What we got here is one class holding the other responsible for problems the first one made.
I completely agree in the context but I think I want to rephrase it.
we have 2 classes blaming (not properly holding them accountable, just complaining) each other for problems that were caused by both their self-serving agendas in the past.
The fact is just like it's been said, you don't know what you want to do for the next 40 years in or right after high school. You don't even know if you want to do the same thing for that time.
Therefore, a lot of people have been encouraged to go to school, some have finished some have not, most of those have student loan debt now. Additionally some have degrees they (and we, rightly) call useless. Psych majors who are in it just to finish what they started. Art majors. etc. So the root of the problem really is parents and the K12 school system pushing them so hard into college, without clear goals or the proper encouragement into their strengths.
Do I think a 4 year degree is what every 40 year old ideally has? yes. Every 30 year old? probably. Every 20-something? If they can get into school, and start the degree, yes they should finish. Should everyone be pushed into starting college in their 20's? definitely not.
The problem is that the system isn't set up that way easily. Just like sberry says, the paper didn't matter in your 20's but it matters much more later in your career. How is a 20 year old going to predict that accurately? Maybe the Marines were the right choice. Maybe college was. Maybe starting a pot farm in Colorado is best. The bottom line is, any of those choices can still lead to a college degree for someone who recognizes the need and puts in the work. You don't have to be a full time student to succeed in school. You don't even have to show up anymore, so many real schools (no offense to Phoenix 'grads' if any are here) offering online classes or half & halfs for the ones that need hands on.
And guess what? All of these changes came from the people in the 60's, 70's, and 80's who were trying to 'break into' the education system. It was much more rigid then, you had some correspondence courses but that was a failed experiment at best. You had some commuter classes, evening & weekend classes, but it wasn't until more money went into recreating the junior colleges into tech schools in the 80's & 90's as a result of all that. Now there is nothing but complaints, more companies want paper to get in the door, to advance, to do what used to be possible with just time in position. Due to the relatively easy access to education that others fought to get in the past, it's now realistic for companies to hang that over your head and say 'our class is just reacting to what your class insisted on getting'.