lennoxlennox
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,026
I see there are 40" 3/4" breaker bars, however the longest 1/2" one I've seen is a 30"... anyone know of or have used a longer one?
i has longest 30" 1/2 drive breaker bar from matco tool (hard line tool not re-badge). Also i own a longest 15" 3/8 drive breaker bar from matco tool as it is USA made and comfort handle which i like it...
Who sells a 30" 1/2" drive?
i has longest 30" 1/2 drive breaker bar from matco tool (hard line tool not re-badge). Also i own a longest 15" 3/8 drive breaker bar from matco tool as it is USA made and comfort handle which i like it...
i remember when you got this. is it holding up well, do you like it?
It may be worth investing in a 3/4" drive if you use it enough. I didn't think I needed one until I tried one. Most 1/2" drives flex too much which takes away torque when under ultra heavy loads. The larger diameter and stiffer 3/4" handles alone is a huge gain.

I've been sooo close to pulling the trigger on that Matco, good to hear it;s holding up. Biggest thing is holding out for the comfort grip, my Matco guy has not gotten one in yet with the grip...otherwise...![]()
Unless the bar is much thicker than most, anything over 24" is a waste. My 24" SO breaker bar is great, but when you start to really pull on it, the bar will just bend, which means that if it were longer, it would just bend more and not actually apply any more force.
This makes zero sense and is completely false. The only way you would cease to continually apply more torque to the fastener as you pulled harder is if the breaker bar was yielding (bending, but not going back to its original shape).
Sum of the forces, sum of the moments. Words to live by.
You don't seem to understand. Think of it this way. Cheap ****** pliers vs good ones. The good ones are very thick and strong so that 100% of the force you apply to the grips, gets applied to the object you're grabbing. ****** HF ones bend and flex so that less power ultimately makes it to the object. Technically, yes until the bar breaks you are going to continually apply more and more force, but you're ignoring the diminishing returns. There is a point where the extra bending is sapping so much power it's not worth it. With that same amount of power, if the bar did not bend so much, it would apply much more to the fastener. If the bar was simply longer and the same width, it would just take less force for you to bend it just as much, rather than actually applying more force to the fastener.
Unless you're super old and/or weak, once you get to 24" for a standard width 1/2" prybar, the flexing of the bar is what's holding you back, not the length. If my same 24" prybar was much thicker, I could apply much more force with the same length.
Is the bar still springy/lively,that is when it bends,does it go back all of the way straight when you relax the force on it?Unless the bar is much thicker than most, anything over 24" is a waste. My 24" SO breaker bar is great, but when you start to really pull on it, the bar will just bend, which means that if it were longer, it would just bend more and not actually apply any more force. The most important thing is finding a breaker that is very thick and won't bend when you apply a lot of force to it.
It may be worth investing in a 3/4" drive if you use it enough. I didn't think I needed one until I tried one. Most 1/2" drives flex too much which takes away torque when under ultra heavy loads. The larger diameter and stiffer 3/4" handles alone is a huge gain.
You don't seem to understand. Think of it this way. Cheap ****** pliers vs good ones. The good ones are very thick and strong so that 100% of the force you apply to the grips, gets applied to the object you're grabbing. ****** HF ones bend and flex so that less power ultimately makes it to the object. Technically, yes until the bar breaks you are going to continually apply more and more force, but you're ignoring the diminishing returns. There is a point where the extra bending is sapping so much power it's not worth it. With that same amount of power, if the bar did not bend so much, it would apply much more to the fastener. If the bar was simply longer and the same width, it would just take less force for you to bend it just as much, rather than actually applying more force to the fastener.
Unless you're super old and/or weak, once you get to 24" for a standard width 1/2" prybar, the flexing of the bar is what's holding you back, not the length. If my same 24" prybar was much thicker, I could apply much more force with the same length.
I promise I am correct, you are confusing a couple of different principals. Here is why your logic does not hold:
1)Every time you apply ANY force on that breaker bar, it MUST bend. You might not realize it, but every amount of load on the grip, from .001lbf of pull to, say, 50lbf of pull, that bar is bending. You just don't realize it because it is so insignificant at lower loads.
2)YES the applied moment is diminishing slightly as the bar bends because the moment arm changes by a very small amount but that doesn't really matter for our discussion. Regardless, the not/bolt needs to react the moment (applied force X breaker bar "length") no matter what. As I said before, the only way this would not be the case is if you pulled hard enough to permanently bend the bar.
3)You are trying to argue that the bar bending is "sapping power" and it doesn't work like that. There IS strain energy put into the bar through the bending, but all that bending bar is doing is storing that energy. Think of it as a spring.
With your logic, a coil spring would not work at all. Once you "noticed" that there is deformation in the spring, more force on the spring would cause the spring to just continue to compress until it bottomed out. We know from cars, however, that this does not happen. Obviously you can over power a spring, but the forces MUST balance out.
I am curious why people like breaker bars compared to ratchets? All my breaker bars collect dust save for my 3/8" one that I use to remove injection lines.

Ever try to remove lug nuts with a 1/2 inch ratchet?![]()
Ever try to remove lug nuts with a 1/2 inch ratchet?![]()
Ever try to remove lug nuts with a 1/2 inch ratchet?![]()
Sure have,with my Matco CFR24LFT..
I've got a Gearwrench 24" breaker bar,about $36 I think from Advance Auto.I don't use it much since I have that monster Matco ratchet.If I needed any more leverage,I would get a long 3/4 drive bar and a 3/4-1/2 adapter.
Yep, 16" proto gets them every time.![]()

Ever try to remove lug nuts with a 1/2 inch ratchet?![]()
Thats my point though, my ratchet is as long as my breaker bar and does everything I need it to.
I promise I am correct, you are confusing a couple of different principals. Here is why your logic does not hold:
1)Every time you apply ANY force on that breaker bar, it MUST bend. You might not realize it, but every amount of load on the grip, from .001lbf of pull to, say, 50lbf of pull, that bar is bending. You just don't realize it because it is so insignificant at lower loads.
2)YES the applied moment is diminishing slightly as the bar bends because the moment arm changes by a very small amount but that doesn't really matter for our discussion. Regardless, the not/bolt needs to react the moment (applied force X breaker bar "length") no matter what. As I said before, the only way this would not be the case is if you pulled hard enough to permanently bend the bar.
3)You are trying to argue that the bar bending is "sapping power" and it doesn't work like that. There IS strain energy put into the bar through the bending, but all that bending bar is doing is storing that energy. Think of it as a spring.
With your logic, a coil spring would not work at all. Once you "noticed" that there is deformation in the spring, more force on the spring would cause the spring to just continue to compress until it bottomed out. We know from cars, however, that this does not happen. Obviously you can over power a spring, but the forces MUST balance out.
So according to your theory, using long extensions with an impact gun will have no affect whatsoever on how much power actually reaches the socket correct? After all, they are just "springs".![]()
