I watched that video (and have read other stuff on the topic). I came out of it thinking, okay, Phillips was easier to license and Ford got the license and blah blah blah.
But it's an inferior product. No fastener in the world strips out half as easily as them. Every single human being on the planet has probably sworn at a Phillips screw stripping out.
But somehow the reasons we got them were more important than the drawback of it being a terrible product? Why did so few people/companies care about delivering a product that people could use?
All this talk about how camming out was so useful for early manufacturing machines. How the licensing was so much better for companies like Ford. But as a consumer, I don't care about those things and I'm not sure why this terrible screw design was so excessively successful. If Ford loved those screws so much, he could have bought them. But anyone using a hand screwdriver would've benefitted more with a non-cam-out screw design. Why were those needs ignored? Maybe I'm too young to understand just how much pull a company like Ford had? I don't know. It just seems crazy to me. Like "Okay, Ford liked them... so what?" and "Okay, so the design was offered as a license, which made things easy, but the product was ****..."
(yes, I REALLY hate Phillips screws)