HarleyArley
Well-known member
Im quite familiar with the doctrine. It also covers public places where eminent harm may occur to innocent public bystanders. If she had brandished a weapon, even only showing it present in a waistband, he would be well within his legal rights to draw a firearm (if he had one) and detain her until police arrive. This type of case has been well covered in the supreme court, especially in Ohio.
One case in particular involved an elderly gentleman (Joe Horn) that came across two illegal immigrants robbing his neighbors home. One brandished a firearm, the old man asked him to drop the weapon, and when he took a step toward him, the old man shot him dead. When his partner in crime made a dash, the old timer shot him dead as well. Mr. Horn was later exhonorated of any wrongdoing.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Horn_shooting_controversy
I would repeat my earlier advise that you do some more research into Ohio's castle doctine law.
You are correct that you would be completely OK with the law to disarm and detain someone brandishing a firearm in public, but that did not occur in this case and Ohio's castle doctrine law has nothing to do with it. The CD law eliminates your duty to retreat while in your home or car. Nothing else. You still must fear for your life and have done nothing to create or escalate the situation prior to use of deadly force.
As for the Joe Horn case, that was in Texas, where the use of deadly force to protect property is legal. Ohio's laws have no such provision. The Horn case has nothing to do with the situation we are discussing or Ohio's castle doctrine law.
when I have some cash saved up im going to take the proper classes and buy a CCW, I think im prepared to have one now. 