Anyone ever taken little kids with them on a 90 minute drive to possibly buy a Wilton? That's what I'm considering this weekend while the wife is out of town.

Question for the vise "re-sellers":
A friend of mine gave me this older Wilton Schiller Park era C3 to sell for him do to recent health issues. Other than some surface rust from sitting, it's in incredible condition, and actually, I don't think it's ever been used. There are no errant grind, hammer, or weld marks on it anywhere. And as you can see by the picture of the jaws, it doesn't look like it has ever even held anything. It has been sitting in a barn for about 30 years according to him.
Anyway, I'm going to probably sell it on Ebay to try and squeeze every last dollar out of it for him. My question is, should I just clean up the loose rust and sell it as it is, or take it apart and give it a full blown nut and bolt restore? Would the difference in the final selling price justify the labor of the restore?
Thanks in advance for any input.
A couple of things come to mind. First off, while eBay will usually get you the highest price, you pay them 10%, and then PayPal another 2.9% of the total price including any shipping. If you can sell it another way, you might wind up with more money in hand for your friend.
The vise itself is in great condition and most/many 100lb+ vises have lived a hard life since normally they are bought by businesses who put them to work and the people using them don't really care much about them.
That puts you in a tough spot. As it sits, the vise is more than good enough to lube and bolt on a bench/stand and go to work at a company looking for a bargain rather than spend $1,700 on a new C3. They won't care that it hasn't been painted and polished, and might appreciate the fact they can see the history, and obvious lack of use.
I've sold a number of 5" and larger Wiltons to companies lately, and they all make the comment "it doesn't have to be pretty for our uses" but I typically deliver something looking closer to new anyway because I want to be associated with nice work.
If you sell to someone who simply wants a big bad vise for bragging rights, they're probably going to want it painted, polished and looking better than new.
I might just remove the jaws, spindle, and swivel locks, then clean them up nicely the reassemble it and put it up for sale with the original paint. It'll look nice, won't look "dirty" and will still be an original vise that isn't hiding damage or repairs under fresh paint.
I think you might be surprised at the response you'd get listing it locally....heck, if I was within a couple of hours I'd make you an offer!
Wow, wish there was a soda can in that Vanderman photo because that sucker must be HUUUUUUUGE! If a No. 3 is 160lbs, that No. 5 must be 300+
Tone: i have only seen Vanderman's #0, #1, & #3's listed and i've only seen pictures of the #0 & #3. I didn't know they made a #5, but that might be one of the nicest 100+ year old castings i've seen. yours looks pristine under that surface rust and i think that might be the first what looks like original nut that bolts under the workbench too.
here's the catalog page i saved and maybe one of the other members has some information on it. NICE FIND!!!
That vanderman must be an absolute beast! The one I saw at drives place is easily the heaviest vise of its size I've ever seen. Even made my dad's reed 32 look light for a 4.5"
Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
Wow, wish there was a soda can in that Vanderman photo because that sucker must be HUUUUUUUGE! If a No. 3 is 160lbs, that No. 5 must be 300+
Meatsis: I'm thinking the same thing, but it is fairly big cause the handle on the bolt for the underneath the bench swivel part looks pretty small and i bet it's at least 4 inches and maybe 6 inches. what really has me shaking my head is the #5 cause since i bought my Vanderman a few years ago and did some research and watch for them all over the USA i haven't seen one bigger than a #3.
ALL: anybody else know more about these VANDERMANS STEAMFITTER'S that maybe were the best and maybe the most expensive vises made in the late 1800's?
A friend picked up this Vanderman No.5 steam fitter vise and is having trouble locating any info on it. Some info on the lower numbered Vanderman's is out there, and of course that monster No. 3 that popped up here a few weeks ago. Having difficulty finding info on No. 5 - anyone seen one of these?
Very interesting and thanks for posting
With new jaws from Dr. Scott I presume?![]()
I have a number three, and googled up the patents a while back. The two notches in the back were for bending pipe, and the vise came with cylinder piece that fit in the notch. The cylinder was split length wise so it was actually two pieces. The outside was straight, but the inside had a bend to faciliate pipe bending. I have a pdf of the patent somewhere, not sure how to post it.
They are way overbuilt. The screw on mine is about 1.75", and the nut is at least 6 inches long and cast into the body. The slide is forged steel, and cast into the dynamic jaw. The clamping jaws are riveted in place, the pipe jaws are removable. Mine weighs 165.
Interesting thing about the number 5 , is that the makers mark is cast on the opposite side of the vise from all the others I've seen, and doesn't have a date, or patent info. It also lists East Hampton as the location of manufacture, while all the others I've seen show Willamantic, and Willamantic is listed in the original patent application.
Vanderman died at a relatively early age, perhaps the business was sold to another manufacturer, or perhaps they started in East Hampton. A little investigation might bring some answers. Very interesting and thanks for posting
Bellaireroad
Here are the images from Vanderman's patent of 1884 and a URL to the full patent at USPTO.
URL:
http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNu...6S1=0303345.PN.%26OS=pn/303345%26RS=PN/303345
Vanderman had several others, but no time right now for more.
JKB
A friend picked up this Vanderman No.5 steam fitter vise and is having trouble locating any info on it. Some info on the lower numbered Vanderman's is out there, and of course that monster No. 3 that popped up here a few weeks ago. Having difficulty finding info on No. 5 - anyone seen one of these?
Shouldn't be any standing around involved G-Man... Load that baby up!![]()