Damaged equipment and wiring from heat generated by drawing inrush currents for longer than they're designed for. Causes voltage sag on the affected system for other equipment; potential for nuisance tripping and damage. The inverse time-delay action of circuit breakers can expose equipment to moderate overcurrents until the thermal action kicks in. Problems are compounded if the loads are cycling i.e. frequent on/off.
In-rush current draw time would not increase substantially(in-rush current occurs in 100s of a millisecond) due to voltage drop. This isnt a safety concern as the wire does not experience over-current long enough to heat up anyways.
In-rush currents are already over the ampacity of the wire to begin with.
Ive metered many loads with my Fluke 381 that has special circuitry for measuring in-rush current.
My 3 ton air conditioner pulls 85a on startup over #10 wire. Wire is sized correctly per nameplate.
Nuisance tripping occurs even when there is no voltage drop due to improperly sized breakers. This is not a safety issue either otherwise we would hear about it on a large scale. Monthly there are threads on here about nuisance tripping. And yet no safety problems resulted.
the thermal overloads on motors are sized for the current at rated voltage. So they would trip if the current got above that due to voltage drop. Again, this is a non-issue.
Ive seen this happen before. It didnt cause a safety issue.
All of your examples here do not hold water.
Voltage drop is a safety concern in other jurisdictions. I easily found 3 regulatory documents that set a limit. Engineers often supercede Code requirements anyway. Many smaller jobs do not involve an architect or engineer. Is 3% simply a rough rule-of-thumb for the USA?
3% is for feeders, 5% is for branch circuits.
If this was such a serious issue as you claim, the NEC wouldve addressed it long ago.
But its not, so youre grasping at straws....
