To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Milwaukee 2763 vs 2764..?

tam

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
44
Location
East Bay, California
The 2763 is a 1/2" drive and the 2764 is 3/4" drive. Any reason not to get the 2764 over the 2763? Looks like the 2764 comes with a 1/2 adapter as well.

Here are the "power" ratings...
4bQvpTu.png


I figure anywhere the 1/2" drive won't fit the 3/4" drive won't fit either. I've been searching for a picture of both models side by side, but haven't found one yet. My uses would be mainly automotive.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

trackwelder

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
2,608
Location
n.y
On the 1/2" model mode 1 is 100 foot pounds. Nice for tighten lug nuts up before the torque wrench.
 

woodstockva

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
894
Location
USA
Get the 2763....unless all you work on is heavy equipment or tractor trailers. By using the 3/4" to 1/2" adapter, you will not only make the tool longer....you WILL lose at least 100 ft-lbs of torque.

Check out my videos on it....


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/6qn2r0nSVW4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/5O7UMRva9Lc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

SpannerMonkey

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
306
Location
Scotland, UK
I got the 3/4" as I found it cheaper. I got my self a set of 3/4" impact sockets so no loss of torque for me. 3/4" extensions weigh a ton though! Thankfully, I have the M18 Fuel 3/8" compact impact wrench as well.
 

woodstockva

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
894
Location
USA
woodstockva - In that second video, you mention the caveat "as long as you use the correct size fastener" multiple times. What exactly do you mean by that?

Well, I specifically asked Milwaukee "how did you achieve the 100 ft-lbs rating that you are claiming", and they talked to the engineers that made that particular tool & found that it was when they tested it with a 5/8" coarse thread grade 8 bolt.....which is the exact bolt I used in my video.

The problem was (prior to me making this video), that no one thought it would make more than 40 ft-lbs or so of torque. Even when people called the customer service hotline, the reps supposedly said it wouldnt make that much. I figured since they claimed it, then they must have done some testing to back it up in case they got sued.

If someone is using it in mode one to tighten smaller lug nuts (for example), it will not tigheten them to 100 ft-lbs. That would be the ideal use when you see that rating advertised in my opinion. However, if they bumped this up & people just hammered on it until it stopped....most likely you would end up with stripped studs & ruined lugnuts. So, they had to make the choice to prevent accidental damage & I think it was a smart move.

So, to answer your question....the reason I said "if you use the correct sized fastener", is that this test cannot be replicated unless you are using the same bolt & thread pitch that I used.

For the record, it would NOT remove the bolt torqued to 105 ft-lbs.....so they are dead on with their claims. I find that Milwaukee either meets or exceeds ALL torque claims with their products, where other manufacturers sometimes have a fairly creative imagination when it comes to the abilities of their tools.
 
Last edited:

DarkMeans

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
1
Thanks for the reviews, woodstockva, they are great. I ended up getting the 3/4" cheaper as well so went that route, and will use a 3/4" to 1/2" adapter for a lot of my work.

Why do you say that it will lose at least 100ft.-lbs. or torque though? Based on the centers being the same, you should have the same torque, the surface area shouldn't matter on the inside of the socket except for being able to take that much torque.
 

woodstockva

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
894
Location
USA
Thanks for the reviews, woodstockva, they are great. I ended up getting the 3/4" cheaper as well so went that route, and will use a 3/4" to 1/2" adapter for a lot of my work.

Why do you say that it will lose at least 100ft.-lbs. or torque though? Based on the centers being the same, you should have the same torque, the surface area shouldn't matter on the inside of the socket except for being able to take that much torque.

Thanks! :thumbup:

Anytime you use adapters or extensions with impacts (pneumatic or cordless), you lose torque. This is due to the way impacts work....as the anvil spins it "hits" the socket creating the impact......if you add in something in between (in your case an adapter), then the anvil will spin & hit the adapter & the adapter will then move and hit the socket. The force is lessened, because not all the energy will transfer into the the socket from the initial impact blow.

The best example I can think to show you would be bowling pins. If the bowling ball hits you, it would break your foot.....if it hits a pin & the pin hits you, it would bruise you.

If you are using hand tools, and there is no impacts involved, the torque it not lost --- it is transferred.

Here is a video showing how an impact works ---

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/f0gSJa3L_7c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Tree Cutter

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
86
Location
N.J.
Does anyone know how the 2763 1/2 would fare at taking lug nuts off a truck with 20 inch tires, Ford F750?
 

signcrafter

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
12,409
Does anyone know how the 2763 1/2 would fare at taking lug nuts off a truck with 20 inch tires, Ford F750?

It should handle them just fine. What are they torqued to? I have the 2763 and it zips all lug nuts I've tried off and zipped out a honda crank bolt. I wouldn't think a F750's lugs would take more then 1100 ft/lbs of torque to come off.
 

BLUE72CAMARO

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
911
Location
IL
I just used my 2763 for the first time rebuilding the front end on my buddies truck and that thing is crazy powerful.
 

Ign

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
12,769
Location
Butte Peak ND
2763 w a boot, 2764 without. I'd say overall size is identical
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    134.8 KB · Views: 27

rustbucket5

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
252
i have a 2763 and that thing is beastly, its zipped off everything but one 24mm bolt that was siezed on an f550 rear caliper which surprised me to say the least.
 

MattPersman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
1,656
Location
Indiana
I do 4500-5500 rams with the big 10 lug wheels no problem there. It hasn't taken every bolt off we have ever tried but it's very good..once in a while you gotta pull out the breaker bar or air impact.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom