PugetDude
ALLIANCE MEMBER
How are they going to blow all the turds off the sidewalks in California?



How are they going to blow all the turds off the sidewalks in California?
![]()
It's not really the pollution - it's the damn noise!
I know they banned them in Beverly Hills decades ago, all the Vietnamese landscapers went back to rakes and brooms.
2 of my neighbors have those things and they use them for hours at a time - drives me nuts after a while.
It's my understanding that they just elect them into office.How are they going to blow all the turds off the sidewalks in California?
![]()
Small engines have obnoxiously bad emissions. Modern cars with with their tightly coupled catalytic converters and real time feedback with wide-band O2 sensors have extremely little emissions. In some cities, the exhaust coming out of the tailpipe of a modern car has less NOx, CO and HC than the "clean" air going into the engine.So my lawn mower that takes 6 hours to burn 1 gallon produces about the same air pollution as 43 cars burning 20640 gallons of gas?
What did I do wrong?![]()
Nobody can argue that gas powered leaf blowers are f*cking loud. And if the truth be told, we all hate listening to them. Them's the facts...
That does not mean that they should be banned. But, they should be optimized like every other product in the world. Nobody can argue that automobiles of today are far superior to cars of the past; it is not a debate because it is fact. That does not mean that old cars are ****** or should be banned. It's just a fact. Look at phones, computers, flashlights, everything today is optimized and most of it we all love. At the same time, many of us love the old stuff too. Both old and new can coexist. We live in an AND world; not an OR world.
F*ck the politicians and the banning of Big-Gulps and all of the PC ****. Just use you gas powered leaf blower but be mindful and respectful of your neighbors.
Then think of the 2-strokes that constantly emit a light haze of oil smoke.
I would like to see a study on how much of the total global pollution that small engines are actually responsible for. I would bet it's about as close to non-existent as you can get.
A quick Google brought this up: The EPA estimates that hour-for-hour, gasoline powered lawn mowers produce 11 times as much pollution as a new car. According to the EPA, each gas-powered lawn mower produces as much air pollution as 43 new automobiles driven 12,000 per year – lawn care produces 13 billion pounds of toxic pollutants per year.
While I loves me some internal combustion, I personally dislike gas powered mowers, weed whackers and leaf blowers. As much for the noise as for the stink. I live in a desert so I have no lawn, but the few shrubs that need trimming are done with an electric chainsaw or electric trimmer and any clean up that can't be done with a rake or broom is done with an electric blower. I don't miss cleaning carburetors and tanks either.
^ this. I’m TIRED of people complaining that what THEY dont like should be “banned”..
I have an idea - let’s BAN condos. Problem solved.. welcome to California.
The level of self importance in this world has risen to the point that masses of people feel as if THEY shouldn’t have to be “inconvienced” by the rest of society.
don't want to be told I can't use gas powered equipment.
The idea of wanting and trying to make this job quicker and easier reveals our cultural malaise.
I'll pull up my soapbox and be the 'Okay, Boomer' minority of 1 here and gladly suffer the consequences.
I'm no liberal, I’m no Luddite, and I'm certainly no fan of federal intervention, but I wish gas-powered leaf-blowers were banned nationally. And the noise, odor, pollution, and dust are only second, third, fourth, and fifth on my list of grievances.
Number 1 is the utter and absolute disgrace of the entire concept. If my parents and their parents and their parents before them etc could use a rake to clean up a yard, so can I, no matter how long it takes - and it usually takes me a whole day, with several breaks in between, three or four times a year, for a 1-acre yard with ten trees. My neighbor on the right is elderly, so me and the guy to his right do his, too. The local Boy Scout troop and a church group take care of people without friendly neighbors. The idea of wanting and trying to make this job quicker and easier reveals our cultural malaise. Quicker and easier is not always better. In fact, from my perspective, the goal of trying to make everything quicker and easier is what put us on the fat, dumb, and lazy road to hell in a handbasket in this country.


I own a Stihl BR500 (bought it in 2006). It was designed to get around the bans based on decibel levels. It’s got sound isolation around the blower fan as well as a “muffler” in the output tube. It’s quieter than most electric blowers. It’s also 4-stroke and has a catalytic converters, so the exhaust doesn’t leave you stinking.
I’ve never seen a pro use one though, because there are far more powerful options on the market, even though they’re louder.
For me, I looked at the expense of a backpack blower as justified by the amount I use it. I hate the obnoxious sound of most blowers, and I dislike having to wear hearing protection. So if I bought a cheaper (and probably more powerful) blower, I’d use it only when I have to. Maybe as little as once a year. But with this beauty, I choose to use it as often as it is helpful.
I mean, why the heck are you sending leaves to the land fill?
yep.... dang California! we were a lot better off with leaded gasoline and no emission controls on automobiles! yeah!
bwaaaaahahahaaahaaa!
hopefully they'll institute a state-wide ban on the goddam things, and being the fifth largest economy on the planet, the manufacturers of such devices will have to go back to the drawing board and come up with a better product that doesn't make so damn much noise and pump so much **** into the atmosphere!![]()
Something like this?
The BR500 is a 4-Mix ? I thought you had to step up to the BR700 to get the 4-Mix. The STIHL website is no help because they don't tell you whether their blowers are 2-cycle or 4-cycle.
4.c!yep.... dang California! we were a lot better off with leaded gasoline and no emission controls on automobiles! yeah!
bwaaaaahahahaaahaaa!
hopefully they'll institute a state-wide ban on the goddam things, and being the fifth largest economy on the planet, the manufacturers of such devices will have to go back to the drawing board and come up with a better product that doesn't make so damn much noise and pump so much **** into the atmosphere!![]()
A rake is a tool. A hand tool. I prefer the original models made out of cane, but I hear they make these new-fangled jobbies made out of plastic, and I hear they are just as effective.That a desire to use a tool to make a job easier reveals a cultural malaise is certainly a hot take, especially on a forum for tool enthusiasts!
I move on to other productive tasks the next day, and the day after that after those are accomplished. All good things in their time. Quicker isn't always better, progress is debatable, and in our haste, in the guise of progress, we are making a lot of collective mistakes that affect everyone. But we can agree to disagree.Spacey_G said:What a disgrace, getting a mundane job done quickly so we can move on to other productive tasks and make some real progress!
By my logic, I'm simply pointing out the irrefutable fact that for centuries, Americans found a way to clear their property of natural deciduous and coniferous droppings and refuse before the advent of gas-powered motors. Whatever it was in the plains or the Badlands or in high mountain desert, they did it. There is no argument that it probably took longer and required more manual labor than a gas-powered blower. But I've already said my so what? piece about that. You equating clean air to a delicate sensibility tells me that nothing positive can possibly come out of further discussion between us on this point.PugetDude said:So, by your logic I'm supposed to pay someone to spend hours doing a half-*** job with a rake or a broom doing something that takes 10-15 minutes with a blower because it offends someone's delicate sensibilities?
And I resent people who attempt to cling to an erroneous, misguided idea of personal liberty. We are all free to do whatever we want - as long as it doesn't harm others. Some things are not a matter of opinion and personal preference. Thankfully, emissions is one of them.PugetDude said:And, yeah, I resent those that think they should dictate those choices for others because they think their opinion matters more than the next guy's.
Guys...Husqvarna, Echo and Stihl all make battery powered leaf blowers. And mowers. And trimmers. And chainsaws. So does EGO which beats them head to head in some cases. Ask yourself why these pinnacles of gas powered lawn equipment are all producing battery powered equipment?
Small engine lawn equipment isn’t going away completely, but it’s use will be significantly diminished going forward. Honestly as an average homeowner I can’t for any logical reason think of why I’d buy a gas powered mower/trimmer/blower. Carbs, fuel mixing, maintenance, etc are all a PITA. Battery? Charge and go. Need more “fuel”? Buy another battery.
I’m perfectly fine with the ban on gas blowers, brought to you by the state that’s banning natural gas in homes. So there’s that.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-cities-banning-natural-gas-homes/4008346002/
Something like this?

I am going to make some assumptions.
car = 25 mpg, 60 mph = 2.4 gallons per hour
43 cars x 12000 miles per year (each car)= 516000 miles
516000 / 60mph = 8600 hours
8600 hour * 2.4 gph =20640 gallons
my gas powered lawnmower will cut grass for an hour on 20oz of gas.That equals 6 hours of cut time per gallon of gas.
So my lawn mower that takes 6 hours to burn 1 gallon produces about the same air pollution as 43 cars burning 20640 gallons of gas?
What did I do wrong?
even if you break it down to 8760 hours per year burning 20640 gallons it still comes down to cars burning 14.14 gallons in 6 hours vs lawn mower burning 1 gallon in 6 hours.
I'm interested to see how landscape and garden crews set up charging systems for all the large batteries they'll have. A dedicated toolbox wired for power with fans exhausting hot air, and self-contained to limit any fires could work. I think it would be much easier to be able to charge batteries on the truck than have to pull them off at night to charge and put back on the truck in the morning.