Outlawmws
Well-known member
C is for China...
I like this.![]()
I suppose it's better than the 4 letter "C" word.
(no not that one, the one that doesn't end in "T"... 
C is for China...
I like this.![]()
(no not that one, the one that doesn't end in "T"... 
I suppose it's better than the 4 letter "C" word.(no not that one, the one that doesn't end in "T"...
![]()

Well I guess it's decided. Partsproduction doesn't like the term "lead screw" for the main screw of a vise, and has righteously determined that "clamp screw" is etymologically correct; therefore, we must start using that term, and that term only, from this point forward.
I personally prefer the term "dynamic jaw motion and force inducer."

Wow, 4 month reaction time...
Monarch 204; you sure? I can't find that No. is it possibly 209? stationary or swivel?
Yost and Wilton use the term lead screw for some vises. Examples:
http://www.yostvises.com/PDF/manual/750DIOM.pdf
page 6, part number 13
http://content.jettools.com/assets/manuals/10025_man.pdf
page 7, index number 11
Mostly I see them referred to as main screw, screw, or spindle.
You're right, it is a 402
http://portland.craigslist.org/wsc/tls/5347704341.html

Lastly, getting pedantic on the terminology isn't likely to get you more than finger exercise on GJ.![]()
![]()
The term lead in general means to move a specific distance using a screw thread, for a specific purpose.


Hi guys, recently just cleaned up the inside of a new wilton trademen.
But I was wondering when in actual use, would the dynamic jaw just suddenly fall off if you keep opening the screw, or is there some kind of maximum marker or something to stop it, which I didn't see. If not how do you know if you have opened to the point of almost coming off?
Hey guys, right at the start of this long thread it was mentioned that the little "anvil" spot at the back of some vise bases is not for using as an anvil. So, naturally, I have to ask, what is it for?
I just got my FPU vise, very nice, in NOS condition. The anvil is on the movable jaw. heh heh.
I believe this is because anvils should be forged or hardened.
The typical vise is just cast iron. So beside straightening a nail or aluminum strip , you may chip, indent the anvil or even crack the vise.
Hey guys, right at the start of this long thread it was mentioned that the little "anvil" spot at the back of some vise bases is not for using as an anvil. So, naturally, I have to ask, what is it for?
I just got my FPU vise, very nice, in NOS condition. The anvil is on the movable jaw. heh heh.
Hey guys, right at the start of this long thread it was mentioned that the little "anvil" spot at the back of some vise bases is not for using as an anvil. So, naturally, I have to ask, what is it for?
I just got my FPU vise, very nice, in NOS condition. The anvil is on the movable jaw. heh heh.
whether I want it to or not!I think the vice companies intended them to be used so the vice would eventually break and then you would have to buy another, if they are not abused a good vice just doesn't wear out, one could last 50 years of constant daily use easily if kept clean and oiled.
. . . DO NOT HAMMER ON A MACHINIST VISE! THERE IS NO ANVIL AREA. AND YOU WILL RUIN THE SLIDE, OR CHIP THE BACKI have a Charles Parker vise made in 1906, with 8" wide jaws. It is so heavy I cannot pick it up by myself (feels as if it is way over 100 lbs.). Takes two guys to carry it. Anyway, it has an anvil on it, so does that mean it is not a machinists vise and therefore is made of cast iron not ductile iron.
Thank you for your time.
You have a magnificent vise. But even though it is a good quality heavy vise it does not "really" have an anvil. If you need to beat on something get yourself a real anvil or, as I have, a length of railroad track. Your vise anvil is good for light duty only. Your Parker is cast but I don't know if it is cast iron or cast steel. Others may be able to answer that.
Sent from my LG-D801 using Tapatalk
Ok dude, here is the information on the vise: exactly to the letter what is written on both sides of the vise:
Side 1
The Chas Parker Co.
Oo
Meridan Ct. USA
Side 2
Semi Stee
Solid Bar
Pat. Jan 2, 1906
No. 79 1/2x
Btw, the word stee is not a typo, that is what it literally says. I thought for sure there should be a letter L on the end of that word, but no, it is not there. I looked close and it wasn't ever there, no grind mark. It was forged that way. I wonder why or what happened back then ? perhaps it moved during the id labeling stamping process -- maybe its the only one that happened to. I cant seem to find anything like it on the web, so, if you know anything send a reply, I'll check back from time to time . . . has 8" wide jaws, does not swivel. I could barely turn it over to read the markings, has to be well over 200 lbs. The closest photo I can find is a model called the Eclipse. But that one is marked a 958, and the part that the handle goes thru is pipe shaped, whereas the one I have is a large round ball shape. The vise is Red color.
I came close to finding it on this page:
> http://scuttle.dayid.org/wiki/index.php/Charles_Parker_Vise <
. . . but there is no 79 12/X . . . wth?
Also wonder what the big zero and small zero means?
bye for now
a Parker like you are now describing is more like this:
![]()
here's my oddball vise I just finished sprucing up. it's a reed 103 1/2 s. never seen one like it and I'm under the impression that all 100 series reeds were fixed base, the 200 were swivel. just picked this up at an auction last week. has smooth tool steel jaws and a pretty tight screw. it was missing the pivot bolt and one of the swivel lock assemblies but I was able to re-create those easily enough. overall I got a VERY usable, quality vice and now it looks good as well.
-Scott