To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Genuine Snap on cart?

RLRRLRLL

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
1,089
Location
Spearville Kansas
sounds like a mac fan boy.....my pc with vista does fine..i know a girl that buys a new mac every year becouse they are trendy..and it seems she always is doing somthing to it becouse somthing failed. but..she will pay for the name. i myself do not own many snap on tools, but i can definatly tell the difference in quailty between crapsman and snap on. snap on wins.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

ToolDude

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
21
Apple computers are just like any if you look at the real facts and stop being a "fan boy" for two seconds . They will simply perform exactly the same tasks as "windows" based computers. You need to remember that I probably have a few more macs than you. I have everything from Mac mini's to Mac Pros. Saying that they are "better" is laughable" at best. A "better" unit is a unit that can do something it's competitor cannot. I'm fairly certain any PC in MY home can run aperture and photoshop CS4 just fine without any hiccups. If you want to talk about mac mini's they are NOTHING in comparison of what you could buy as far as speed, etc is concerned.

Sheer ignorance is about the only way I can describe what you just said. Utterly sheer ignorance.

First of all, aesthetics are quite important to a lot of people, and Apple wins that contest hands-down. There is absolutely no comparison.

Secondly, Aperture is an Apple product, and doesn't run on a Windows PC. So that right there tells me you have no idea what you're talking about.

CS4 can run on either a Mac or a Windows PC, but the problem with running it on the Windows PC is that RAM is scarce, due to all the nonsense background programs Windows has running.

Apple is more compatible with high-tech devices than are Windows PCs, at least that was true until Windows 7, which I think is awesome, BTW.

Macs boot-up faster. This has been tested by every tech magazine under the sun, and Mac wins out every time.

You may spend more money for your Macintosh, but all in all, you'll spend less money, because Windows PCs break down more often and if you can't repair it yourself, you'll have to pay someone to repair it. Not to mention all the software you'll have to buy. This is due to increased security risks and an awful filing system.

OSX comes with the best free software package of any OS, period.

And I doubt you own more Macs than me. I have 10 right now. Some new, some old. I have three Windows PCs, one of which running Windows 7, which is one of the best systems I've used.

As far as your security comment goes...ANY computer can be secure if you as a human aren't being malicious. Sure apple products do in fact stop risks a "bit" easier, but saying that a windows based machine doesn't is absurd.

I never said Windows machines can't stop or prevent security issues; I just said Mac does it better, and they do.
Also, having a unit "look" better is a little asinine. Just because something is aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean it's better. That's where your comments start to hold zero ground.

Where did I say because the Macs look better that means they are better? It seems you have some comprehension problems. Best see a doctor.

As for the rest of your post, I don't care, as my last post mentioned. You can love, adore, or take your Snap-On tools out to dinner, but right now, it's not been proven to me that Snap-On is better. I am going to buy some and see what I think. You mentioned a ratchet, one I hadn't used before. I'll check it out and we'll see.
 
Last edited:

atari

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
555
Location
Carroll, Ohio
Wow, that was awesome......or something. :headscrat

Well anyway its a really nice cart, you know the one the thread was started for?
 

Blwnsln

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
350
an old time wrencher I work with has this cart, its actully pretty sturdy and has some cool featues, such as the top that slides open, and it has some space for ods and ends on the bottom sides. Hes had it for a long time and its heald up to quite a bit of abuse. Ill try and get some pics tommorw.
 

ToolDude

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
21
Frankly, I'm done with this thread. If I insulted anyone by "bashing" Snap-On, I apologize. I'm going to buy some, see what I think, and maybe the next time some netizen comes here and downs Snap-On, I'll go nuts on them.

You can hope, right?
 

RLRRLRLL

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
1,089
Location
Spearville Kansas
tooldude, back when i wasent crazy about tools i always thought snap on was just hype. Until i used them. At the shop i usally used the tray that me and my boss both would work out of, which were his tools. the other mechanic had a 40" snap on combo filled with tools. And when i had to..id use his...then it got to where...when i was there by myself i would just use his tools haha. They are really nice tools, fit better them most on fastners, and just feel good. The last time i tried to use my sisters mac laptop i couldent even figure out how to use the net on it. I just prefer to use my pc other then hers as its simpler.
 

07Forester

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
549
Location
Elburn, IL
Sheer ignorance is about the only way I can describe what you just said. Utterly sheer ignorance.

First of all, aesthetics are quite important to a lot of people, and Apple wins that contest hands-down. There is absolutely no comparison.

Secondly, Aperture is an Apple product, and doesn't run on a Windows PC. So that right there tells me you have no idea what you're talking about.

CS4 can run on either a Mac or a Windows PC, but the problem with running it on the Windows PC is that RAM is scarce, due to all the nonsense background programs Windows has running.

Apple is more compatible with high-tech devices than are Windows PCs, at least that was true until Windows 7, which I think is awesome, BTW.

Macs boot-up faster. This has been tested by every tech magazine under the sun, and Mac wins out every time.

You may spend more money for your Macintosh, but all in all, you'll spend less money, because Windows PCs break down more often and if you can't repair it yourself, you'll have to pay someone to repair it. Not to mention all the software you'll have to buy. This is due to increased security risks and an awful filing system.

OSX comes with the best free software package of any OS, period.

And I doubt you own more Macs than me. I have 10 right now. Some new, some old. I have three Windows PCs, one of which running Windows 7, which is one of the best systems I've used.



I never said Windows machines can't stop or prevent security issues; I just said Mac does it better, and they do.


Where did I say because the Macs look better that means they are better? It seems you have some comprehension problems. Best see a doctor.

As for the rest of your post, I don't care, as my last post mentioned. You can love, adore, or take your Snap-On tools out to dinner, but right now, it's not been proven to me that Snap-On is better. I am going to buy some and see what I think. You mentioned a ratchet, one I hadn't used before. I'll check it out and we'll see.

Mind you anything in this post is reflecting your now complete

Alright well. Here we go. This is my last reply to you as your reading comprehension is obviously non existent. That...or you REALLY don't know what YOU'RE talking about.

In a post earlier I stated that I do have a WINDOWS based machine. Correct? In that same post I ALSO said I have OSX RUNNING on my "windows" based machine. Correct? Obviously you AREN'T as much of a fanboy as I thought because if you were you would know all about OSX86.

Since you're not in the know I will just explain in ways that you MAY understand. No promises though. OSX86 works quite similar to the way that bootcamp runs on apple machines. Aperture is NOT supported NOR is it really "legal" to run aperture the way I am. I'm betting you're asking yourself "why does he do it then"? Simply put....because I can.

Now lets talk about your zero lack of knowledge on windows based machines. Again, you're losing valued credit with every word you type.

You say CS4 runs better on apple machines because RAM is scarce in windows. You also say that windows has a lot of "nonsense" programs running in the background. So, which are these "programs" that you speak of exactly? I would assume that you're talking about programs that are kept handy due to "frequent" use, therefore explaining why the memory is being eaten up. Which ODDLY enough is the SAME exact thing that apple computers do. They MAY go about it in a DIFFERENT way, but it is the SAME exact thing. Not to mention, being such a "power user", you would know you can disable these features as well as the "backgrounded" programs.

This is one I especially like. "Apple is more compatible with high-tech devices". Dude. Are you REALLY believing the ******** you're sprouting about? Apple computers RECOGNIZE more devices off of the fly. Sure, windows can do the same thing 95% of the time. However, on EITHER machine it is RECOMMENDED that you STILL install "correct" drivers for it.

You saying that apples boot up times are faster is kind of....well....retarded. Also, what magazines are these again? I will make you a bet. My fastest Mac Pro (8 core 2.66, 16gigs of ram, SS drives) against my windows based (AMD 6 core, 16gig of ram, SS drives). I already know the winner as i've (as accurately as I can) timed them myself. Apple loses.

Why would you even claim that you would HAVE to take a PC to get "repaired" Any 3rd grader can take-apart a PC and put it back together. APPLE products ARE less friendly to mods, upgrades, etc.

I will give you the fact that windows units DO have **** filing systems. However if you know what raid is...there goes the point again. Right out the window.

As far as the "pre-packaged" software. To me that means NOTHING. To someone who BUYS PCs...maybe. But I doubt it. There is STILL a LOT of **** you have to buy for apple. Don't say that it isn't the truth because you know damn well that it is.

Yeah, I would doubt yourself that you own more macs than me. I have a total of 3 mac pro's, 3 mac book pros, 5 27" imacs, and 7 mac minis. 4 of which are running in VEHICLES. Lets also not forget about the 9 windows based machines I run.

Your comment in a previous post was that in aesthetics "mac looks better". Hence why I said what I said. People don't buy things because of HOW it looks until you get into "custom" computing. People like you and millions JUST like you are buying apple computers because what's ON the side of the box. An apple logo. Once again i'll say that respectfully you and I BOTH paid WAYYYY too much for.

As I said earlier this is my last reply to you. Actually, it's my last reply until you can stop talking out of your ***. You think you know everything there is to know about apple products and you're wrong. Just a pissed off dude because someone is slamming apple.

Your points are in complete left field and you need to take a hard look that someone knows more knowledge than you. Once you see that, I would assume your foot would be in your mouth more often.

Like it is now.
 

ToolDude

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
21
In a post earlier I stated that I do have a WINDOWS based machine. Correct? In that same post I ALSO said I have OSX RUNNING on my "windows" based machine. Correct? Obviously you AREN'T as much of a fanboy as I thought because if you were you would know all about OSX86.

I'm quite aware of OSx86. It's completely illegal, as you mentioned, but it's also junk, which you forgot to mention. There is a plethora of problems with Hackintosh computers, but given your limited knowledge thus far of, well, anything computer related, it doesn't surprise me you haven't figured this immutable fact out yet.

You say CS4 runs better on apple machines because RAM is scarce in windows. You also say that windows has a lot of "nonsense" programs running in the background. So, which are these "programs" that you speak of exactly? I would assume that you're talking about programs that are kept handy due to "frequent" use, therefore explaining why the memory is being eaten up. Which ODDLY enough is the SAME exact thing that apple computers do. They MAY go about it in a DIFFERENT way, but it is the SAME exact thing. Not to mention, being such a "power user", you would know you can disable these features as well as the "backgrounded" programs.

First of all, you simply cannot disable every background program running, because many are required. It's not about user programs so much as a failure on Windows' part to manage memory properly, i.e., not filling up the cache, et cetera...

Furthermore, there is absolutely no doubt that Windows comes PRELOADED with a bunch of NONSENSE PROGRAMS that many users simply don't know how to disable, assuming one hasn't built their own machine. (So not only are Mac machines better as far as performance and aesthetics go, but the usability is there for anyone with a brain stem that is not a computer whiz, sorta like you. Do you have a brain stem?) Macintosh does not do the same thing, so you yet again display sheer ignorance. You attempt to hide this fact by casually including, "They MAY go about it in a DIFFERENT way..." I'm not even sure what that means, unless you're admitting that OSX manages memory better than Windows, which you'd be correct - for once.

This is one I especially like. "Apple is more compatible with high-tech devices". Dude. Are you REALLY believing the ******** you're sprouting about? Apple computers RECOGNIZE more devices off of the fly. Sure, windows can do the same thing 95% of the time. However, on EITHER machine it is RECOMMENDED that you STILL install "correct" drivers for it.

You just admitted that Apple is more compatible with more devices right off the bat. You literally just admitted it, and you attempt to dismiss this by falsely claiming that Windows does this "95% of the time," which is patently false. Windows 7 does a decent job, but certainly no comparison to Macintosh. And Apple typically has the correct drivers right off the bat, because if they weren't correct, warning messages would consume your screen, which you also forgot to mention.

You saying that apples boot up times are faster is kind of....well....retarded.

Kinda like everything you've said thus far, no?

Also, what magazines are these again? I will make you a bet. My fastest Mac Pro (8 core 2.66, 16gigs of ram, SS drives) against my windows based (AMD 6 core, 16gig of ram, SS drives). I already know the winner as i've (as accurately as I can) timed them myself. Apple loses.

Popular Mechanics

Average Start-Up Time For A 2.4GHz iMac with 1GB DDR2 RAM - 28.7s.

Shutdown - 4s.

Average Start-Up Time For A 2.0GHz Gateway One with 3GB DDR2 RAM - 1 min, 13s.

Shutdown - 44s.

Please note that all across the board, the iMac launches programs quicker too, including Adobe programs such as Photoshop CS4.

This is just one magazine, of course, but I could link you to about 30 more. Also notice how Mac fires up Windows programs faster, such as Microsoft Office. Sorta makes you wonder about the different architectures, huh?

Why would you even claim that you would HAVE to take a PC to get "repaired" Any 3rd grader can take-apart a PC and put it back together. APPLE products ARE less friendly to mods, upgrades, etc.

Why do you imagine people like GeekSquad and your local PC repair shop stay in business? Because not everyone can fix their own machines, just like not everyone can fix their own car or remodel their own home, or rewire their own house, or snake-out their sewer. I can't believe you'd make such an asinine statement and actually believe it holds any water - at all.

I will give you the fact that windows units DO have **** filing systems. However if you know what raid is...there goes the point again. Right out the window.

Ridiculous. Spend extra money and hire someone to do it for you (knowing, of course, that not everyone can do this, regardless of your asinine contention otherwise) for something not needed with a Macintosh.

Let's not even get into the plethora of potential problems with such a set-up.

As far as the "pre-packaged" software. To me that means NOTHING. To someone who BUYS PCs...maybe. But I doubt it. There is STILL a LOT of **** you have to buy for apple. Don't say that it isn't the truth because you know damn well that it is.

Like what? You can get by without an anti-virus software, though I don't recommend it. You simply don't need any special disk utilities, though if you wanted something better than what's installed, Apple Scripts are available for download, free of charge, which combine all necessary maintenance tools into one executable file. Simple, easy, and free.

Yeah, I would doubt yourself that you own more macs than me. I have a total of 3 mac pro's, 3 mac book pros, 5 27" imacs, and 7 mac minis. 4 of which are running in VEHICLES. Lets also not forget about the 9 windows based machines I run.

This doesn't mean anything anyway. Have to wonder why you buy so many Macs while knowing absolutely nothing about them.

Your comment in a previous post was that in aesthetics "mac looks better". Hence why I said what I said. People don't buy things because of HOW it looks until you get into "custom" computing. People like you and millions JUST like you are buying apple computers because what's ON the side of the box. An apple logo. Once again i'll say that respectfully you and I BOTH paid WAYYYY too much for.

Why not buy a powerful, stylish machine that out performs Windows? I didn't pay too much for mine, notwithstanding your comments.

As I said earlier this is my last reply to you. Actually, it's my last reply until you can stop talking out of your ***. You think you know everything there is to know about apple products and you're wrong. Just a pissed off dude because someone is slamming apple.

Want to see someone talking out of their ***? Look in the mirror, buddy. Not only did you contradict yourself, but you were proven wrong via Popular Mechanics, common sense, and fact. Not to mention that you're an admitted thief, owning a Hackintosh.

You were owned because you're a ***** who knows absolutely nothing about filing systems, security, system architectures, memory management, and common sense. You make asinine assumptions, like anyone can repair their own PC, which is quite obviously false. For the day-to-day user, Macintosh is better. For the photographer/digital artist, Macintosh is better. For the gamer, Windows has it right now, but that won't always be the case.

I'm not replying to you anymore, and in fact you've been ignored, because you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, notwithstanding your declarations to the contrary.
 
Last edited:

WSMC633

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
484
Location
Los Angeles, CA
This thread is hilarious.

I love my Macs, haven't owned a Windows based machine in years. God willing it will stay that way. With that said, it's just a tool. Designed to make your life easier. If Windows 7 does it for you, awesome. A Mac does it for me. Furthermore, I just can't see why anyone would really care what somebody else was using for a computer. Who cares what it cost. I paid for it, not you!

My CMAN experiences of Joy:
I have 3 sets of CMan T-Handle Hex's that are worthless. They're T-Handle Round stock now. I think they're made out of wax. They last a couple months then they're trash.

10mm CMAN wrench that either the open end was spreading or it was simply not sized properly. slipped right of the bolt.

8mm Wrench.... More like a 7.5mm on the box end....
Countless crappy stripped ratchets,
3/8 torque wrench that lasted about 14 months... no warranty on that bad boy.
Hex Bit sockets... Also made out of Wax and I just love how they constantly fall out of the bit holder. Great design there.
Screwdrivers... Poor to mediocre
Flare nut wrenches... laughable.Unless you like round nuts.

Snap-On Comparison:
T-Handle hex's - 10x more use. Still are perfect.
Never had a wrench that didn't fit perfect.
Zero Stripped ratchets
1/4" torque wrench, ratchet got messed up, fixed zero questions asked. Been perfect ever since, as are the other 2
Bit sockets, lasting great and have yet to fall apart.
Line Wrenches, have taken every old rusty, disgusting nut off no problems.


But as said in the thread before, they're just tools. Everyone gets different mileage out of them. If Cman works for you, then great. Rock on! As for me, I've had to many annoying problems for them to be worth the frustration to save a few bucks.

As a Side Note, I grew up using my dad's tools which were 80% CMAN and the Rest SO. The older CMAN was so much better than what they make now.

Oh yeah, cool cart. You should go check it out and see if it will work for you!
 

mrshaun

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
4,033
Location
Killeen - Fort Hood
I only used a mac in school. It does not run our snap on software the way they like it too, so windows it is. oh well. I would like a mac, but my cheap compaq has been going for 6 years and does what I need to. maybe it is time for an upgrade...
can we get back to the CART.
END OF THREAD unless you are talking about the cart. FREE parking is good for computer comments.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Fubar

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
360
Location
Cape Cod Ma
I will say this about this thread, and the SO argument. Saying that you hate a particular brand (that's widely accepted as being the best) that you admittedly say you have none of, Just because you're sick of what people say about them (and having such conviction about it) just smacks of being young, and inexperienced. Hopefully you'll grow out of that.

Case in point: I've been doing this for 30 odd years, and last year I had a local guy come into my shop looking for parts. He's about 25, and has been building up older cars (something I've done for years) and has has some success at it. Looking at one of my open drawers as someone else makes a comment about the Snap-on stuff, he states: " That's nothing, I'll have all that and more in two years". Smiling, I ask him if he has any idea of what he is looking at. He says " No problem, I'll just get all that stuff from the store, it's just as good" (his father owns a True-Value hardware store) For what he does, that stuff works for him so it was all the same. I just smiled again and wished him luck with that....I see some of that here.

For many people, the other brands with work just fine for what they do. And it isn't worth the extra expense for them, especially if they are not in the trade. but as many will tell you here, using them hard every day there is nothing that works better than Snap-On.

This is the drawer that the kid commented on.....

Toolbox006.jpg
 

07Forester

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
549
Location
Elburn, IL
I'm quite aware of OSx86. It's completely illegal, as you mentioned, but it's also junk, which you forgot to mention. There is a plethora of problems with Hackintosh computers, but given your limited knowledge thus far of, well, anything computer related, it doesn't surprise me you haven't figured this immutable fact out yet.



First of all, you simply cannot disable every background program running, because many are required. It's not about user programs so much as a failure on Windows' part to manage memory properly, i.e., not filling up the cache, et cetera...

Furthermore, there is absolutely no doubt that Windows comes PRELOADED with a bunch of NONSENSE PROGRAMS that many users simply don't know how to disable, assuming one hasn't built their own machine. (So not only are Mac machines better as far as performance and aesthetics go, but the usability is there for anyone with a brain stem that is not a computer whiz, sorta like you. Do you have a brain stem?) Macintosh does not do the same thing, so you yet again display sheer ignorance. You attempt to hide this fact by casually including, "They MAY go about it in a DIFFERENT way..." I'm not even sure what that means, unless you're admitting that OSX manages memory better than Windows, which you'd be correct - for once.



You just admitted that Apple is more compatible with more devices right off the bat. You literally just admitted it, and you attempt to dismiss this by falsely claiming that Windows does this "95% of the time," which is patently false. Windows 7 does a decent job, but certainly no comparison to Macintosh. And Apple typically has the correct drivers right off the bat, because if they weren't correct, warning messages would consume your screen, which you also forgot to mention.



Kinda like everything you've said thus far, no?



Popular Mechanics

Average Start-Up Time For A 2.4GHz iMac with 1GB DDR2 RAM - 28.7s.

Shutdown - 4s.

Average Start-Up Time For A 2.0GHz Gateway One with 3GB DDR2 RAM - 1 min, 13s.

Shutdown - 44s.

Please note that all across the board, the iMac launches programs quicker too, including Adobe programs such as Photoshop CS4.

This is just one magazine, of course, but I could link you to about 30 more. Also notice how Mac fires up Windows programs faster, such as Microsoft Office. Sorta makes you wonder about the different architectures, huh?



Why do you imagine people like GeekSquad and your local PC repair shop stay in business? Because not everyone can fix their own machines, just like not everyone can fix their own car or remodel their own home, or rewire their own house, or snake-out their sewer. I can't believe you'd make such an asinine statement and actually believe it holds any water - at all.



Ridiculous. Spend extra money and hire someone to do it for you (knowing, of course, that not everyone can do this, regardless of your asinine contention otherwise) for something not needed with a Macintosh.

Let's not even get into the plethora of potential problems with such a set-up.



Like what? You can get by without an anti-virus software, though I don't recommend it. You simply don't need any special disk utilities, though if you wanted something better than what's installed, Apple Scripts are available for download, free of charge, which combine all necessary maintenance tools into one executable file. Simple, easy, and free.



This doesn't mean anything anyway. Have to wonder why you buy so many Macs while knowing absolutely nothing about them.



Why not buy a powerful, stylish machine that out performs Windows? I didn't pay too much for mine, notwithstanding your comments.



Want to see someone talking out of their ***? Look in the mirror, buddy. Not only did you contradict yourself, but you were proven wrong via Popular Mechanics, common sense, and fact. Not to mention that you're an admitted thief, owning a Hackintosh.

You were owned because you're a ***** who knows absolutely nothing about filing systems, security, system architectures, memory management, and common sense. You make asinine assumptions, like anyone can repair their own PC, which is quite obviously false. For the day-to-day user, Macintosh is better. For the photographer/digital artist, Macintosh is better. For the gamer, Windows has it right now, but that won't always be the case.

I'm not replying to you anymore, and in fact you've been ignored, because you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, notwithstanding your declarations to the contrary.


You obviously didn't get it the first time, and you obviously don't get it now. I'm not talking about macs in general. I'm talking about them in my personal experience. Like I said, arguing with you is like a lot of the comparisons you make. Retarded. I'll let your troll-ness be.
 

Mark Thomseth

New member
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Messages
1
Saw this on craigslist. When did Snap on make this? Is it real?
I bought one brand new , it’s is a real snap on tool box , I am currently selling it on Craigslist at this time , it’s not a case for a tool or scanner, it is a rolling tool box
 

bobg03

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
3,420
Location
conway sc
this was on a craftsman drill and it was the bit that came with the set from a few years back. I do not use my snap on drill out in the mud where the swing set was. I keep it nice and clean in the garage.
That's like not sleeping with your girl, cause you want her tight and fresh for the next guy..:D
 

walrus

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
11,675
Location
Maine
Awesome, 2010 thread brought back up. It was a good read, some fan boy of Apple whining about Fan Boys of Snap on, couldn't get much better :)
 

kody1234

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
67
man I am glad I do not feel the same way as you do TOOLDUDE. might be bad for business.......
If a tool works, then use it. If it does not and a " name brand " company makes one that does, then use that one.
just get a sgdp42irbr and start with that.
It works when many other fail. I demonstrated that to my self tuesday taking apart an old swing set. the no name bit in my cordless drill kept slipping. Pulled out the snap on #2 with the ACR tip and wow it did not slip and came right out. Imagine that...
stay off the tool truck i have bought a lot of snap- on at yard sales and ebay for a fraction of the tool truck price.snap-on makes all that money on financing.
 

seber

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,195
Location
Deep East Tx.
That cart was sold by Snap-on, but I'm pretty sure it was made by Rubbermaid. They make a lot of custom things like that. Very sturdy. I have a Rubbermaid two wheel wheelbarrow that was use for concrete for many years before I got it. I also have a Craftsman toolbox that was made by them. It doesn't really fit my needs but it damn sure is solid.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom