I'll be doing the lighting install in a 24 x24 garage in about 10 days. I'm using 6 x 4' LED strip lights. I am running 2 rows of 3 strips from front to back.
http://www.lightingproducts.philips.com/our-brands/daybrite/fluxstream-ez.html
Once up, I'll report back.
Here's what most people miss when talking about fluorescent lamps....Neat. Please do share when the time comes.
Some information to keep in mind:
- At approx. 4000 lumens of output, these lights produce about 2/3rds of the light of a standard 2 lamp 4' T8 fixture. Hopefully you didn't do your lighting design with an assumption of comparable output as you'll end up with a dimmer workspace than designed.
- At 95 lumens/watt these fixtures are just marginally more efficient than a standard 32W 4' T8 lamp (92 lumens/watt) and are actually less efficient than some of the high efficiency T8 lamps that you can buy. I'm really curious as to the cost of those fixtures. I don't think you'll ever see a return on investment vs T8 but cost isn't everything.
Here's what most people miss when talking about fluorescent lamps....
F32T8's produce about 2800 lumens when new. A standard ballast has a ballast factor of .88 (you have to multiply that). And since a fluorescent tube delivers those lumens in all directions, you have to factor in the wasted lumens that go straight up and also the loss of lumens that are reflected downward. The luminaire manufacturers provide this information. A typical fixture will have losses of 20-30%.
So, 2 x 2800 x .88 x .75 = 3696 delivered lumens.
The LED fixture has no ballast, so no ballast factor and there is no uplight or wasted lumens, so all 4000 lumens are delivered lumens. It's actually brighter than the 2 lamp T8 fixture.
80 CRI means better quality light than normal T8's (they are in the 70 range).
50,000 maintenance free hours of operation...even then they are still lit.
No glass lamps to worry about breaking or failing.
Frosted lens to reduce glare.
It's all good.
CD
LEDs are a really neat technology, I'm a big fan myself. However, you are fooling yourself here. No I'm not. I know exactly what I'm doing Your numbers reflect "Cheap home depot $14 special" T8 fixtures and lamps. You likely paid over $100 each for those LED fixtures, why not compare to a reasonable quality T8 fixture, ballast, and lamp? My figures are for a "standard" product, not an el cheapo.
Florescent fixtures have ballasts, LED fixtures have power supplies. They both result in similar efficiency loss. I wasn't talking about an efficiency loss, I was talking about Ballast Factor. LED Drivers dont have such a number. Buy a quality electronic ballast and you can easily get that factor up into the mid 90's.Not correct. T8 ballasts come in BF of .88 standard. No one seems to understand this. You can get a high ballast factor ballast that runs at about 1.18, but that's a special order fixture.
I'd argue that an inexpensive replaceable glass lamp is better than a plastic "unbreakable" lamp that cannot be replaced. Plus - in my experience the rated life expectancy of LED lamps is WAY less than advertised. Least they appear to have dropped their claim to 50,000hrs rather than the standard 100,000hr BS claim. Maybe I lead you to think that I was using LED lamps. I'm not. There are no lamps in these fixtures. I agree with you that some company's claims of life were just complete BS. Since testing started in independent labs and life certification testing started, most of these claims have stopped....at least by the legit companies. 50,000 hours at L70 is legit. And no lamp replacement. Ever.
Sure - if you buy the cheapest T8 lamp you can find it'll have a CRI in the low 70's. Buy a decent lamp and you can get CRI's well in excess of 80 with some lamps hitting the 90's. The older 70 series lamps are going to go away. The newer ones are just around 80. 90 CRI T8 lamps are rare and expensive. Same goes with efficiency. The cheapest lamp you can buy puts out 2800 lumens, spend just a dollar more and you are at 3000 lumens with more efficient (and expensive) options still on the table.200 lumens is splitting hairs and with the .88 BF, it's only 176 lumens more. The higher CRI of the LED will negate that.
As for losses due to reflections - True, but again you compare to the cheapest T8 fixture you can buy and you present like your LED fixtures also don't have losses of that same type. LED's are too focused and doping agents must be used in their design to scatter (aka reflect) that light. And still they tend to suffer from light distribution problems which you've conveniently forgotten to mention.The LED fixtures dont have the same issues. Different ones, maybe, but not the same ones. There are no fixture losses. ALL the lumens are delivered. Yes, both fixtures have lenses. In the case of the LED fixture, it's there to help with the beam angle because, as you said, they need help to change direction. The photometrics are on the link I provided. They are very good compared to a typical T8.
Frosted lens to reduce glare? You know that also describes every 2nd T8 fixture ever made right? It's frosted because it needs to reduce the glare of a bare LED. A T8 tube is frosted for a completely different reason.
I notice you still haven't told us how much you spent on these fixtures. Less than $100 each Let's be honest here - you will never see a cost savings vs T8. Quality T8 fixtures and lamps would have produced superior light and resulted in a lower total cost of ownership. Your motivation for buying something might be different than someone else's. In a residential setting, using energy savings as a criteria, it would be very hard to justify LED lighting. The typical homeowner simply doesn't burn their lights long enough to save enough watts. As to producing superior light, that is measured in CRI and the LED is equal to the T8. Factor in other things...
No more glass tubes.
Longer life, no burned out bulbs.
No hot or cold temp issues.
Can be used with motion sensors, which T8 instant start struggles with.
Uses 1/2 the wattage of 2 lamp T8.
I love LED's. They have lots of advantages and useful properties that make them an excellent choice for many lighting applications - it's just that general purpose overhead lighting isn't one of them. Do it for the cool factor, do it because you want to be different - but cost and light quality are not reasons for going LED.
Please keep us posted Cybrdyke , Im curious as well.
Todd, where did you get your fixtures at?
Todd, the LEDs do look really good. Who's your little helper?![]()
Any progress cyberdyke ?
I'll be doing the lighting install in a 24 x24 garage in about 10 days. I'm using 6 x 4' LED strip lights. I am running 2 rows of 3 strips from front to back.
http://www.lightingproducts.philips.com/our-brands/daybrite/fluxstream-ez.html
Once up, I'll report back.
Where did you buy these?
Which is for the cheapest lamps that have been banned since last July.Here's what most people miss when talking about fluorescent lamps....
F32T8's produce about 2800 lumens when new.
A standard ballast has a ballast factor of .88 (you have to multiply that). And since a fluorescent tube delivers those lumens in all directions, you have to factor in the wasted lumens that go straight up and also the loss of lumens that are reflected downward. The luminaire manufacturers provide this information. A typical fixture will have losses of 20-30%.
So, 2 x 2800 x .88 x .75 = 3696 delivered lumens.
What's the ballast factor of a Edison base 23W CFL or does that not have a ballast either?The LED fixture has no ballast, so no ballast factor and there is no uplight or wasted lumens, so all 4000 lumens are delivered lumens.

Probably. LEDs are good for making glare.It's actually brighterthan the 2 lamp T8 fixture.
For lamps that are essentially outlawed. (There might be one or two 700s still meeting standards..)80 CRI means better quality light than normal T8's (they are in the 70 range).
Which has never been verified. 50,000 hours of predicted life to pathetic 30% loss of lumens which is worse than T12 cool white and not even close to <10% depreciation of super T8.50,000 maintenance free hours of operation...even then they are still lit.
No glass lamps to worry about breaking or failing.
+1.LEDs are a really neat technology, I'm a big fan myself. However, you are fooling yourself here. Your numbers reflect "Cheap home depot $14 special" T8 fixtures and lamps.
LED fixtures have a non-standard proprietary driver that is not replaceable or cost more than the fixture to order.You likely paid over $100 each for those LED fixtures, why not compare to a reasonable quality T8 fixture, ballast, and lamp?
Florescent fixtures have ballasts, LED fixtures have power supplies. They both result in similar efficiency loss. Buy a quality electronic ballast and you can easily get that factor up into the mid 90's.
I'd argue that an inexpensive replaceable glass lamp is better than a plastic "unbreakable" lamp that cannot be replaced. Plus - in my experience the rated life expectancy of LED lamps is WAY less than advertised. Least they appear to have dropped their claim to 50,000hrs rather than the standard 100,000hr BS claim.
As for losses due to reflections - True, but again you compare to the cheapest T8 fixture you can buy and you present like your LED fixtures also don't have losses of that same type. LED's are too focused and doping agents must be used in their design to scatter (aka reflect) that light. And still they tend to suffer from light distribution problems which you've conveniently forgotten to mention.
Frosted lens to reduce glare? You know that also describes every 2nd T8 fixture ever made right?
I notice you still haven't told us how much you spent on these fixtures. Let's be honest here - you will never see a cost savings vs T8. Quality T8 fixtures and lamps would have produced superior light and resulted in a lower total cost of ownership.
I love LED's. They have lots of advantages and useful properties that make them an excellent choice for many lighting applications - it's just that general purpose overhead lighting isn't one of them. Do it for the cool factor, do it because you want to be different - but cost and light quality are not reasons for going LED.
And warranty is hardly ever adequate. Claims of reduced maintenance and energy over existing technology needs to be warrantied. For expensive as they are, the warranty coverage usually don't include: re-luminairing labor, LED decay rate or going beyond curve, excess wattage escalation rate(for nLight type decay compensating lights).LED technology changes daily. The speed at which improvements are coming out are just crazy. The lamp that sucked yesterday is pretty f'n good today. Less than a year ago, I was telling people the same thing....LEDs are not ready for general illumination. Today, nearly every new bilding project has LED troffers and or high bays specified. The improved products ARE ready. Maybe not for every single application type, but in general...they are ready. The fixture manufacturers even have been surprised at the speed of acceptance of these products.
I will admit, though, that I'm not certain if 6 of these will give me the fc that I want. My point x point is right on the edge. I am also putting in 4 LED "faux-cans", one in each corner, to fill in and to give me a little task lighting.
Happy to report back when they are up.
CD
But in the end will this be worth it? No ballast to go bad. Does the lamp itself have a long life span? If so then you may have spent your money wisely
Which is for the cheapest lamps that have been banned since last July.
70CRI lamps were banned, but they are still available and are still the most commonly purchased, until they are depleted. Although there are many choices, the replacement lamps in the 80 CRI range are also 2850 lumens, with some variants in the 2950 range.
The 3100 lumen T8 you keep spewing about is NOT a standard product, it's referred to as a "high lumen" lamp and is more of a niche product that is not commonly seen in mainstream lighting.
I get 4,600. 32W 841/HL 3,100 lumens x 0.88BF x 85%.
With your specialty lamp and an 85% efficient fixture, that would be correct. But it's uncommon in the real world. The most common, is as I stated, 2 x 2800 x .88 x .75 = 3696
What's the ballast factor of a Edison base 23W CFL or does that not have a ballast either?
This is the kind of comment that makes it crystal clear that you have no idea what you're talking about. There is a ballast in the base of that lamp. But being integrated into the lamp as a single unit makes the ballast factor moot. But, for your information, the same lamp with a 4pin GX24 base that uses an external ballast...that ballast factor is 1.0. mmmmkay?
Probably. LEDs are good for making glare.
Again, a comment that indicates ignorance. ALL light sources are glarey if left undiffused and in the line of sight. These days, nearly all quality LED manufacturers are diffusing the diodes.
For lamps that are essentially outlawed. (There might be one or two 700s still meeting standards..)
There are 700s that meet the standards. And they dont sell much because the 800's are better and they dont cost much more.
Which has never been verified. 50,000 hours of predicted life to pathetic 30% loss of lumens which is worse than T12 cool white and not even close to <10% depreciation of super T8.
This is where you are so totally wrong that it's kind of amazing. 50% of your favorite fluorescents are 100% D-E-A-D after 24,000 hours. I'd say that 30% dimmer beats 100% DEAD every day.
Shatter resistant doesn't mean unbreakable. Blue LED pumped solid state fluorescent lamps or UV pumped regular fluorescent lamps both require a power supply of some kind which goes by different names.
I never said unbreakable. Nothing is unbreakable. But broken LEDs dont have sharp glass, hazardous materials, phosphor dust, etc. Ask a hospital or a school if that's important to them.
+1.
LED fixtures have a non-standard proprietary driver that is not replaceable or cost more than the fixture to order.
B.S. Many do, some dont.
LEDs are rated as a fixture and if they're made to produce the same pattern as fairly inexpensive parabolic troffers (with a flat bottom beam pattern) rather than tear-drop pattern of wrap arounds, I bet the lumen per watt rating just goes down.
All of that information of provided by the lamp or fixture manufacturer. If you are concerned about it, it's there for you to plainly see.
And warranty is hardly ever adequate. Claims of reduced maintenance and energy over existing technology needs to be warrantied. For expensive as they are, the warranty coverage usually don't include: re-luminairing labor, LED decay rate or going beyond curve, excess wattage escalation rate(for nLight type decay compensating lights).
From the name brand companies, the warranties are more than adequate. Many of them are considerably longer than similar fixtures with other light sources. For instance, LED screw in lamps...I've seen warranties up to 3 years. Does an incandescent or CFL offer that? LED tubes...you can find warranties up to 5 years. Does a fluorescent tube offer that?
Till one fails and you have to replace all at once, because you can't find an exact replacement or the replacement do not match adequately in color
The major manufacturers, Acuity, Cooper, GE, Sylvania, Philips, etc...all expect the lighting industry to be over 80% LED products by 2020. That's only 5 years away. And if you look at the figures, they are already way ahead of that prediction.
CD