alfredeneuman
Well-known member
Home inspectors rarely know what they are talking about and their weakest subject is electrical.Home inspectors don't always know what they are talking about
Last edited:
Home inspectors rarely know what they are talking about and their weakest subject is electrical.Home inspectors don't always know what they are talking about
HaHa, I did exactly the same thing in my detached garage in AZ. They make sense in a residential garage with moms, mini vans and kids bikes but not in my workshop.He also got me on the garage door reversing sensors being mounted on the ceiling about 6" apart.

I've considered doing that several times but haven't taken the plunge yet. Was considering adding a second set but haven't delved in to the details on how/if it would work. LiftMaster 8500.Mine have been raised to bumper height. If the car is not in far enough, the door won't close. Many years ago, my sister backed her car into her garage, but stopped short so she could unload groceries from the trunk. Hours later, reached into the garage and pushed the button. She looked again when the door reversed, only to find that the reversal was because it had hit the hood of her car.
Her husband raised the sensors to bumper height to prevent that happening again, I did the same to mine.
.

There is nothing new about the 40% area requirement. It's been that way for decades even if the language has changed a bit. It's also not a feed through because it begins in this box at the circuit breaker. It's a feed through only if it begins and ends outside the box.Interesting. Based on the 2023 change in code, it appears in #1 below that the box is too full which then means the splice a code violation. Thanks @LXCam
Also, on second glance, I think I’d need to look at what a feed thru is technically. That particular splice actually goes both to the inside of the house to the AC unit and the exits the box in a second place to go to the outlet by the condenser.
Our code guy told me that in-place panel replacement here does not count as "modifying branch circuits" which is what would trigger the need to bring the branch up to current code. Relocating the panel does.A replacement would absolutely qualify. Beyond that, if you aren't touching it, it's fine to leave alone, code-wise.
Go to this site for proof and a laugh: https://forum.nachi.org/c/specific-inspection-topics/electrical-inspections/22Home inspectors rarely know what they are talking about and their weakest subject is electrical.
Alright, I've read 3 threads there and I'm out.Go to this site for proof and a laugh: https://forum.nachi.org/c/specific-inspection-topics/electrical-inspections/22
forum.nachi.org
Generally you can extend up to 6 feet without an issue as I recall. I added a sub-panel a few years ago adjacent to my main, but it was placed where the circuits came through so we actually shortened the cables a bit. New breakers were dual function, but we reused several conventional CBs as I reduced the number of branches out of the main and eliminated some twins.Our code guy told me that in-place panel replacement here does not count as "modifying branch circuits" which is what would trigger the need to bring the branch up to current code. Relocating the panel does.
Go to this site for proof and a laugh: https://forum.nachi.org/c/specific-inspection-topics/electrical-inspections/22
Wow theres some silly stuff on there.Go to this site for proof and a laugh: https://forum.nachi.org/c/specific-inspection-topics/electrical-inspections/22