Joe87MonteSS
Member
So my wife and I have had several deaths in our families, and as a result my wife inherited her moms house. It is paid for, and is in a decent neighborhood. The problem is that there is no garage. Whatever detached garage there was has been converted into a large den probably back in the 50's, and added on to the house. (Based on historical imagery)
So here is my dilemma. The house is on a corner lot. There is limited space on the driveway side. I have gone to city hall and talked with a planner, and gotten a general idea of what I can do. I would just like some input/opinions.
Here is the property. (Satellite image)
My plan is to build on the right side of the house (corner street side). However, City code says that if the garage is attached, it has to be 15 feet from the north property line. (The fence in the top of the photo.) Also 30 feet from the sidewalk on both sides. Using those setback limitations, I believe I can fit a 16x30 over there.
If I did this plan A, I would have to move a gas meter, move an AC unit, I would lose two bedroom windows, and then there are the roof leak issues that would arise with this sort of addition. The other main factor is cost. I would probably have to use wood frame, etc. The entrance would also be to the rear, which would be very tight for a long car or truck. My 87 Monte Carlo SS is about 17.5 feet long, and my 2004 Silverado is 19 ft. long. I also have a boat/trailer that I would like inside as well. This Plan A is my last option.
Plan B is my second choice. I can request a variance with the Board of Adjustment. The variance would be to build past the 30 foot setback on the East side of the property. (Right side in photo) However much I would need to fit.
This would be detached. The requirements for a detached garage are the same 30 foot setbacks, but will be 5 feet from the north line. Also it has to be 10 feet from the house.
Plan C would be my first choice, and the absolute maximum that I could fit on the property. This is roughly the same as Plan B, but with more garage space. The difference being the driveway space would just be garage space. I would be able to put my car, my boat, and hopefully a lift in there. It could be a 24x40 depending on what I get approved for with the variance.
Plans B and C will be for a steel building. The only problem is that it has to match the house. Which would mean that I either side the house to match the building, or side the building to match the house.
The house is, I think, cypress board and batten and brick.
To request a variance would cost 150 for the application fee. I would also have to have some plans drafted up, and the land surveyed. Also a bunch of other legal junk. The planner did say that there is a good chance that the variance would be approved based on the hardships of the property layout, and since the past garage was converted. Not to mention the setbacks in the plat were from 1952 when the place was built.
Actual location of doors/windows of the garage are TBD. The white is planned driveway additions.
The steel buildings are assembled on site, include slab, and insulation. Electrical, CAT5, etc will come at a later date.
Any questions or clarifications, just ask. She really doesn't want to sell the house as its sentimental. She said that I could do whatever I want for a garage as long as I stop whining about it. Lol.
Sorry for the long post. I really would like some opinions. I'm probably over thinking all of this. But it really is stressing me out.
Thanks for looking! Please excuse the paint drawings. It's the best I could do so I could actually see something laid out. Of course, things are not to scale.
So here is my dilemma. The house is on a corner lot. There is limited space on the driveway side. I have gone to city hall and talked with a planner, and gotten a general idea of what I can do. I would just like some input/opinions.
Here is the property. (Satellite image)
My plan is to build on the right side of the house (corner street side). However, City code says that if the garage is attached, it has to be 15 feet from the north property line. (The fence in the top of the photo.) Also 30 feet from the sidewalk on both sides. Using those setback limitations, I believe I can fit a 16x30 over there.
If I did this plan A, I would have to move a gas meter, move an AC unit, I would lose two bedroom windows, and then there are the roof leak issues that would arise with this sort of addition. The other main factor is cost. I would probably have to use wood frame, etc. The entrance would also be to the rear, which would be very tight for a long car or truck. My 87 Monte Carlo SS is about 17.5 feet long, and my 2004 Silverado is 19 ft. long. I also have a boat/trailer that I would like inside as well. This Plan A is my last option.
Plan B is my second choice. I can request a variance with the Board of Adjustment. The variance would be to build past the 30 foot setback on the East side of the property. (Right side in photo) However much I would need to fit.
This would be detached. The requirements for a detached garage are the same 30 foot setbacks, but will be 5 feet from the north line. Also it has to be 10 feet from the house.
Plan C would be my first choice, and the absolute maximum that I could fit on the property. This is roughly the same as Plan B, but with more garage space. The difference being the driveway space would just be garage space. I would be able to put my car, my boat, and hopefully a lift in there. It could be a 24x40 depending on what I get approved for with the variance.
Plans B and C will be for a steel building. The only problem is that it has to match the house. Which would mean that I either side the house to match the building, or side the building to match the house.
The house is, I think, cypress board and batten and brick.
To request a variance would cost 150 for the application fee. I would also have to have some plans drafted up, and the land surveyed. Also a bunch of other legal junk. The planner did say that there is a good chance that the variance would be approved based on the hardships of the property layout, and since the past garage was converted. Not to mention the setbacks in the plat were from 1952 when the place was built.
Actual location of doors/windows of the garage are TBD. The white is planned driveway additions.
The steel buildings are assembled on site, include slab, and insulation. Electrical, CAT5, etc will come at a later date.
Any questions or clarifications, just ask. She really doesn't want to sell the house as its sentimental. She said that I could do whatever I want for a garage as long as I stop whining about it. Lol.
Sorry for the long post. I really would like some opinions. I'm probably over thinking all of this. But it really is stressing me out.
Thanks for looking! Please excuse the paint drawings. It's the best I could do so I could actually see something laid out. Of course, things are not to scale.
