I know where he (JD) is coming from... You see, anyone can view these forums and he doesn't want to give valuable information to his competitors on the net... I bet he might PM you though... maybe?
I'm going to ask some questions that haven't been asked that I think is information that should be known that is being withheld. Keep in mind, we don't sell into the DIY market at all anymore and I can't ever recall competing with Rocksolid/Citadel anywhere in the US... or world for that matter. So, my questions are not about any benefit to our own company. And, I don't know JD as far as I know.
Anyway, I've skimmed this a bit... We also make Polyaspartic Coatings and Polyureas. We don't offer those to just anyone. Most of what we do require much more chemical resistance than a polyaspartic can take. It sounds like the DIY product contains solvent but I never saw where it actually said if it did or didn't. To me, being a formulator and knowing Polyaspartic technology since the early 90s I've been a bit confused. It seems like there are two products being discussed but you never know which one is being talked about? From my point of view... there is a 100% solids product and then a DIY product that might be ? maybe about 80% solids guessing from the cure speed. I don't see anywhere where it is clear what you get for the money.
I mean, if you need a really quick return to service and exterior durability then a polyaspartic is a natural chemistry for that. Does anyone understand what you get for the money?
It seems like this is MUCH more expensive than the other options here and you end up with a much thinner floor than U-Coat It, Epoxy-Coat, or BudgetBob.
400 ft2 per gallon is about 4 mils if 100% solids and only 3.2 mils if 80% solids...
300ft2 per gallon is 5.3 mils if 100% solids and only 4.3 mils if 80% solids...
Most of you guys that we have worked with when we were in the DIY market had some beat up floors. (You guys must use your garages) Anyway, the thicker you put product down the more bad surface you are going to cover. Even most new floors have little potholes and pitmarks that would not be covered up with only a few mils.
So, what am I missing?
* PS, I'm not asking this to just open up an opportunity for RockSolid to plug his product. I don't sell them anything (that I know of) and if I know him I'm not aware of it (I know alot of people in the paint industry). Polyaspartic chemisty is good and may be a good option for some of you. But, I think when you are comparing floors you need to know exactly what you are getting for the money. I don't want to put words in JD's mouth but it just seemed that he was feeling like this wasn't adding up in his mind either.