To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Craftsman Drill Press

bagged89s10

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
4,607
Location
CT
What's the proper belt tensioning procedure for the vari-slo setup? I can't seem to get the correct tension to be able to go thru all the speeds once the dp is running. Is it just that my old belts are stretched and I need to get new ones?
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
What's the proper belt tensioning procedure for the vari-slo setup? I can't seem to get the correct tension to be able to go thru all the speeds once the dp is running. Is it just that my old belts are stretched and I need to get new ones?

I'm afraid I won't be much help with Vari-Slo issues. I'm not a big fan of them. IMHO, they're too finicky, too fragile, and too noisy. I much prefer the Multi-Speed Attachment. I had a V-S for a short time, put new belts on it and flipped it.

I can only suggest re-reading the installation instructions and verifying that the belts are correct and in their proper location. You never know what a previous owner did with it or to it.

Vari-Slow belts:
- A19
- motor pulley to Vari-Slo rear pulley, 21" (top)
- A15 - Vari-Slo rear pulley to Vari-Slo front pulley, 17" (middle)
- A18 - Vari-Slo front pulley to spindle pulley, 20" (bottom)

EDIT:
IMO, AX19, AX15 and AX18 COGGED belts would be better choices.

1738750425449.png
 
Last edited:

bagged89s10

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
4,607
Location
CT
I'm afraid I won't be much help with Vari-Slo issues. I'm not a big fan of them. IMHO, they're too finicky, too fragile, and too noisy. I much prefer the Multi-Speed Attachment. I had a V-S for a short time, put new belts on it and flipped it.

I can only suggest re-reading the installation instructions and verifying that the belts are correct and in their proper location. You never know what a previous owner did with it or to it.

Vari-Slow belts:
- A19 - motor pulley to Vari-Slo rear pulley, 21" (top)
- A15 - Vari-Slo rear pulley to Vari-Slo front pulley, 17" (middle)
- A18 - Vari-Slo front pulley to spindle pulley, 20" (bottom)



Yeah it does seem a bit finicky. I couldn't pass it up for $80 though. This is the best I got it to work with the current belts.once I take it all apart and restore it, I think it will suit my needs. If not, I'll sell it.


ImageUploadedByTapatalk1451574476.290632.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1451574490.894939.jpg
 
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
Yeah it does seem a bit finicky. I couldn't pass it up for $80 though. This is the best I got it to work with the current belts.once I take it all apart and restore it, I think it will suit my needs. If not, I'll sell it.

No, for $80, I wouldn't have passed on it either.

In your video, if that's as far to the right as the control arm moves, there is something wrong. I'm thinking incorrect belt(s), but it's just speculation on my part. The clamping pad replacement gizmo suggests that the previous owner was messing with it.
 
Last edited:

bagged89s10

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
4,607
Location
CT
No, for $80, I wouldn't have passed on it either.



In your video, if that's as far to the right as the control arm moves, there is something wrong. I'm thinking incorrect belt(s), but it's just speculation on my part. The clamping pad replacement gizmo suggests that the previous owner was messing with it.



yeah that's as far as it will go. If i loosen the belt tension on the motor, then I can move the speed all the way to the right. But then the belt just slips when i move the speed to the low setting. The previous owner was a machinist and I'm sure he messed with it. But who knows what the son did with it after the guy passed.

Just check out this table top the previous owner built for it with an overkill light mount.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1451577997.620391.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1451578009.726922.jpg

And for whatever reason all the badges are missing including the one on the motor.
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1451578040.609146.jpg
 
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
yeah that's as far as it will go. If i loosen the belt tension on the motor, then I can move the speed all the way to the right. But then the belt just slips when i move the speed to the low setting. The previous owner was a machinist and I'm sure he messed with it. But who knows what the son did with it after the guy passed.

The more I study your pictures and compare them to mine, I'm quite certain you have an incorrect belt(s).

1738749805529.png

In both pictures, the control arm is set to the slowest speed, which positions the front V-S pulley as far back as it will go.

The front belt on yours is positioned in the middle of the front V-S pulley, whereas mine is at the smallest point of the front V-S pulley.

The middle belt on your V-S is in the middle of both V-S pulleys, whereas mine is at the largest point on the front V-S pulley and the smallest point of the rear V-S pulley.

At minimum, your front belt is too long. New belts will solve that issue.
 
Last edited:
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
Just check out this table top the previous owner built for it with an overkill light mount.

And for whatever reason all the badges are missing including the one on the motor.

That table is actually pretty nice. Plenty big enough for a vise and very good edges for clamps.
 

bagged89s10

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
4,607
Location
CT
The more I study your pictures and compare them to mine, I'm quite certain you have an incorrect belt(s).


In both pictures, the control arm is set to the slowest speed, which positions the front V-S pulley as far back as it will go.
The front belt on yours is positioned in the middle of the front V-S pulley, whereas mine is at the smallest point of the front V-S pulley.
The middle belt on your V-S is in the middle of both V-S pulleys, whereas mine is at the largest point on the front V-S pulley and the smallest point of the rear V-S pulley. At minimum, your front belt is too long. New belts will solve that issue.



That table is actually pretty nice. Plenty big enough for a vise and very good edges for clamps.


Maybe the previous owner setup it up this way to keep it a slower speed drill press. He was a machinist and used it for metalwork. Either way, I will be ordering new belts. I will measure the currents belts and heck the sizes as well.

Yes I like the table as well. I've always had to rig something up when wanting to clamp a large piece in place.

Edit: I measured the outside diameter of the belts with a flexible measure tape.

Rear belt. From the motor pulley to the v-s pulley 21.25". This is 0.25" too long

Middle belt. Between the 2 v-s pulleys 18.25". This is 1.25" too long.

Front belt. From the v-s pulley to the front spindle pulley 22.25". This is 2.25" too long.

If I measured correctly the belts, the middle and front belts are significantly stretched.
 
Last edited:
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
Edit: I measured the outside diameter of the belts with a flexible measure tape.

Rear belt. From the motor pulley to the v-s pulley 21.25". This is 0.25" too long

Middle belt. Between the 2 v-s pulleys 18.25". This is 1.25" too long.

Front belt. From the v-s pulley to the front spindle pulley 22.25". This is 2.25" too long.

If I measured correctly the belts, the middle and front belts are significantly stretched.

I could see a 0.25 stretch, but 1.25 and 2.25 seems unlikely. Are there any manufacturer part number markings on those belts?
 
Last edited:
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
This thread passed the 30000-views milestone today. Thanks for stopping in!
 
Last edited:

A E Numan

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
234
Location
Portland Oregon
Part of the set up instructions for the Vari-Slo concern where on the head, the head casting assy. is mounted. After I replaced all of the belts I ran the machine wile moving the control knob all the way to the left then turn the head casting assy. to line up the pointer with the "300" on the scale. That's supposed to give you the full range of speed's
 

bagged89s10

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
4,607
Location
CT
Part of the set up instructions for the Vari-Slo concern where on the head, the head casting assy. is mounted. After I replaced all of the belts I ran the machine wile moving the control knob all the way to the left then turn the head casting assy. to line up the pointer with the "300" on the scale. That's supposed to give you the full range of speed's


I'll try that. I was thinking the vari-slo pulley was supposed to be perfectly in the center but obviously it wasn't working. My mistake for loosening he head for transport and not noting the position of the pulley setup.
 

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
I wanted to thank Frank and all others that have posted great information here. You inspired me to go out and find my own Craftsman 100/150 and restore it. I ended up picking up an early 100 bench top unit for myself which I completely refurbished in red. My search then turned up a great deal on a very good condition newer 150 floor standing unit that only needed light work. I cleaned that one up and gave it to my sister in law for a birthday present.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3270.jpg
    IMG_3270.jpg
    145.3 KB · Views: 274
  • IMG_3274.jpg
    IMG_3274.jpg
    138 KB · Views: 247
  • IMG_3272.jpg
    IMG_3272.jpg
    141.1 KB · Views: 238
  • IMG_3277.jpg
    IMG_3277.jpg
    135.8 KB · Views: 194
  • IMG_3276.jpg
    IMG_3276.jpg
    140.4 KB · Views: 222
Last edited:

nine4gmc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
14,357
Location
Dallas
Re: The Classic Craftsman 100/150 Drill Press

Pretty sure that red bench model is a 100 but the floor model is a 150. Does the bench model have a tilt table? Excel

Excellent job on the resto, thanks for posting and I doubt I could have given the floor model away, can't beat a good pair! [emoji38]

Sent from my SM-T230NU using Tapatalk
 
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
Re: The Classic Craftsman 100/150 Drill Press

Pretty sure that red bench model is a 100 but the floor model is a 150. Does the bench model have a tilt table? Excel

Excellent job on the resto, thanks for posting and I doubt I could have given the floor model away, can't beat a good pair! [emoji38]

Sent from my SM-T230NU using Tapatalk

Ditto ^^^.

I wanted to thank Frank and all others that have posted great information here. You inspired me to go out and find my own Craftsman 150 and restore it. I ended up picking up an early 150 bench top unit for myself which I completely refurbished in red. My search then turned up a great deal on a very good condition newer 150 floor standing unit that only needed light work. I cleaned that one up and gave it to my sister in law for a birthday present.

Very nice overhaul on the 100! The 150 looks great too!

I believe the 100 is pre-1952.

Is that engine-turned adhesive film on the 150 motor? It looks good!
 
Last edited:

bagged89s10

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
4,607
Location
CT
I wanted to thank Frank and all others that have posted great information here. You inspired me to go out and find my own Craftsman 150 and restore it. I ended up picking up an early 150 bench top unit for myself which I completely refurbished in red. My search then turned up a great deal on a very good condition newer 150 floor standing unit that only needed light work. I cleaned that one up and gave it to my sister in law for a birthday present.


Awesome restorations. That bench top is a 100 and looks awesome in red!
 

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
Thanks for the compliments. It was fun working on these two drills. Unfortunately I just don't have enough room in my shop to keep that 150. Not enough free floor space.

Frank, yes that is engine turned adhesive I used on the center section of the motor on the 150. It is a Craftsman 1/2 HP motor, but it was a gold brown and looked out of place with the gray drill. So I pulled it apart, clean everything, repainted the motor, and used the adhesive on the center of the motor for a little extra pizzazz.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
I took some tips from other people's projects when I redid the 100. I made an aluminum (6061) end cap on a lathe that inserts into the end of the 100's column. That allowed me to chuck the column into the lathe and polish it up.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3088.jpg
    IMG_3088.jpg
    140.2 KB · Views: 137
  • IMG_3096.jpg
    IMG_3096.jpg
    141.5 KB · Views: 141
  • IMG_3085.jpg
    IMG_3085.jpg
    140.6 KB · Views: 131
  • IMG_3084.jpg
    IMG_3084.jpg
    130.6 KB · Views: 119
  • IMG_3083.jpg
    IMG_3083.jpg
    135.8 KB · Views: 121
  • IMG_3080.jpg
    IMG_3080.jpg
    141.3 KB · Views: 132
  • IMG_3091.jpg
    IMG_3091.jpg
    138.9 KB · Views: 132
Last edited:

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
I am now turning that aluminum end cap I made into a slow speed option using new high speed double shielded bearings, 5/8" stainless steel D shaft, and a new four step pulley. I've offset bored the end cap for the shaft and made 1 3/8" seats for the bearings so it will be eccentric like the original factory option and you can twist it in the end of the column to adjust belt tension. I'll follow up with some pics documenting this project when I am done.
 
Last edited:

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
Here you can see the end cap with the offset bore for the shaft and the bearings. I then bolted the end cap to the tilting table on my 100, turned it 90 degrees, and used milling bits to make the holes for grub screws to secure the bearings in place. I then tilted the table a bit off 90 degrees and drilled the hole for the grub screw to lock the rotation of the end cap in the column once belt tension is set. Finally there are three pics with the shaft and bearings installed and the collars on the shaft preventing axial play.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3296.jpg
    IMG_3296.jpg
    128.8 KB · Views: 142
  • IMG_3297.jpg
    IMG_3297.jpg
    127.6 KB · Views: 149
  • IMG_3295.jpg
    IMG_3295.jpg
    134.9 KB · Views: 155
  • IMG_3289.jpg
    IMG_3289.jpg
    137.9 KB · Views: 157
  • IMG_3281.jpg
    IMG_3281.jpg
    135.7 KB · Views: 140
  • IMG_3283.jpg
    IMG_3283.jpg
    138.5 KB · Views: 169

A E Numan

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
234
Location
Portland Oregon
That's a wonderful job! that should last forever with those bearings. Nice use of the tilt table, I have them on two of my drills but have never used that feature. Well Done!
 

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
Re: The Classic Craftsman 100/150 Drill Press

How far offset is the shaft?

I didn't measure the shaft center line when I set the offset bore location. I simply did as much offset as I could while leaving enough "meat" around the bearing at the closest point of approach to the edge. Here is a picture of the bottom of the end cap showing how close the bearing bore is to the edge. I'll measure it for you later, but I'd guess the center line of the shaft is about 3/4" offset, allowing about 1.5" of total adjustment.

I must admit I didn't really need to do the offset, as I'll be using link belts. I just did the offset for the hell of it, for the additional challenge on the project, and because that was how the original ones were done. It would have been easier to bore the hole for the shaft and the bearing seats on the lathe on the center line (as opposed to having to set it up on the milling machine for the offset bore) and just rely on the adjustment of the link belt to get proper belt tension. I think this is cooler though.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3282.jpg
    IMG_3282.jpg
    138.6 KB · Views: 80
Last edited:
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
Here you can see the end cap with the offset bore for the shaft and the bearings. I then bolted the end cap to the tilting table on my 100, turned it 90 degrees, and used milling bits to make the holes for grub screws to secure the bearings in place. I then tilted the table a bit off 90 degrees and drilled the hole for the grub screw to lock the rotation of the end cap in the column once belt tension is set. Finally there are three pics with the shaft and bearings installed and the collars on the shaft preventing axial play.

Very nice execution!

What I really like about that design is that you can use two single pulleys, say 2" and up to 8" or more to get that chuck really slow for tapping.

Are those collars temporary or permanent? Do they interfere with belt alignment?
 
Last edited:

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
Very nice execution!

What I really like about that design is that you can use two single pulleys, say 2" and up to 8" or more to get that chuck really slow for tapping.

Are those collars temporary or permanent? Do they interfere with pulley alignment?

Thanks Frank. I hadn't thought of using two separate pulley's, but that would definitely be possible for an even greater range of speeds if needed. I picked up a standard four step pulley from Granger that matches the stock pulleys' four steps (2", 3", 4", 5"). So I should have the same range as the original slo-speed option to start. If I need more range than that, I'll look into custom pulley options.

The collars are held in place by grub screws and thus can be moved and removed very easily, so I can move the axel up and down as needed. I haven't done the final mount with the pulley, but that will be tonight most likely. I do not believe the collar will interfere with the pulley as I believe it has ample room "inside" it when it is mounted with the large diameter at the bottom. If there is interference with the collar that does not let the pulley sit low enough to be aligned with the pulley on the spindle, I'll just figure out the needed axel height and then cut a groove in the axel for a C clip to replace the collar. I don't think that will be needed though.
 
Last edited:

kevrobster

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2014
Messages
23
Thanks Frank. I hadn't thought of using two separate pulley's, but that would definitely be possible for an even greater range of speeds if needed. I picked up a standard four step pulley from Granger that matches the stock pulleys' four steps. So I should have the same range as the original slo-speed option to start. If I need more range than that, I'll look into custom pulley options.

The collars are held in place by grub screws and thus can be moved and removed very easily. Thus I can move the axel up and down as needed. I haven't done the final mount with the pulley, but that will be tonight most likely. I do not believe the collar will interfere with the pulley as I believe it has ample room "inside" it when it is mounted with the large diameter at the bottom. If there is interference with the collar that does not let the pulley site low enough to be aligned with the pulley on the spindle, I'll just figure out the needed axel height and then cut a groove in the axel for a C clip to replace the collar. I don't think that will be needed though.
Could you share the link to the pulley you purchased? I am interested in doing this myself, though I have nowhere near the skill you have showed!
 

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
Could you share the link to the pulley you purchased? I am interested in doing this myself, though I have nowhere near the skill you have showed!

I purchased the pulley from Grainger. $42.15 each - http://www.grainger.com/product/CON...3e6f9b1afec9c16eb72b17dc2ff2aea66&origin=prod

The rest of the parts I bought from McMaster Carr:

6" long 5/8" diameter D-shaft $10.96 each - http://www.mcmaster.com/#8632t147/=10o2n9h

Bearings $8.33 each - http://www.mcmaster.com/#60355k602/=10o2nh2

Collars $1.45 each - http://www.mcmaster.com/#6432k18/=10o2nmy

Total cost in parts was $72.67, plus the cost of the 6061 aluminum stock (about $5). So less than $80 total, plus my time.

One additional thought: a friend pointed out that if you are handy with and have access to a 3D printer, your could print out an end cap to meet your needs rather than making it out of aluminum like I did. Just print it out and assemble it with the parts I list out above. It probably wouldn't be strong enough to use to chuck the column in a lathe for polishing like I did, but it should be fine for use as a Slo-speed option.
 
Last edited:

nine4gmc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
14,357
Location
Dallas
Re: The Classic Craftsman 100/150 Drill Press

Awesome job RS!!

Sent from my SM-T230NU using Tapatalk
 

RHJO51

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
242
Location
Red Hook, NY 12571
I had posted about the 150 I purchased with the Vari-Slo. So I fixed the egged hole in the vari-slo control arm and attempted to re-intall it in the DP. Fairly straight forward, followed the directions. Problem is, the control arm doesn't line up well with the adjustment arm from the front casting - it's about a 1/4 " too high. I can put it together, but it's not straight. Or I can get it level, but I have to raise the front casting. Something is not quite right. Figured I'd ask here first. Been over it a few times, everything looks correct. Thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • 007.jpg
    007.jpg
    136.3 KB · Views: 120
  • 006.jpg
    006.jpg
    138.3 KB · Views: 117
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
I had posted about the 150 I purchased with the Vari-Slo. So I fixed the egged hole in the vari-slo control arm and attempted to re-intall it in the DP. Fairly straight forward, followed the directions. Problem is, the control arm doesn't line up well with the adjustment arm from the front casting - it's about a 1/4 " too high. I can put it together, but it's not straight. Or I can get it level, but I have to raise the front casting. Something is not quite right. Figured I'd ask here first. Been over it a few times, everything looks correct. Thoughts?

1779482855802.png

I would make sure the V-S and the head frame are adjusted on the column correctly. It seems the V-S is riding high or the head frame is low.


After studying your pictures more, something seems strange. Is the spindle pulley assembly fully seated into the head frame? It seems to be riding high. You should be able to see the top of the spindle at the top of the spindle pulley. Unless perhaps you have the quill assembly removed or lowered.
Place a straight edge across the head frame over the center of the pulley. The pulley should be 3/4" below the rim of the head frame.

You also have a couple washers on the front V-S pulley.

1779483003492.png


1/17/2016

This morning, I finally swapped in my reconditioned Craftsman motor on DP#3.

 
Last edited:

RSwannabe

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
403
Here are a few pictures of my completed slo-speed option. I did have to make a few changes to get the pulley to sit low enough to be in alignment with the pulley on the spindle. I trimmed the lip on the top of the end plug to let it sit lower in the column and did away with the upper retaining color on the axle. Now the pulley rides on a washer that bears directly on the upper bearing. With these changes the pulleys and belts line up nicely and works perfectly.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3329.jpg
    IMG_3329.jpg
    139.9 KB · Views: 179
  • IMG_3328.jpg
    IMG_3328.jpg
    132.6 KB · Views: 176
  • IMG_3327.jpg
    IMG_3327.jpg
    139.5 KB · Views: 197

Reversepolarity

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
422
Location
Washington State
Here are a few pictures of my completed slo-speed option. I did have to make a few changes to get the pulley to sit low enough to be in alignment with the pulley on the spindle. I trimmed the lip on the top of the end plug to let it sit lower in the column and did away with the upper retaining color on the axle. Now the pulley rides on a washer that bears directly on the upper bearing. With these changes the pulleys and belts line up nicely and works perfectly.


How do you like those belt?
I have no experience with them.
 

RHJO51

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
242
Location
Red Hook, NY 12571
When you are scratching your head, before you do anything stupid, ask the Guys who know. Frank, you were right on. I checked the space from the top of the head to the top of the pulley and sure enough it was 1/2" - my missing 1/4". When I looked from under neath I could see that the bearing was not against the retaining clip. I removed the quill and then the pulley spindle locking screws. A couple light taps to the top of the pulley with a block of wood seated the pulley spindle where it should be. The Vari-Slo lines up where it should now. With out Frank's observation it's likely I would not found the problem easily. Frank - you rock! Thank you!

It makes me wonder, with that egged out hole on the Vari-Slo control arm, I think the original owner had the same problem where the Vari-Slow was not aligned properly and over time the hole got egged. Perhaps the pulley spindle wasn't seated properly back then - Jim
 
OP
F

FrankLee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
3,548
Location
seMI, 48317
I had posted about the 150 I purchased with the Vari-Slo. So I fixed the egged hole in the vari-slo control arm and attempted to re-intall it in the DP. Fairly straight forward, followed the directions. Problem is, the control arm doesn't line up well with the adjustment arm from the front casting - it's about a 1/4 " too high. I can put it together, but it's not straight. Or I can get it level, but I have to raise the front casting. Something is not quite right. Figured I'd ask here first. Been over it a few times, everything looks correct. Thoughts?

I would make sure the V-S and the head frame are adjusted on the column correctly. It seems the V-S is riding high or the head frame is low.
 
Last edited:

CalsXS2

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
507
Frank. Is it ok to post mine here. Or should I start a new thread. I think you don't mind,,,lol

So I picked up the 1954 model 100. I almost feel bad. The kid said he wanted a bench model. I said I had a Harbor Freight piece of junk. He said he loved HF and wanted it. So now we're both happy,,,,lol.

It's got primer all over it. And an inch of crud. It will clean up though. What ***** is that the vari-slo is broken. But it can be welded.

So the reason for my post here.

1. Is the accu-link belts desirable on the vari-slo. Any guess how many from Harbor Freight I would need. I think 2. But I would have a lot left I think. Would I be better off getting them somewhere else.

2. I've got it all tore apart now so I can't look. But I wonder if I could use a table counter balance with the vari-slo. I think not. Opinions?

3. Frank. I've never seen how your counter balance attaches to the table. Any chance of a picture.

4. I thought I read in this thread to get shielded bearings. I talked tho accurate bearing today. I can get the 6205 zz. But the 6202-5/8 is a LL sealed. Are these acceptable. Thanks.

I know you guys like pictures,,,lol.
 

Attachments

  • 20160113_191555.jpg
    20160113_191555.jpg
    129.9 KB · Views: 132
  • 20160113_191519.jpg
    20160113_191519.jpg
    140.7 KB · Views: 118
  • 20160113_181132.jpg
    20160113_181132.jpg
    141.5 KB · Views: 117
  • 20160113_183754.jpg
    20160113_183754.jpg
    153.3 KB · Views: 122
  • 20160113_191609.jpg
    20160113_191609.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 146
  • 20160113_191544.jpg
    20160113_191544.jpg
    140 KB · Views: 158
  • 20160113_191457.jpg
    20160113_191457.jpg
    152.2 KB · Views: 116
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom