To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Conductor Size for a Garage Service

Chuckster in NJ

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
2,319
Location
Hunterdon County NJ
I have a friend of mine who has a stand alone garage with a dedicated single phase overhead service. The electrical contractor used 200 amp SEU Aluminum service cable (4/0) feeding a 200 amp main breaker. I believe this is a violation because you can only "de-rate" service conductors (83%) on a residential DWELLING as per the NEC……. NOT on a "stand alone garage" with a commercial electric rate.
I interpret that service feeder conductors to a "stand alone garage" shall be sized as per the main breaker rating and NOT de-rated like a residential dwelling…….. So I say given that the job is done in order to make it "code compliant" (least expensive way) he should change the existing 200 amp main breaker to a 175 amp main breaker.
The service was inspected and approved by the local inspector and my friend feels the electrical contractor "exceeded" minimum requirements set by the NEC.
What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

alfredeneuman

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
4,593
Location
Fullerton, CA
4/0 aluminum has an ampacity of 180A which doesn't correspond to a standard breaker size.
When it doesn't the next standard breaker (200) can be used as long as the total calculated load doesn't exceed 180A.
NEC 240.3(B)
 

wyliesdiesels

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
20,071
Location
Modesto, CA
I have a friend of mine who has a stand alone garage with a dedicated single phase overhead service. The electrical contractor used 200 amp SEU Aluminum service cable (4/0) feeding a 200 amp main breaker. I believe this is a violation because you can only "de-rate" service conductors (83%) on a residential DWELLING as per the NEC……. NOT on a "stand alone garage" with a commercial electric rate.
I interpret that service feeder conductors to a "stand alone garage" shall be sized as per the main breaker rating and NOT de-rated like a residential dwelling…….. So I say given that the job is done in order to make it "code compliant" (least expensive way) he should change the existing 200 amp main breaker to a 175 amp main breaker.
The service was inspected and approved by the local inspector and my friend feels the electrical contractor "exceeded" minimum requirements set by the NEC.
What are your thoughts?
What is the calculated load of the building?

Good luck finding a 175a or 180a main breaker.

The 200a main is code compliant as long as the load doesnt exceed 180a
 

alfredeneuman

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
4,593
Location
Fullerton, CA
As per manufacturers spec, they chart says this SEU cannot be used on a stand alone garage. This cable would be approved for use on a residential DWELLING.


00B1B5E6-379F-4DE3-8112-B1783C688E9E.jpegBFBBBE63-0F59-434D-82DC-85BA34DC2A95.jpeg
Would you point out where it says that?

NEC 338.10 (B)(4)(b)
Type USE cable installed as underground feeder and branch circuit cable shall comply
with Part II of Article 340.
 
OP
C

Chuckster in NJ

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
2,319
Location
Hunterdon County NJ
Would you point out where it says that?
Look in the lower right hand corner of the chart….. It says "DWELLING" could I be reading the chart wrong?
NEC 338.10 (B)(4)(b)
Type USE cable installed as underground feeder and branch circuit cable shall comply
with Part II of Article 340.
This is an overhead service.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

alfredeneuman

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
4,593
Location
Fullerton, CA
Look in the lower right hand corner of the chart….. It says "DWELLING" could I be reading the chart wrong?

This is an overhead service.
Yes you're reading it wrong. It doesn't exclude any other uses.
USE=SEU and it only needs to be marked as suitable for aboveground use to be used overhead
 

wyliesdiesels

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
20,071
Location
Modesto, CA
Look in the lower right hand corner of the chart….. It says "DWELLING" could I be reading the chart wrong?

This is an overhead service.
Youre totally misreading or misinterpreting the code

Code doesnt prohibit use of SEU in non dwelling buildings

I suggest you grab a code book and read through the applicable code sections a couple times

SEU can be used for connection to the overhead service drop. Its done all the time.
 
OP
C

Chuckster in NJ

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
2,319
Location
Hunterdon County NJ
Youre totally misreading or misinterpreting the code

Code doesnt prohibit use of SEU in non dwelling buildings

I suggest you grab a code book and read through the applicable code sections a couple times

SEU can be used for connection to the overhead service drop. Its done all the time.
TRUE! I understand where you can use the cable however the 200 amp rating on the chart is for a "dwelling" and not a stand alone garage.….. I have always been taught that you can only de-rate service conductors on a dwelling.
NOT to "beat this to death" but I just wanted to get an opinion from others.
 

wyliesdiesels

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
20,071
Location
Modesto, CA
TRUE! I understand where you can use the cable however the 200 amp rating on the chart is for a "dwelling" and not a stand alone garage.….. I have always been taught that you can only de-rate service conductors on a dwelling.
NOT to "beat this to death" but I just wanted to get an opinion from others.
there is no derating going on. #4 AL good for 180a however there is no 180a breaker so code allows upsizing of the breaker to the next standard size as long as the load is 180a or less.... but this is the third time explaining this....
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom