The HF version is live online; https://www.harborfreight.com/colle...just-push-button-slip-joint-pliers-70310.html
This cracks me up! - Sadlybut HF counter-sued Snap-On for false advertising, claiming the jacks were made in the USA when they are actually made in the same factory as the HF jacks, and both use Chinese parts.
Nothing in this post is accurate.So, I'm guessing they have a license deal to sell generic Knipex and Snap-On pliers. Otherwise, they are straight up selling counterfeits. The lack of lawsuits make me think the former is reason. They could have been emboldened by the Daytona jacks case, but it's more than tools that look the same. These have actual functions that are directly copied.
In the SawStop suit, SS definitely won. Bosch had to shelve their design and couldn't sell it, at least in the US. I forget what kind of international patent coverage the guy at SS had, but he was a patent attorney before he founded SS.You can practically sue anyone for anything in the USA,
But, for Harbor Freight to be sued over the Icon pliers, they would really need to have violated a patent, or trademark, or design patent, and even then, the entity suing HF would need to prove that HF actually violated a patent or trademark, and the entity could wind ip having their patent or trademark challenged or found to have been issued in error.
When SawStop sued Bosch over there similar saw, I believe some of the Sawstop patents were actually successfully challenged.
Anybody suing Harbor Freight would likely need deep pockets as well.
Black & Decker, (Dewalt) sued when Harbor Freight make yellow and black tools, since B&D had somehow trademarked the color combination, and B&D won, hence no more Black and Yellow Harbor Freight tools.
The Icon pliers routinelly just look generic, or have the distinctive “arrow hatch” design, so the tools can’t be mistaken for name brand tools that might have filed design patents.
I suspect Harbor Freight carefully checks patents and trademarks nowadays, and once a product has been on the market for a while, a manufacturer can’t really sue Harbor Freight for design patent or trademark infringement, because it’s really necessary to file a complaint as soon as the violation comes to the notice of whoever’s rights are being violated, and Harbor Freight is hardly some hidden retailer at this point.
The design change (facings to accept soft jaw covers) you're talking about with Knipex did not extend their patent coverage. It expired with all the rest. The Icon Pliers Wrench is kind of a hybrid between the old and new Knipex designs. FWIW, I tried the soft jaw covers from my Knipex pair on the icon pair. They didn't nearly fit.After doing a little digging, Snap-on sued HF over the floor jack (which we all know), but HF counter-sued Snap-On for false advertising, claiming the jacks were made in the USA when they are actually made in the same factory as the HF jacks, and both use Chinese parts.
But eventually, both companies settled, and both suits were dismissed. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed, but it does make me wonder if they found a compromise. Snap-On designs the tool (pliers), makes it in America, while HF sells a near identical copy (which they claim is designed in the US) but makes them in Taiwan. I could see HF paying a license for the design, and maybe royalties or something like that. Both companies make money.
The Knipex pliers-wrench patent expired, which is why Knipex changed the design a little, but HF version is nearly identical, down to the rhombus-shaped openings in the head, which would be hard to defend. Plus their Twin-Grip pliers are a new design, so surely the patent still exists.
I know HF has deep pockets and patent attorneys to find workarounds, but I think it would be easier and mutually beneficial to simply get a for the product.
The Sap-On Talon Grips fon’t have the inline screw gripping serrations like the TwinGrip and various Japanese screw pliers have.I got the LN46ACF Snap On "Talon Grips" and the Knipex "Twin Grips" on the same day and compared them.
The Talons weren't doing much on some screws I drove into a scrap piece of wood and lopped the heads off with the grinder. The Twin Grips were immediately effective.
The Talons are a go-to for car stuff, where the TwinGrips are in the home box.
I'll grab a pair of the Icons and stick them in my travel bag.
Concerning color scheme Trademarks.Nothing in this post is accurate.
In the SawStop suit, SS definitely won. Bosch had to shelve their design and couldn't sell it, at least in the US. I forget what kind of international patent coverage the guy at SS had, but he was a patent attorney before he founded SS.
I haven't seen the B&D suit you're referring to, but it's extremely hard to claim colors as trade-dress. Possible, but hard. I'll go back and look at some point, but I strongly doubt B&D "won". Lincoln also sued HF on similar grounds, and got absolutely nowhere.
There was an extensive thread here on the Snap On vs. HF. I'd point you to this post - I'd looked up and read the case file. Net: SO didn't "win" anything at all in any sense of the word other than a strange lingering notion on the internet that because they sued HF they won. The judge pretty much slapped Snap On down and strongly suggested they settle - their case was not only extremely weak on the merits but also very-poorly constructed. My guess is the reason the settlement was private was they agreed to cover HF's legal costs or similar. HF continued to operate in all respects as before with the Daytona jack.
There are a lot of very-specific laws surrounding patents, copyrights and trademarks. HF is pretty clearly careful about not infringing. I'd note that patents expire very specifically so that intellectual property can be more-broadly available to the public, which encourages competition and better prices for the public. What is happening with HF and these products is literally the system performing as designed.
Do I think HF should have changed the ID on the Pliers Wrench? Absolutely. Are they infringing on any intellectual property? No. (at least as best I can tell. I'm not an attorney, but have been tortured by them many times over the years).
The design change (facings to accept soft jaw covers) you're talking about with Knipex did not extend their patent coverage. It expired with all the rest. The Icon Pliers Wrench is kind of a hybrid between the old and new Knipex designs. FWIW, I tried the soft jaw covers from my Knipex pair on the icon pair. They didn't nearly fit.




Concerning color scheme Trademarks.
Black Decker, 26 F. Supp. 2d 834 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Black Decker, 26 F. Supp. 2d 834, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com
Maybe I’m wrong about the lawsuit with Harbor Freight, but I remember HF offering tools in a yellow & black color scheme at one point, and stopping.
It might be too old to find easily in the internet.
Channellock also has the particular blue color of their grips trademarked.
![]()
Channellock scours globe to defend trademark tools
Channellock Inc. apparently has won the war, but it still must fight the occasional battle, according to company officials.Those battles are over registered U.S. trademark infringement — particularly on itswww.meadvilletribune.com
Personally, I feel trademarking specific colors is a bit restrictive, but it is a thing.
Apparently, “Tiffany Blue” is also trademarked.
Again, I'm not an attorney, but have a more-than-casual knowledge on the topic.Concerning color scheme Trademarks.
Black Decker, 26 F. Supp. 2d 834 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Black Decker, 26 F. Supp. 2d 834, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com
Maybe I’m wrong about the lawsuit with Harbor Freight, but I remember HF offering tools in a yellow & black color scheme at one point, and stopping.
It might be too old to find easily in the internet.
Channellock also has the particular blue color of their grips trademarked.
![]()
Channellock scours globe to defend trademark tools
Channellock Inc. apparently has won the war, but it still must fight the occasional battle, according to company officials.Those battles are over registered U.S. trademark infringement — particularly on itswww.meadvilletribune.com
Personally, I feel trademarking specific colors is a bit restrictive, but it is a thing.
Apparently, “Tiffany Blue” is also trademarked.
$100K isn't a lot, either.I knew that CL had the blue grip color trademarked, but...
Channellock spends about $100,000 per year on protecting its intellectual property, DeArment said.
Instead of spending $100k protecting the "IP" of its grip color, they should hire a mechanical designer and actually make new plier designs; instead of just selling 98% of the same **** they've been selling for decades. Or even just 90% copy the Snap On specialty designs and use alloy steel. Real rocket science here....
I'm aware. I just thought it was funny that they are both described as "slip-joint" pliers, but incredibly different in application/uses.The Sap-On Talon Grips fon’t have the inline screw gripping serrations like the TwinGrip and various Japanese screw pliers have.
My vote is return the Vampliers & get the favorite flavor(s) from Engineer. Vampliers are just rebranded higher priced Engineers. Even the grips on Vampliers have the Engineer name molded in them. Well unless one prefers to have the red grips.Keep the vampliers!
I shall bear that in mind.
Though it’s a solution that wouldn’t be needed with better design!
And the rough grips are still unpleasant to use!
Hmm the Twin Grips are 25€ here. Never saw the HF version but I'd always rather pay the ~5€ extra for the genuine deal. Though I assume the Knipex is much more pricey in the US.The HF version is live online; https://www.harborfreight.com/colle...just-push-button-slip-joint-pliers-70310.html
Knipex is about $40 here, which is way more. If it were roughly the same cost, I'd go Knipex all day.Hmm the Twin Grips are 25€ here. Never saw the HF version but I'd always rather pay the ~5€ extra for the genuine deal. Though I assume the Knipex is much more pricey in the US.
Not as well but they do fit the nostrils better.So, how do the Merrys do on nose hairs?
It depends on whether you need a bunch of tools because you’re starting out.Knipex Twin Grips are currently $36 on Amazon. C'mon. Is it really worth it to save $16 on the HF version vs supporting the company that actually INNOVATES and designs new ****????? And is proven in quality and made in Germany? I know a lot of people will say no, I buy the cheapest **** I can, and that's fine; but it's worth it to me to support a company that actually employs engineers and designers and develops new products instead of just copies.
Good one!!! Your going to get someone in trouble!Return? Keep them both plus buy the Fujiya's. Because Garage Journal.
Knipex blows to warranty. You have to pay to mail it to them, and they can decline the warranty. Harbor Freight you get 95% of the same tool and if something happens, you can walk in and out with a replacement.Knipex Twin Grips are currently $36 on Amazon. C'mon. Is it really worth it to save $16 on the HF version vs supporting the company that actually INNOVATES and designs new ****????? And is proven in quality and made in Germany? I know a lot of people will say no, I buy the cheapest **** I can, and that's fine; but it's worth it to me to support a company that actually employs engineers and designers and develops new products instead of just copies.
Patents do expire.So, I'm guessing they have a license deal to sell generic Knipex and Snap-On pliers. Otherwise, they are straight up selling counterfeits. The lack of lawsuits make me think the former is reason. They could have been emboldened by the Daytona jacks case, but it's more than tools that look the same. These have actual functions that are directly copied.
Why? They do have new pliers designs. Their oldest design (nut buster pliers) is their best. They should use that money to hire some guys to polish their pliers. They used to be beautiful, but now they look uglier than my neighbors half sister (which also happens to be his grandmother, and aunt).I knew that CL had the blue grip color trademarked, but...
Channellock spends about $100,000 per year on protecting its intellectual property, DeArment said.
Instead of spending $100k protecting the "IP" of its grip color, they should hire a mechanical designer and actually make new plier designs; instead of just selling 98% of the same **** they've been selling for decades. Or even just 90% copy the Snap On specialty designs and use alloy steel. Real rocket science here....
Why? They do have new pliers designs. Their oldest design (nut buster pliers) is their best. They should use that money to hire some guys to polish their pliers. They used to be beautiful, but now they look uglier than my neighbors half sister (which also happens to be his grandmother, and aunt).
Goop, another liquid hand cleaner, does the same. I browse ReStore shops and often find good serviceable tools with grease-marked handles, especially with a plastic coating. The liquid hand cleaner really works as Wamsutta says above.I shall bear that in mind.
Though it’s a solution that wouldn’t be needed with better design!
And the rough grips are still unpleasant to use!