didn't make the 1/4" in a flex head. With the way the industry went they probably would have sold a million of 'em.

At one point I considered mating a 1/4" flex handle with the head of a 1/4" ratchet. But decided against it as I'd have to sacrifice one of my V702-k's for the project.
 

Beerhippie

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 13, 2023
Messages
9,848
Location
Far NE Oregon
Ahh only one. How about two. I had these from several years ago when I found both on e-bay and of course I had to get separately get them. The chrome one is a replacement for my broken flex head I had when I originally bought my entire Bonney set from Grainger in 1984. IMG_0099.jpegIMG_0098.jpegIMG_0097.jpeg
I have the socket set to go with your faux-gold-plated Chrysler Award wrench--in Metric.
 

Mikeske

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
2,131
Location
Washington State
I have the socket set to go with your faux-gold-plated Chrysler Award wrench--in Metric.
I have a swivel socket set in faux-gold that I got and never used. I never looked that hard back 5-6 years ago when I was rebuilding my set of Bonney tools. If a faux-gold set shows up and it is fairly priced on eBay I might consider grabbing it but also have not looked that hard once I got to a completion of what I originally had as those tools are now only used when I work on my equipment and pickup truck.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom