McBrownie
Well-known member
And its pretty small compared to the HF 5" vise:
View media item 52964
View media item 52966
Sorry, I couldn't resist.

And its pretty small compared to the HF 5" vise:

Hemi,
Boy this thread moves fast. I have a Prentiss 19 with the same lead filled holes. The best guess around here is that those holes were used to mount the swivel jaw in a jig for machining. Then they were filled up when the machining was done.
Cheers chaps.I was half expecting a look of condemnation over that finish.
No tea was involved CW.
The finish is merely plain old shoe polish. More specifically, two coats of dark tan followed by a coat of black and finished with a coat of neutral. Each coat was given around half hour to one hour to harden, and then buffed with a brush and cloth. All bright & machined surfaces were given a coat of neutral.
Been meaning to try this method of finishing for a good while now, to see whether it would work or not, and this BB seemed the prime candidate. Neither burgundy nor linseed oil took my fancy for this one, (they just didn't seem appropriate in my minds eye, somehow), so decided to try for an aged look, (hence the various colours used), with the polish.
I'm in the land of eternal damp.It should hopefully be quite well protected against rust with the wax though.
The whole swivel & tilt thing being incorporated within the vice itself is nice on these. 4" jaws too. It's getting hold of these which is the surprisingly awkward part though. It's taken me around three or four years to get a hold of one. For a small vice, they do seem to be very few and far between. I let one slip a couple of years ago, and I've kicked myself many a time for doing so. I'm chuffed as punch that I've finally managed to get a hold of one. If Fraggles hadn't given me a heads up,I'd have never even seen this one.
What problem are you having when you try electrolysis? Sounds like you've been extremely unlucky with it upto just.
It is in pretty decent nick. There are nicks and dents, but fortunately the paint wasn't hiding a multitude of sins. The rust seems to have come of awfully well too. I had expected a bit more surface pitting when it was derusted. It seems to have been slightly thicker than just a surface layer, but the metal underneath seems surprisingly untouched in relation to the rust thickness.
The thread appears to be standard 3/16" BSW, but the head is a thin taper. Can't recall the angle offhand. I do have one countersink with the same angle as far as I can tell, so I'll check the angle later.The heads were completely destroyed in removing the screws, unfortunately.
Here's another Diamond vise someone sold recently on eBay. I noticed that his has the original spindle handle. Ours does not. My Brother said he remembered our vise having one, but there's no telling why it's missing. Dad stuck an old military antenna guy stake through the spindle head to use as a handle and that's all I ever remember it having.
If you look at the bottom picture, you can see the flat spring under the static jaw. This is the part I'll need.
Btw, does anyone know how the vise spindle handles were constructed? I don't know if the knob on one end was swaged on and the other threaded, or both were threaded or what. I'd love to find a proper handle for my vise eventually.

TIMBITCA: Just the man I wanted to speak to. Thanks to you I now own a second pipe vise and I didn't even have a use for the first one. I was rooting around an old shed at a garage sale and I came across a rusty pipe vise which I promptly ignored. When I couldn't find a proper bench vise I came back to have a closer look at the pipe vise. Lo-and-behold it's an RAE. Until you posted those pictures of your beauty I didn't know that name. Now I have two pipe vises. This one only set me back $2 US though. I just took some BEFORE pix that I'll show along with the AFTER pix whenever that is.
Tim: that Blacksmith vise is one of the few i'd like to own. it has great lines and it's built stout. depending on how heavy or how wide the jaws are would determine the price i or you might want to pay. it does look like a keeper though.
the double swiveler looks like a cheap import and missing parts. some of those are built a lot better and like I've said I have yet to meet an owner that didn't like using theirs.
Alright my bunch of Vise experts, who can identify this?
![]()
Shoe polish? I would never have guessed correctly. You might have posted it but do you have a before picture?
Spent a bit of time on this vise.
[...]
And some old school flames.
I wouldn't mind betting that picture was taken with a mobile phone, that's some pretty impressive lens distortion ..... or perhaps a tapered bench as well![]()
Here is my Wilton vise made in August 1946.
Just picked it up for free at a garage sale.
The jaws measure 4 1/2" across. What number vise is this? Are replacement jaws available?
It has been used, but it locks up tight, very tight. No noticeable slop. The grease on the threads sure does stink!
I posted last summer about a Craftsman vise... it is the larger 4" #5169... A couple of notes on design and assembly...
12/1/67. Would you like a pic?Do you have a picture of the slide or know exactly what the date is? I would like it for the Wilton date database. Nice job!
12/1/67. Would you like a pic?
Is that a Record? Quite like the flames.Unorthodox, but they appeal.
![]()
Thanks Kevin!
Just stunning. If I ever wear out the current jaws on my Paramo, I know exactly what I want to replace them with...
YesIs it in this format 12 1 67?