rinny_tin_tin
Well-known member
One thing that needs to be considered when people try to make comparisons regarding energy efficiency, initial cost, and ROI is how often something is used. While on paper it might be meaningful that X is more efficient than y (and we are talking about efficient bulbs to begin with right?), it may take more years to achieve ROI than the homeowner might live in the house.
Honestly, If i averaged it out, I might use my garage a couple hours/week and even less so in the winter months. i expect once the kids get a little older and I can spend more time in the garage and take up projects again, but for now it may as well be a show room. CFLs + cans are going to cost me $200 whereas LED (I'm guessing) are going to cost considerably more.
Anyway, good conversation guys. My goal is to explore reasonable options...and LED may as well get a strong look, despite my initial ideas.
True - ROI is clearly impacted by scale. LEDs shine (a pun) in many areas -and achieves especially high scores with respect to maintenance. While changing bulbs may not be too onerous for homeowners, it is an issue for larger scale operations - say commercial buildings, for example where many thousands of bulbs may be in use - requiring certain manpower. A 50,000 hour lamp vice a 10,000 hour lamp can certainly figure into manpower calcs and ROI. The Hg issue speaks to environmental stewardship - and LEDS provide this bonus without cost or compromise. I happen to love fish - however, I also know that each fish I consume also contributes to the Mercury level I store in my fat. Carbon footprint, etc -- all this adds up. However, just looking at cost of electric energy and luminance efficiency is sufficient to justify the LED alternatives over CFL/Incandescents'HID/Fl Tube, etc.
Use this Bot to calculate your energy savings and identify ROI - I think you will find it compelling. All that other stuff, Mercury/Carbon/Global warming, etc is bonus
http://www.creells.com/calculator.aspx
.