Lucid Moments
Well-known member
You actually have an F80 from my personal box, not from the one I bought a couple of weeks ago. I went through my box to see if the new one was needed, and found I already had two in there, so I pulled one extra out to sell! Since I don't remember where or when I originally bought that one, you've got a real twisted web to follow up on to make sure it is paid for. I don't think I bought it new, I bought my T72's new, but I got the F80's in trade somewhere. Plus, I've used the three I own interchangeably for a couple of years. How are you going to tell which one came from where?
However, in the case of the tools and box i bought, there was no registered lien on them (I actually did check) and the guys story checks out all the way. He was a good solid guy, millright, and the tools and the story all matched up. What I was amused by in my original thread was guys that thought I should somehow call corporate snap-on and ask them if the tools and box (no serial numbers) were paid for. How would Snap-on know that? How would they identify my non-distinctive tools from the millions of other identical ones they sell all the time? I just sent back my fhflf80 for warranty for chrome peeling. (Previous purchase, not from recent box) Is SO going to check that it's paid off before they send me the warranty one back? It's date coded 2018, so it's new enough maybe money is still owed on it? How would they tell it apart from every other one out there?
So, what if I was to sell my personal tool box and snap-on tools, which I have paid cash for, never on credit? To satisfy the due diligence that buyers should do, I should provide them with a affidavit of lien release, signed by the original seller (Snap-on). I'm almost amused enough to call Snap-on corporate, and ask them to sign a lien release on MY personal tools, so that I can sell them to a buyer with a clean record. I'd bet they won't do that. If they won't do that, how do you ever clear the potential lien on a box or tools that were originally bought from Snap-on? Maybe I could get my local Snap-on guy to buy my box for $1, and resell to me for $50 with a receipt to clear the title on it? Maybe finance the $50, let them file a lien, and then get a lien release when I pay the $50 off? Now we're starting to get ridiculous. The law doesn't require you to do stuff like this. It just requires you to act in good faith in not buying something that could reasonably be expected to be stolen.
Every time this whole topic comes up, it's amusing how much speculation there is. I'd love to find a case that I could read that actually allowed a judgement against a third party that bought snap-on tools in good faith from a previous owner who owed money to snap-on. Not on a large, identifiable thing like a scanner or tool box, but on individual, non-distinguishable tools. Not a scammer that bought a box knowing it was illegitimate, and got caught, but someone who bought in good faith. I don't think there's a court in the US that would rule in favor of the repossession of unidentified tools on a lien on a non-specific contract that just says "all tools branded Snap-on in possession of debtor". When the debtor isn't in possession, but a third party is.
In the similar cases I have had direct experience with (two that I recall) the dealer asked for the receipt, and paid the buyer back the exact amount on the receipt, and then took the tools. He then added the receipted amount to the original parties bill, and worked at collecting that through other means. One of those I was actually involved with. A friend that owned a pawn shop had taken in a nice upper and lower box, that I had agreed to buy for the failed pawn fee. We checked with the dealer first (I knew him personally), and found that the buyer had skipped town without paying. The dealer bought them back for the pawn instead. I had a similar situation I knew of where a friend bought tools from a fellow tech leaving town. The dealer bought back those tools for the receipted amount, and then sold them back to the tech to clear the title, but added the purchase price to the debtors bill, and subtracted what he sold them for from the total bill as required by law.
Exactly this
It's not that bad in south Jersey(except maybe the Vineland/Millville depressed area) nor across the river here in SE Pa.