To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Knipex Twin Grip

To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

M635_Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Messages
4,333
Location
NC
So, I'm guessing they have a license deal to sell generic Knipex and Snap-On pliers. Otherwise, they are straight up selling counterfeits. The lack of lawsuits make me think the former is reason. They could have been emboldened by the Daytona jacks case, but it's more than tools that look the same. These have actual functions that are directly copied.
Nothing in this post is accurate.
You can practically sue anyone for anything in the USA,
But, for Harbor Freight to be sued over the Icon pliers, they would really need to have violated a patent, or trademark, or design patent, and even then, the entity suing HF would need to prove that HF actually violated a patent or trademark, and the entity could wind ip having their patent or trademark challenged or found to have been issued in error.
When SawStop sued Bosch over there similar saw, I believe some of the Sawstop patents were actually successfully challenged.
Anybody suing Harbor Freight would likely need deep pockets as well.
Black & Decker, (Dewalt) sued when Harbor Freight make yellow and black tools, since B&D had somehow trademarked the color combination, and B&D won, hence no more Black and Yellow Harbor Freight tools.
The Icon pliers routinelly just look generic, or have the distinctive “arrow hatch” design, so the tools can’t be mistaken for name brand tools that might have filed design patents.
I suspect Harbor Freight carefully checks patents and trademarks nowadays, and once a product has been on the market for a while, a manufacturer can’t really sue Harbor Freight for design patent or trademark infringement, because it’s really necessary to file a complaint as soon as the violation comes to the notice of whoever’s rights are being violated, and Harbor Freight is hardly some hidden retailer at this point.
In the SawStop suit, SS definitely won. Bosch had to shelve their design and couldn't sell it, at least in the US. I forget what kind of international patent coverage the guy at SS had, but he was a patent attorney before he founded SS.

I haven't seen the B&D suit you're referring to, but it's extremely hard to claim colors as trade-dress. Possible, but hard. I'll go back and look at some point, but I strongly doubt B&D "won". Lincoln also sued HF on similar grounds, and got absolutely nowhere.

There was an extensive thread here on the Snap On vs. HF. I'd point you to this post - I'd looked up and read the case file. Net: SO didn't "win" anything at all in any sense of the word other than a strange lingering notion on the internet that because they sued HF they won. The judge pretty much slapped Snap On down and strongly suggested they settle - their case was not only extremely weak on the merits but also very-poorly constructed. My guess is the reason the settlement was private was they agreed to cover HF's legal costs or similar. HF continued to operate in all respects as before with the Daytona jack.

There are a lot of very-specific laws surrounding patents, copyrights and trademarks. HF is pretty clearly careful about not infringing. I'd note that patents expire very specifically so that intellectual property can be more-broadly available to the public, which encourages competition and better prices for the public. What is happening with HF and these products is literally the system performing as designed.

Do I think HF should have changed the ID on the Pliers Wrench? Absolutely. Are they infringing on any intellectual property? No. (at least as best I can tell. I'm not an attorney, but have been tortured by them many times over the years).
After doing a little digging, Snap-on sued HF over the floor jack (which we all know), but HF counter-sued Snap-On for false advertising, claiming the jacks were made in the USA when they are actually made in the same factory as the HF jacks, and both use Chinese parts.

But eventually, both companies settled, and both suits were dismissed. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed, but it does make me wonder if they found a compromise. Snap-On designs the tool (pliers), makes it in America, while HF sells a near identical copy (which they claim is designed in the US) but makes them in Taiwan. I could see HF paying a license for the design, and maybe royalties or something like that. Both companies make money.

The Knipex pliers-wrench patent expired, which is why Knipex changed the design a little, but HF version is nearly identical, down to the rhombus-shaped openings in the head, which would be hard to defend. Plus their Twin-Grip pliers are a new design, so surely the patent still exists.

I know HF has deep pockets and patent attorneys to find workarounds, but I think it would be easier and mutually beneficial to simply get a for the product.
The design change (facings to accept soft jaw covers) you're talking about with Knipex did not extend their patent coverage. It expired with all the rest. The Icon Pliers Wrench is kind of a hybrid between the old and new Knipex designs. FWIW, I tried the soft jaw covers from my Knipex pair on the icon pair. They didn't nearly fit.
 

M635_Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Messages
4,333
Location
NC
I got the LN46ACF Snap On "Talon Grips" and the Knipex "Twin Grips" on the same day and compared them.

The Talons weren't doing much on some screws I drove into a scrap piece of wood and lopped the heads off with the grinder. The Twin Grips were immediately effective.

The Talons are a go-to for car stuff, where the TwinGrips are in the home box.

I'll grab a pair of the Icons and stick them in my travel bag.
 

neophyte

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
9,577
Location
Pennsylvannia
I got the LN46ACF Snap On "Talon Grips" and the Knipex "Twin Grips" on the same day and compared them.

The Talons weren't doing much on some screws I drove into a scrap piece of wood and lopped the heads off with the grinder. The Twin Grips were immediately effective.

The Talons are a go-to for car stuff, where the TwinGrips are in the home box.

I'll grab a pair of the Icons and stick them in my travel bag.
The Sap-On Talon Grips fon’t have the inline screw gripping serrations like the TwinGrip and various Japanese screw pliers have.
 

neophyte

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
9,577
Location
Pennsylvannia
Nothing in this post is accurate.

In the SawStop suit, SS definitely won. Bosch had to shelve their design and couldn't sell it, at least in the US. I forget what kind of international patent coverage the guy at SS had, but he was a patent attorney before he founded SS.

I haven't seen the B&D suit you're referring to, but it's extremely hard to claim colors as trade-dress. Possible, but hard. I'll go back and look at some point, but I strongly doubt B&D "won". Lincoln also sued HF on similar grounds, and got absolutely nowhere.

There was an extensive thread here on the Snap On vs. HF. I'd point you to this post - I'd looked up and read the case file. Net: SO didn't "win" anything at all in any sense of the word other than a strange lingering notion on the internet that because they sued HF they won. The judge pretty much slapped Snap On down and strongly suggested they settle - their case was not only extremely weak on the merits but also very-poorly constructed. My guess is the reason the settlement was private was they agreed to cover HF's legal costs or similar. HF continued to operate in all respects as before with the Daytona jack.

There are a lot of very-specific laws surrounding patents, copyrights and trademarks. HF is pretty clearly careful about not infringing. I'd note that patents expire very specifically so that intellectual property can be more-broadly available to the public, which encourages competition and better prices for the public. What is happening with HF and these products is literally the system performing as designed.

Do I think HF should have changed the ID on the Pliers Wrench? Absolutely. Are they infringing on any intellectual property? No. (at least as best I can tell. I'm not an attorney, but have been tortured by them many times over the years).

The design change (facings to accept soft jaw covers) you're talking about with Knipex did not extend their patent coverage. It expired with all the rest. The Icon Pliers Wrench is kind of a hybrid between the old and new Knipex designs. FWIW, I tried the soft jaw covers from my Knipex pair on the icon pair. They didn't nearly fit.
Concerning color scheme Trademarks.




Maybe I’m wrong about the lawsuit with Harbor Freight, but I remember HF offering tools in a yellow & black color scheme at one point, and stopping.
It might be too old to find easily in the internet.

Channellock also has the particular blue color of their grips trademarked.


Personally, I feel trademarking specific colors is a bit restrictive, but it is a thing.

Apparently, “Tiffany Blue” is also trademarked.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0120.png
    IMG_0120.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 23
  • IMG_0121.png
    IMG_0121.png
    293.9 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_0122.png
    IMG_0122.png
    386.7 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_0123.png
    IMG_0123.png
    795.5 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_0124.png
    IMG_0124.png
    913.1 KB · Views: 11

Steve_P

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
5,182
I have multiple Engineer screw pliers and the Knipex Twin Grip. The jaw serrations on the TG are holding up much better than the Engineer, which have seen little use, and it's all been on the typical soft phillips head screws that tend to strip out- what they're designed for.
 

darkzero

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
3,317
Location
SoCal
Since the Engineers were brought up, which I also have, here's the Merrys. I haven't used the Merrys for screw extraction yet though. Their teeth are a lot more coarse so to speak so I assume might not work good for smaller screws. I use my Engineers for the smaller stuff.

20220721_133710.jpg20210517_190046.jpg20210517_190320.jpg

To be honest I could live without the em but I love the look of the smooth rounded over profile & just to have to complete my Merry pliers "collection". They are the only ones I really don't use out of the bunch.
20211217_171806.jpg
 
Last edited:

Steve_P

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
5,182
Concerning color scheme Trademarks.




Maybe I’m wrong about the lawsuit with Harbor Freight, but I remember HF offering tools in a yellow & black color scheme at one point, and stopping.
It might be too old to find easily in the internet.

Channellock also has the particular blue color of their grips trademarked.


Personally, I feel trademarking specific colors is a bit restrictive, but it is a thing.

Apparently, “Tiffany Blue” is also trademarked.

I knew that CL had the blue grip color trademarked, but...

Channellock spends about $100,000 per year on protecting its intellectual property, DeArment said.

Instead of spending $100k protecting the "IP" of its grip color, they should hire a mechanical designer and actually make new plier designs; instead of just selling 98% of the same **** they've been selling for decades. Or even just 90% copy the Snap On specialty designs and use alloy steel. Real rocket science here....
 

M635_Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Messages
4,333
Location
NC
Concerning color scheme Trademarks.




Maybe I’m wrong about the lawsuit with Harbor Freight, but I remember HF offering tools in a yellow & black color scheme at one point, and stopping.
It might be too old to find easily in the internet.

Channellock also has the particular blue color of their grips trademarked.


Personally, I feel trademarking specific colors is a bit restrictive, but it is a thing.

Apparently, “Tiffany Blue” is also trademarked.
Again, I'm not an attorney, but have a more-than-casual knowledge on the topic.

I started getting a headache scanning the DeWalt suit, but it appears (A) it had nothing to do with HF, and (B) the companies they were suing copied more than just their colors.

Tiffany has definitely got trade dress coverage on "Tiffany Blue" but things like that wind up being pretty narrow. In their case, they literally created a specific shade of blue to protect as theirs. I don't know for a fact, but I kinda doubt ChannelLock has any particular coverage on "their" color of blue. But who knows. I honestly think it is silly to try to hang your hat on a color.
 

M635_Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Messages
4,333
Location
NC
I knew that CL had the blue grip color trademarked, but...

Channellock spends about $100,000 per year on protecting its intellectual property, DeArment said.

Instead of spending $100k protecting the "IP" of its grip color, they should hire a mechanical designer and actually make new plier designs; instead of just selling 98% of the same **** they've been selling for decades. Or even just 90% copy the Snap On specialty designs and use alloy steel. Real rocket science here....
$100K isn't a lot, either.

And I have zero love for Channel Lock - I gave all mine to Habitat when I got my Knipex stuff.
 

M635_Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Messages
4,333
Location
NC
The Sap-On Talon Grips fon’t have the inline screw gripping serrations like the TwinGrip and various Japanese screw pliers have.
I'm aware. I just thought it was funny that they are both described as "slip-joint" pliers, but incredibly different in application/uses.
 

jttc09

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Messages
18
I got a set of these off the MATCO truck a few weeks ago and holy cow. I love them. just a few days ago I use them to pull out a roll pin that was still 3/4 of the way in. I use them all the time to pull out cotter pins I just grabb the loop end and just yank. the grip strength on them allows me to pull out the whole cotter pin Usually in one pull.
 

darkzero

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
3,317
Location
SoCal
Keep the vampliers!
My vote is return the Vampliers & get the favorite flavor(s) from Engineer. Vampliers are just rebranded higher priced Engineers. Even the grips on Vampliers have the Engineer name molded in them. Well unless one prefers to have the red grips.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Wamsutta

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
10,870
Location
Amarillo, Texas
I shall bear that in mind.

Though it’s a solution that wouldn’t be needed with better design!

And the rough grips are still unpleasant to use!

It's amazing how people can vary so much in their preferences. I actually prefer the textured grip of the Knipex over the typical smooth vinyl.

Snap-on has had a version of the textured grip for many years now and I really like their grips.
 

Steve_P

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
5,182
Knipex Twin Grips are currently $36 on Amazon. C'mon. Is it really worth it to save $16 on the HF version vs supporting the company that actually INNOVATES and designs new ****????? And is proven in quality and made in Germany? I know a lot of people will say no, I buy the cheapest **** I can, and that's fine; but it's worth it to me to support a company that actually employs engineers and designers and develops new products instead of just copies.
 

neophyte

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
9,577
Location
Pennsylvannia
Knipex Twin Grips are currently $36 on Amazon. C'mon. Is it really worth it to save $16 on the HF version vs supporting the company that actually INNOVATES and designs new ****????? And is proven in quality and made in Germany? I know a lot of people will say no, I buy the cheapest **** I can, and that's fine; but it's worth it to me to support a company that actually employs engineers and designers and develops new products instead of just copies.
It depends on whether you need a bunch of tools because you’re starting out.
It also may depend on how you use the tools and were.
If your tools have a high probability of getting stolen by meth addicts, you probably choose to save the money.
 

Callelle

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
637
Location
Depew NY
Knipex Twin Grips are currently $36 on Amazon. C'mon. Is it really worth it to save $16 on the HF version vs supporting the company that actually INNOVATES and designs new ****????? And is proven in quality and made in Germany? I know a lot of people will say no, I buy the cheapest **** I can, and that's fine; but it's worth it to me to support a company that actually employs engineers and designers and develops new products instead of just copies.
Knipex blows to warranty. You have to pay to mail it to them, and they can decline the warranty. Harbor Freight you get 95% of the same tool and if something happens, you can walk in and out with a replacement.
 

darkzero

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
3,317
Location
SoCal
Might be pointless posting this but hopefully someone here snags it. Knipex Twingrip is $27.00 new right now, only 1 left (seller Mr.Tools, ships from Amz).

I purchased my second pair last Sept for $25.80 new. These still fluctuate in price quite often on Amazon as well as available as AWDs.

EDIT: And n/m, it's gone, that was quick!
 

Grokew

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
356
Location
Home
So, I'm guessing they have a license deal to sell generic Knipex and Snap-On pliers. Otherwise, they are straight up selling counterfeits. The lack of lawsuits make me think the former is reason. They could have been emboldened by the Daytona jacks case, but it's more than tools that look the same. These have actual functions that are directly copied.
Patents do expire.

Don't be like me with the infamous "counterfeit" AutoZone Duralast screwdriver (Who the F is going to spend time making a fake Duralast screwdriver?) I still find it difficult to visit the store.


Gas pliers had the same "Screw gripper" tip design, more than 80 years ago.
 
Last edited:

Grokew

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
356
Location
Home
I knew that CL had the blue grip color trademarked, but...

Channellock spends about $100,000 per year on protecting its intellectual property, DeArment said.

Instead of spending $100k protecting the "IP" of its grip color, they should hire a mechanical designer and actually make new plier designs; instead of just selling 98% of the same **** they've been selling for decades. Or even just 90% copy the Snap On specialty designs and use alloy steel. Real rocket science here....
Why? They do have new pliers designs. Their oldest design (nut buster pliers) is their best. They should use that money to hire some guys to polish their pliers. They used to be beautiful, but now they look uglier than my neighbors half sister (which also happens to be his grandmother, and aunt).
 
OP
D

Dave455

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
5,800
Location
Sussex, England
Why? They do have new pliers designs. Their oldest design (nut buster pliers) is their best. They should use that money to hire some guys to polish their pliers. They used to be beautiful, but now they look uglier than my neighbors half sister (which also happens to be his grandmother, and aunt).
:LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL:

I came to this forum for the tools. Sometimes I stick around for the cabaret..!
 

AreBeeBee

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Messages
415
Location
Wisconsin
I shall bear that in mind.

Though it’s a solution that wouldn’t be needed with better design!

And the rough grips are still unpleasant to use!
Goop, another liquid hand cleaner, does the same. I browse ReStore shops and often find good serviceable tools with grease-marked handles, especially with a plastic coating. The liquid hand cleaner really works as Wamsutta says above.

The cleaner also works, though less thoroughly, on wood handles for hammers and other tools. I suspect it's because grease can soak into the wood's grain.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom