It's not what they can afford, it's what's available to them.
chinese made Craftsman are priced the same as the USA versions they replaced. The retailer reaps the savings, not the customer.
Add to this the number of tool illiterate people who don't know the difference..
The HF stuff is hung on magic pegboards with prices that lead them to think other tool retailers such as Sears are crooks... The Sears stuff is sold based upon it's former reputation from the old days.. On the day of the Big Tool Race; The HF, Craftsman, and other dime store tools brands can choose their best horse... When the countdown gets to 4-3-2-1-Go , I hope the merry-go-round is in working order.May the best "Tool" win.
I have a friend that buys only snap on tools. He uses them around the house for his lawn mower and maybe oil changes or brake pads. I on the other hand have 2 screw drivers that I found that are snap on the rest is a mix of craftsman and harbor freight. I laugh when he calls me up to use my lift in my shop to work on his truck. My usual response is "what they don't make snap on lifts yet?" He usually says I wish I could afford a lift........
There is a two word term for people who spend money like that, that would be deemed politically incorrect, to use here (or anywhere, any more, for that matter.).![]()
![]()
While I am with you on the using what you want concept the opposite is true in regards to the financial side. they will get about 1/3 for the snaps and the HF regularly sees its price in sales and auctions. Second,,, they have been lasting that long and if they were to go in the trash after being depreciated over a year or 2 its pretty much irrelevant. Its simply not the same tossing a 1$ wrench one bought recent as a 30$ one in yesterdays dollars..When I'm gone after using my tools for 30+ years, my boys will get most of what I paid for them if they decide not to keep them. HF tools would go in the garbage if they somehow managed to last that long. But I don't judge people based on the kind of tools they buy either way.
So now it's clear, you're just a hater. I have mostly Snap On tools, does that make me fit your two word description as well?
When I'm gone after using my tools for 30+ years, my boys will get most of what I paid for them if they decide not to keep them. HF tools would go in the garbage if they somehow managed to last that long. But I don't judge people based on the kind of tools they buy either way.
It's not what they can afford, it's what's available to them.
chinese made Craftsman are priced the same as the USA versions they replaced. The retailer reaps the savings, not the customer.
Read a book titled "Made in China - Poorly". One man's experiences being a middle man between Chinese manufacturers and American retailers.
If you work with your tools a lot, you should buy a few really nice ones to see how you like them, if there is a difference that is worth the money to you.
I've gotten so I really like some tools of specific brands, and buy them every chance I can, usually used. Others I don't care that much as long as it works.
In 1960 everything from Japan was junk, nobody could touch American, English, and German electronics. By 1985 Japan was the world leader in all but a few categories. We don't have a lot of time to get smart people into government, and get manufacturing going again in the USA.
Manufacturing will be 90% robots and automation in a few years. This isn't the 30's.
Not really, since it does not apply to everyone. If someone wants and can afford SO tools, then that if fine, IMO.
But, when someone says "gee, I wish I could afford a lift!", because they really wish they had one, but own expensive, over priced tools, that they use lightly, what am I supposed to think? this might be the same person, that cannot live without a $200 Bose table radio, or "versache" luggage.
Not just with tools, but many people have to have "the best", whether it's a house, car, clothes, watches, cell phones - but at the expense, of other things, that may be important, in some cases paying bills, properly feeding their kids, or saving for old age.
While I am with you on the using what you want concept the opposite is true in regards to the financial side. they will get about 1/3 for the snaps and the HF regularly sees its price in sales and auctions. Second,,, they have been lasting that long and if they were to go in the trash after being depreciated over a year or 2 its pretty much irrelevant. Its simply not the same tossing a 1$ wrench one bought recent as a 30$ one in yesterdays dollars..
In the thread above you mention they bring 1/2 if they are in good condition, this is an estimate of at least 50% in error.When I'm gone after using my tools for 30+ years, my boys will get most of what I paid for them if
Exactly. Politicians talk about bringing manufacturing back, what they leave out is the automation part. If they do bring back manufacturing to the U.S. I'm not counting on a lot of job creation
Your attitude toward this guy really makes no sense. There was no mention of him having thousands of dollars worth of tools that were causing him financial hardship. And we're talking about a lift, not groceries. You demonized this guy based on assumptions.
When you break it out this way and from real experience, not simply repeating clichés this is a pretty accurate assessment of tools,,,,, which has nothing to do with how people feel about them, jobs, China etc but the actual tools. I have seen a lot of this junk used in a rough world and I am really impressed with some of it, as was said the losers aint but a handful and lunch money over a decade.I have bling that I have to wear out to get my moneys worth and India junk that had become profitable the first job, still kicking a decade later.
I know which was the better investment.
The forgotten cheapy losers were easily offset by the more numerous winners in terms of value recovered.
But still in my case a bling ratchet to use with dreaded import sockets with nearly a decade of flawless use is all I need.
Your mileage should vary, you don't do the same jobs I do.
Started working at GM in October, 1966. Wages were $2.91 per hour. Retired in November, 2011. Wages were $29.10 per hour.
Started working at GM in October, 1966. Wages were $2.91 per hour. Retired in November, 2011. Wages were $29.10 per hour.
Inflation is almost inline with that increase. 2.91 in 1966 is worth 20.20 in 2011. Not too far off.
Which means 45 years of work there was only worth $8.90 extra an hour.
What was a new worker getting in 2011 ?
Which means 45 years of work there was only worth $8.90 extra an hour.
What was a new worker getting in 2011 ?
Which means 45 years of work there was only worth $8.90 extra an hour.
What was a new worker getting in 2011 ?
+ 45 years of retirement match & healthcare coverage. Wages are only part of an employees compensation.
I wouldnt make that claim. Generally pay in manufacturing facilities goes up as seniority does. I remember during the auto industry collapsed seeing an article about some of the most senior plant assemblers who got offered early retirement were making upwards of $100/hr.
That was the point I was making 45 years of seniority was only worth $8.90 in real terms or as later answered $11.10 over a new employee. Blue collar wages have got worse in real terms and there is less chance to progress upwards in a company today, you basically stay at or near the bottom unless you improve your education and get a better job.