To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Gfci

mnpeterg

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2024
Messages
38
Have a Klein outlet tester.
Brand new eaton gfci and afci combo breaker.

I love the tester, for some reason when I press gfci on the tester it doesn’t trip the breaker. But when I push the test button on the breaker itself it does trip.


Is this all normal? Not sure if it would even work with a gfci breaker…
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

rlitman

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
24,584
Location
Long Island
Does the test button trip other GFCI outlets? If so, I would be inclined to think something is wrong with the breaker.
 

RPH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2006
Messages
4,190
Location
Michigan Thumb
Two different devices that trip for different reasons. Arc fault should not trip due to a ground fault. A ground fault shows a difference in the current coming in to the current going out. Any shortage is deemed a ground fault.
 

rlitman

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
24,584
Location
Long Island
Two different devices that trip for different reasons. Arc fault should not trip due to a ground fault. A ground fault shows a difference in the current coming in to the current going out. Any shortage is deemed a ground fault.
Except this is a combination device. A combination AFCI/GFCI should trip when you test with ground fault current.
 
OP
M

mnpeterg

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2024
Messages
38
It is connected to only one item, an outlet. I’m getting a solid 120v.

Pressing the test on the af/gfci breaker, it does pop and remove pwr to the circuit.

The gfci button on the Klein outlet tester doesn’t cause the breaker to trip.

Could it be that these testers only cause an outlet to trip (provided it’s a gfci outlet) and not a gfci circuit breaker?
 
OP
M

mnpeterg

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2024
Messages
38
rt250, crazy thing is ,. this is all brand new (as in today). except the tester. had power company complete the service drop today on a large shed.
 

Gozo

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
249
Location
Central VA
Test the tester in a bathroom outlet closest to the sink. Bathroom outlets have had to be gfci protected for at least 35-40 years.
 
OP
M

mnpeterg

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2024
Messages
38
I dont get an error with the tester, it simply isn’t causing the breaker to pop. the msg on the tester screen is '>6.0.' meaning it is longer than 6 seconds for the overcurrent it’s sending to be effective. I’m hard pressed to think anything is wrong since there is literally nothing hooked into this whole system. brand new service panel, new clean wiring, just very odd since using the actual test button on the (overpriced $58) circuit breaker is working.
 

walta

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2017
Messages
2,309
Location
Dutzow Missouri
Is it possible that the AFCI/GFIC breaker is a class B or C GFIC device that trips at 20 mA of current and the tester is intended for class A GFIC of 5 mA?

My GFIC tester measures 18 k Ohm when the test button is depressed. It would pass 6.1 mA at 110V or 7.1 mA at 128V.

It would be interesting to know the value of the resister in your tester.

Do you have a 5k Ohm resister around that would flow about 22 mA and see it that would trip the combo breaker?

Walta
 
Last edited:

BrandonV

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
4,030
Location
Arizona
Is it possible that the AFCI/GFIC breaker is a class B or C GFIC device that trips at 20 mA of current and the tester is intended for class A GFIC of 5 mA?

My GFIC tester measures 18 k Ohm when the test button is depressed. It would pass 6.1 mA at 110V or 7.1 mA at 128V.

It would be interesting to know the value of the resister in your tester.

Do you have a 5k Ohm resister around that would flow about 22 mA and see it that would trip the combo breaker?

Walta

I'd be curious as well with a photo of the breaker to look at the model number.

I would suggest if you plan on going down the route of the resistor you only connect it for a fraction of a second or the resistor is going to melt if the GFI fails to trip.
 
Last edited:
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

wyliesdiesels

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
19,994
Location
Modesto, CA
I dont get an error with the tester, it simply isn’t causing the breaker to pop. the msg on the tester screen is '>6.0.' meaning it is longer than 6 seconds for the overcurrent it’s sending to be effective. I’m hard pressed to think anything is wrong since there is literally nothing hooked into this whole system. brand new service panel, new clean wiring, just very odd since using the actual test button on the (overpriced $58) circuit breaker is working.
youre mixing things up here. a GFCI is not an OCPD- overcurrent protective device. its a ground fault protective device.

The GFCI tester should be leaking 5ma or more to the ground wire to cause the GFCI portion of the breaker to trip.

If the tester instead is trying to overload test the breaker, by pulling more current than the trip curve rating of the breaker, then perhaps its not pulling enough.

but ground fault and overcurrent are 2 entirely different things here.
 

BrandonV

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Messages
4,030
Location
Arizona
Sounds like he might be using the Klein RT390? On the GFI test I think it will send 6 to 9mA of current over a 6 second period to record the current & time required for the GFI to trip.

Not sure why anything would be a 20 mA GFI for a typical branch circuit. Pretty sure NEC requires class A for everything these days regarding personal protection.

OP there is a 30mA button that can be used to trip a less sensitive GFI... not sure why you would have one in a home... but it's there.
 
Last edited:

Norcal

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
13,752
From what I understand the only UL sanctioned test is the button on the device, so failing to trip with a test device is not a defect.
 

sparky 1971

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2018
Messages
7,967
Location
Central Iowa
From what I understand the only UL sanctioned test is the button on the device, so failing to trip with a test device is not a defect.
I have actually been shown that in the UL White Book. Not that I actually cared, but it came up during a discussion about home inspectors and service calls "defective" GFCI's installed in old houses with no ground that won't trip.
 

Jack Ryan

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
339
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
As a matter of (perhaps) interest, In Australia, the UK and some other places, RCCBs/GFCIs trip at 30mA. Plug-in testers usually create a ground fault current of 35mA.

Jack
 

wyliesdiesels

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
19,994
Location
Modesto, CA
As a matter of (perhaps) interest, In Australia, the UK and some other places, RCCBs/GFCIs trip at 30mA. Plug-in testers usually create a ground fault current of 35mA.

Jack
but the GFCIs you have there are on the main service correct? if so then its for equipment protection not person protection.

we have large services here in the US that have main disconnects with GFCI protection. the reason is these services are 480v with massive amounts of available fault current. a ground fault would be catastrophic for the building/equipment...

30ma is too much to let thru the human body and can definitely screw up the heart. hence why class A GFCIs are 5ma
 

Jack Ryan

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
339
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
but the GFCIs you have there are on the main service correct? if so then its for equipment protection not person protection.

we have large services here in the US that have main disconnects with GFCI protection. the reason is these services are 480v with massive amounts of available fault current. a ground fault would be catastrophic for the building/equipment...

30ma is too much to let thru the human body and can definitely screw up the heart. hence why class A GFCIs are 5ma
I don't think any RCDs are for the protection of equipment. These are installed for personal and perhaps fire protection.

There is, or at least was, a single RCD mounted on the CB panel following the main switch. There are now also combined CB and RCDs for each circuit - still at 30mA. AFCBs are also used.

Jack
 

dscheidt

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 26, 2017
Messages
2,888
I don't think any RCDs are for the protection of equipment. These are installed for personal and perhaps fire protection.
fire prevention would be protection of equipment. For protecting a service, the limit has to be higher, because it's not uncommon to have a 1 mA fault current on a device, and handful of such devices would trip a 5 mA RCD/GFCI, which is annoying.

30 mA at 240V is enough to kill, so it's not really suitable for life safety. It should prevent gross shocks (like dropping the hair dryer in the bathtub, or sticking a fork into a light socket), but there are plenty of ways to have 20 mA or so of leakage, which can be fatal, and won't trip a 30 mA RCD.
 

Jack Ryan

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
339
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
fire prevention would be protection of equipment. For protecting a service, the limit has to be higher, because it's not uncommon to have a 1 mA fault current on a device, and handful of such devices would trip a 5 mA RCD/GFCI, which is annoying.

30 mA at 240V is enough to kill, so it's not really suitable for life safety. It should prevent gross shocks (like dropping the hair dryer in the bathtub, or sticking a fork into a light socket), but there are plenty of ways to have 20 mA or so of leakage, which can be fatal, and won't trip a 30 mA RCD.

So, what should I do? Recall all the wiring regs and standards?

Some excerpts from the relevant wiring regs (AS/NZS 3000):

  • The use of fixed setting RCDs with a rated operating residual current not exceeding 30 mA is recognized as providing additional protection in areas where excessive earth leakage current in the event of failure of other measures of protection or carelessness by users could present a significant risk of electric shock.
  • RCDs with a sensitivity of 30 mA are designed to operate before fibrillation of the heart occurs.
Lower leakage currents can be used, the maximum is 30mA. That is also the most common and is the default used in most installations.

Prevention of fire, by the way, is to protect people from building fires, not to protect the equipment.

Jack
 

wyliesdiesels

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
19,994
Location
Modesto, CA
fire prevention would be protection of equipment. For protecting a service, the limit has to be higher, because it's not uncommon to have a 1 mA fault current on a device, and handful of such devices would trip a 5 mA RCD/GFCI, which is annoying.

30 mA at 240V is enough to kill, so it's not really suitable for life safety. It should prevent gross shocks (like dropping the hair dryer in the bathtub, or sticking a fork into a light socket), but there are plenty of ways to have 20 mA or so of leakage, which can be fatal, and won't trip a 30 mA RCD.
this would not trip a GFCI unless the drain tail on the tub was metallic and the plumbing was bonded (drain lines are typically never bonded)

as to the light socket scenario, im not sure how that would cause a ground fault since light sockets do not have a ground terminal inside the socket.
 

Jack Ryan

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
339
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
this would not trip a GFCI unless the drain tail on the tub was metallic and the plumbing was bonded (drain lines are typically never bonded)

as to the light socket scenario, im not sure how that would cause a ground fault since light sockets do not have a ground terminal inside the socket.
Dropping an unprotected (no RCD) hair dryer into the bath is not smart, but it probably won't kill you. I might if you lift the wet drier out of the water. In that case, an RCD would help.

Sticking a fork in a light socket is not a smart thing to do either, especially if standing on a damp floor or touching a bonded or grounded tap. Again, an RCD would help.

In general, RCDs, AFCIs, CBs and similar devices are there to stop people getting electric shocks, prevent buildings from catching fire and to stop people from dying in fires caused by electrical faults - not to protect the cable and the equipment.

NFPA 70

National Electrical Code

Enforced in all 50 states, NFPA 70, National Electrical Code (NEC) is the benchmark for safe electrical design, installation, and inspection to protect people and property from electrical hazards.

Jack

 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom