To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

let's see your craftsman block grinders

exmaxima1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
6,339
Location
Midwest
Just for craps and giggles, I tested to see how long it would take the grinding wheels to stop after I let the machine get up to speed. Took 3 minutes and 13 seconds! I guess the bearings are good! Haha

Actually, that means the bearings are dried out and SHOT. Fresh shielded bearings rarely roll more than a minute, and sealed bearings stop much faster yet. Of course, those heavy 8-inch wheels add a lot of mass, but 3 minutes is still way too long for good bearings.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

JZiggy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
990
Location
Atlanta
Actually, that means the bearings are dried out and SHOT. Fresh shielded bearings rarely roll more than a minute, and sealed bearings stop much faster yet. Of course, those heavy 8-inch wheels add a lot of mass, but 3 minutes is still way too long for good bearings.

Yep :)

I put sealed bearings in all of my overhauls and they bring the stones to a stop in more like 30 seconds at most. There should be a bit of drag from the grease and the seals.
 

MissileBear

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
339
Location
Western NY
MB: cool little grinder and looks like it might be a PRE BLOCK with that badge. is there a date stamp on that badge and can you take a close up picture and post it?

Badge pic attached - it's a Delco. Aren't pre-blocks all Packard units?
 

Attachments

  • cblock.jpg
    cblock.jpg
    136.2 KB · Views: 40

drivesitfar

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
36,007
Location
Pacific Northwest
MB: I can't recall exactly what you grinder looked like, but your badge is a PRE BLOCK sort of badge and with the January 1961 date i'm guessing it is. it's not common so you might have a somewhat rare one or maybe those just didn't get posted on this thread. in any case maybe Doc or another member can say for sure.

looked like a nice grinder when i first saw it and i personally like the block round top and the pre blocks better than the flat topped ones.

thanks for posting the close up of the badge and i hope some of what i said helped you.
 

AdrianBoomer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2015
Messages
235
Location
Novato, California
$20 bucks, did the bearings and a repaint, Matt is making me a new badge. It's a 19580. Im pretty stoked! Think I have located a pedestal for it, just need to find someone who is driving from MN to California LOL.
 

Attachments

  • image1(9).jpg
    image1(9).jpg
    21.2 KB · Views: 51

MissileBear

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
339
Location
Western NY
MB: I can't recall exactly what you grinder looked like, but your badge is a PRE BLOCK sort of badge and with the January 1961 date i'm guessing it is. it's not common so you might have a somewhat rare one or maybe those just didn't get posted on this thread. in any case maybe Doc or another member can say for sure.

Is there a specific feature that defines a block vs. a pre-block? I suppose I could look at the windings and compare... Aside from the cast iron body and different on/off switch, it's identical to the other early blocks I've seen.
 

drivesitfar

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
36,007
Location
Pacific Northwest
MB: i'm just used to the badges with the date stamp on the front like yours and some pre crowntop logo is what we call a PRE BLOCK. i'm here to learn otherwise if you think it's a BLOCK.

Adrian: best of luck on the stand finding its way to you, but nice find and restoration of your $20 block.
 

MissileBear

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
339
Location
Western NY

torqueman2002

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
6,139
Location
SE Michigan
I was under the impression that Delco (vendor code 397) never made a pre-block....pre-blocks were made exclusively by Packard (vendor code 115).

Torqueman has this same grinder listed as picture #1 on his FAQ - maybe he can chime in?
To my eye, and based on the model number prefix of 397, it is a very early cast iron, round top, Block.
"What is a Block grinder?
"... the classic Craftsman bench grinders that were manufactured for Sears by Paramount/Allegretti & Co. from the early 1960's to early 1980's. Affectionately known as "Block Motor" grinders because of their unique shape, these power tools have developed a large following among shop enthusiasts because of their legendary reliability, accuracy, and power.

The "Block Motor" grinder can be readily identified by the Sears manufacturer prefix of 397 or 257 (as in 397.XXXXX); which is stamped on the front label. Popular models include 1/4-HP, 1/3-HP, 1/2-HP, 3/4-HP, and 1-HP Industrial units.
"
Link to: "Vintage Craftsman "Block Motor" bench grinder info -" (source)
http://tinyurl.com/CM-Block-motor-style-grinders

"People always want to know what makes these things {CM Block grinders} so special; here's the reason. Look at those field windings. That is some VERY thick copper wire. When compared to a modern Chinese winding, these look GIGANTIC. The imports use very thin field wire. This is what makes these "block motors" so darn powerful and long lasting." Source - http://tinyurl.com/0-5-HP-CM-Block-Motor-FINISHED"

https://www.garagejournal.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4000526&postcount=1

:thumbup:
 

exmaxima1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
6,339
Location
Midwest
To my eye, and based on the model number prefix of 397, it is a very early cast iron, round top, Block.


"People always want to know what makes these things {CM Block grinders} so special; here's the reason. Look at those field windings. That is some VERY thick copper wire. When compared to a modern Chinese winding, these look GIGANTIC. The imports use very thin field wire. This is what makes these "block motors" so darn powerful and long lasting." Source - http://tinyurl.com/0-5-HP-CM-Block-Motor-FINISHED"

If the early cast iron "blocks" (397 mfr) share the same stator lamination dimensions as the later aluminum alloy blocks I would agree with you. And I don't really know for sure if they do. But I do know that the Pre-Block that I own has a MUCH larger stator lamination assembly than the alloy blocks, and the weight of its rotor/shaft assembly alone is nearly the full weight of a lower hp alloy block grinder.

Can you confirm that all Blocks (early cast iron and later alloy) share the same stator laminations and rotor diameters? If so, I absolutely agree with you. Otherwise I maintain that the differences between the cast iron Pre-Blocks and alloy Blocks is too great to segregate by manufacturer code.
 

torqueman2002

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
6,139
Location
SE Michigan
If the early cast iron "blocks" (397 mfr) share the same stator lamination dimensions as the later aluminum alloy blocks I would agree with you. And I don't really know for sure if they do. But I do know that the Pre-Block that I own has a MUCH larger stator lamination assembly than the alloy blocks, and the weight of its rotor/shaft assembly alone is nearly the full weight of a lower hp alloy block grinder.

Can you confirm that all Blocks (early cast iron and later alloy) share the same stator laminations and rotor diameters? If so, I absolutely agree with you. Otherwise I maintain that the differences between the cast iron Pre-Blocks and alloy Blocks is too great to segregate by manufacturer code.
I'm sorry, but I can't answer that very good question.

I have to defer to the OP in this thread. --> http://tinyurl.com/CM-Block-motor-style-grinders
 

exmaxima1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
6,339
Location
Midwest
I'm sorry, but I can't answer that very good question.

I have to defer to the OP in this thread. --> http://tinyurl.com/CM-Block-motor-style-grinders

From what I can glean from that thread, the term "Block" grinder was in regards to the shape and the manufacturer was mainly noted as a frame in time. I don't get the impression that the prior manufacturer was even considered (or known), or it would surely have been included since the block shape is essentially the same.

Since there are so many similarities in the tool rests, eyeshields, end bells, etc, it looks like Sears handed the tooling over to Paramount/Allegretti & Co and they commenced with the same cast iron designs for several years before re-tooling to the alloy versions in the early 60's. I would not be surprised if the early cast iron "blocks" shared the same motor structure as the prior Packard-made grinders. It would interesting if someone could take some pics and dimensions of their cast iron block components during a rebuild.

If it is confirmed that all cast iron versions have the same motor components, and different from later alloy versions, the decision should be made to either: a) include ALL the block-shaped grinders as "Block" grinders, or b) define all the cast-iron models of both manufacturers as "Pre-Block".

My vote will be for the latter if all the cast iron internals are the same (and different from alloy versions).
 

michaelwolson

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
163
Location
San Jose, CA
Very excited. Picked up my first true "block" grinder this past weekend. Paid $25 for it at an estate sale. My Dad said I should've counter offered $20 but I was just glad to find one in the Bay Area. Once restored it'll replace my newer craftsman grinder.

I am confused though. Here's the one I've had for a while (took the image from ebay):

attachment.php


That is not a "block grinder" right?

Here's my new acquisition waiting in a long line to be restored:

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600.jpg
    s-l1600.jpg
    142.8 KB · Views: 322
  • 20171111_150302.jpg
    20171111_150302.jpg
    149.8 KB · Views: 324
  • 20171111_150309.jpg
    20171111_150309.jpg
    147.9 KB · Views: 26

franksinatra

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2006
Messages
169
Location
Minnesota
Guys, I have a quick question on grinding stones and wire wheels. What size wheels are you using? I have a 6" wheel on now and it seems too small, granted it's lightly used. I have measured and a 7" wheel seems like it would easily fit but they don't have much for grit options. Anyone use the 7" wheels? Thanks for your help.
 

torqueman2002

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
6,139
Location
SE Michigan
From what I can glean from that thread, the term "Block" grinder was in regards to the shape and the manufacturer was mainly noted as a frame in time. I don't get the impression that the prior manufacturer was even considered (or known), or it would surely have been included since the block shape is essentially the same.

Since there are so many similarities in the tool rests, eyeshields, end bells, etc, it looks like Sears handed the tooling over to Paramount/Allegretti & Co and they commenced with the same cast iron designs for several years before re-tooling to the alloy versions in the early 60's. I would not be surprised if the early cast iron "blocks" shared the same motor structure as the prior Packard-made grinders. It would interesting if someone could take some pics and dimensions of their cast iron block components during a rebuild.

If it is confirmed that all cast iron versions have the same motor components, and different from later alloy versions, the decision should be made to either: a) include ALL the block-shaped grinders as "Block" grinders, or b) define all the cast-iron models of both manufacturers as "Pre-Block".

My vote will be for the latter if all the cast iron internals are the same (and different from alloy versions).
I agree, I think Sears had the design, specs, and probably tooling. They could have looked for low-cost supplier - like auto manufactures are doing.

It would be great if there was someone who knew (ie: worked on the design, etc ...), but it's likely there are few, if any, of those people still around. :(

It sure would be easier if we could just go by the model number, but as the little example michaelwolson posted of m-397.19330, there are obvious exceptions. And probable more 'skin-deep' ones as well.
 
Last edited:

EOC_Jason

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
11,388
Location
Bentonville, AR
Guys, I have a quick question on grinding stones and wire wheels. What size wheels are you using? I have a 6" wheel on now and it seems too small, granted it's lightly used. I have measured and a 7" wheel seems like it would easily fit but they don't have much for grit options. Anyone use the 7" wheels? Thanks for your help.

What is your HP? I believe 1/4HP & 1/3HP is 6", while 1/2HP & 3/4HP are 7"... 1HP might be 8"?

I bought some 7" wheels off eBay. I made the mistake of buying a 3-pk of various grits that were pretty cheap compared to buying nicer brands... The plastic bushings were junk and wouldn't stay in place, took forever to align & balance the wheels... I will never make that mistake again.

Buy Norton wheels, forget the other cheap ones. If you can't find a 7" just use a 6" as they are much more common and probably cheaper.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,189
Location
The Badlands
Guys, I have a quick question on grinding stones and wire wheels. What size wheels are you using? I have a 6" wheel on now and it seems too small, granted it's lightly used. I have measured and a 7" wheel seems like it would easily fit but they don't have much for grit options. Anyone use the 7" wheels? Thanks for your help.

What is your HP? I believe 1/4HP & 1/3HP is 6", while 1/2HP & 3/4HP are 7"... 1HP might be 8"?

I bought some 7" wheels off eBay. I made the mistake of buying a 3-pk of various grits that were pretty cheap compared to buying nicer brands... The plastic bushings were junk and wouldn't stay in place, took forever to align & balance the wheels... I will never make that mistake again.

Buy Norton wheels, forget the other cheap ones. If you can't find a 7" just use a 6" as they are much more common and probably cheaper.

At least some 1/2 HP used 7" wheels. Mine, designated "Commercial", gold crown label, has 7"wheels and guards to suit/
 

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,189
Location
The Badlands
Since there are so many similarities in the tool rests, eyeshields, end bells, etc, it looks like Sears handed the tooling over to Paramount/Allegretti & Co and they commenced with the same cast iron designs for several years before re-tooling to the alloy versions in the early 60's. .

I agree, I think Sears had the design, specs, and probably tooling. They could have looked for low-cost supplier - like auto manufactures are doing.

I don't believe Sears ever was an actual manufacturer, despite many implied advertising statements that they were. They contracted the products and sold under their name or their many trademarks (Craftsman, Dunlap, Etc...)

The Packard/Delco/Sunlight/ acquisitions/mergers, were long and convoluted,

Allegretti & Co & Paramount; Paramount (now Poulan), who continued the Delco model Block Grinders also had acquisitions going on.

The mergers, acquisitions, and possible tooling sales between companies, were between the manufacturers, and Sears simply made new contracts with new suppliers as needed.
 
Last edited:

exmaxima1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
6,339
Location
Midwest
I don't believe Sears ever was an actual manufacturer, despite many implied advertising statements that they were. They contracted the products and sold under their name or their many trademarks (Craftsman, Dunlap, Etc...)

Understood, but that doesn't preclude Sears from owning the tooling. Many companies (including mine) source various products from other manufacturers but buy the tooling to ensure exclusivity. When/if I move to a new vendor, it is not unusual to move the tooling to the new vendor. And in the case of castings, that is typically sourced independently and shipped to my vendor to utilize in my products. That way I own the tooling (or molds) and am free to shop various vendors for manufacturing.
 
Last edited:

drivesitfar

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
36,007
Location
Pacific Northwest
Ex, Doc, Outlaw & ALL: I think MB's block looks exactly like my round tops except for the badge which made me think about it being a PRE BLOCK.

personally i like the PRE BLOCKS maybe a bit better than the round tops cause i think they are both great grinders and i like the badge on the PRE BLOCKS better.

JasonEOC: thanks for the tips on buying smaller grinder wheels and QUALITY NORTON brand ones instead of what is on sale or the exact size wheels sent out of the factories.
 

Outlawmws

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
39,189
Location
The Badlands
Exmax. That is a possibility; I've just never heard/seen any verified cases of that with Sears. I know of few products that Sears carried you could not buy elsewhere under another name. Those that I have noted, when they ended production with Sears, it just ended. Something the producer didn't want to carry...

I have countless tools from Sears that I also have with another branding, if not more than one. Not saying it's not possible, but if it was done, it wasn't common.
 
Last edited:

maxwage

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Messages
85
Location
South Central, Indiana
fdb2a68349cc5045f869cc11d8ba3c6c.jpg

25$ out the door from local Pawnshop. A nice complement to my Wissota.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Attachments

  • fdb2a68349cc5045f869cc11d8ba3c6c.jpg
    fdb2a68349cc5045f869cc11d8ba3c6c.jpg
    680.6 KB · Views: 2

exmaxima1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
6,339
Location
Midwest
25$ out the door from local Pawnshop. A nice complement to my Wissota.

I know both are 1/3hp, but I'll bet the Wissota runs smoother. I have a Wissota E-6 (E-33) as well that I bought to use as a small buffer, and they are outstanding little machines. :thumbup:
 

BRWEIDEM

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
46
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Joined the club today. Found this 7", 3/4 HP, 397.19350 nearby. Didn't steal it but paid what I thought was a fair price. This is my first craftsman grinder, not sure if it is block, pre-block, or not even a block? Can anyone take a look and comment? Ive seen some pretty good looking resto's on this forum but this one is in great condition so I was considering just leaving it the way it is. Any way to date these grinders? Briefly took it apart but didn't see anything that resembles a date or date code. Thanks for your feedback.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4398.jpg
    IMG_4398.jpg
    146.4 KB · Views: 50
Last edited:

BRWEIDEM

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
46
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Glad you mentioned the bottom cover. While looking it over at home i noticed there is just a galvanized plate screwed into the bottom side. It struck me as weird and I wondered whether or not these grinders came with just a plate on the bottom or if there is supposed to be an actual cover. Based on the bends and cutouts it doesn't look homemade. Does anyone have a picture of the underside of one of these or a description of what is supposed to be there?
 

torqueman2002

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
6,139
Location
SE Michigan
Joined the club today. Found this 7", 3/4 HP, 397.19350 nearby. Didn't steal it but paid what I thought was a fair price. This is my first craftsman grinder, not sure if it is block, pre-block, or not even a block? Can anyone take a look and comment? Ive seen some pretty good looking resto's on this forum but this one is in great condition so I was considering just leaving it the way it is. Any way to date these grinders? Briefly took it apart but didn't see anything that resembles a date or date code. Thanks for your feedback.
Yup, that's a flat top Block.

Here are a couple pictures of the bottom cover.
FIP1080273.jpg


FIP1080272.jpg


:rocker:
 

BRWEIDEM

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
46
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Jason, Outlaw, Torque, thanks for the help. Pulled the bottom cover off again- no date stamp. You mention flat top block, where do these fit in the realm of block grinders? Is there any previous info posted on different styles of blocks and when they were produced?

Meantime, on the hunt for a second unit. I'm already addicted.
 

MissileBear

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
339
Location
Western NY
From what I can glean from that thread, the term "Block" grinder was in regards to the shape and the manufacturer was mainly noted as a frame in time. I don't get the impression that the prior manufacturer was even considered (or known), or it would surely have been included since the block shape is essentially the same.

Since there are so many similarities in the tool rests, eyeshields, end bells, etc, it looks like Sears handed the tooling over to Paramount/Allegretti & Co and they commenced with the same cast iron designs for several years before re-tooling to the alloy versions in the early 60's. I would not be surprised if the early cast iron "blocks" shared the same motor structure as the prior Packard-made grinders. It would interesting if someone could take some pics and dimensions of their cast iron block components during a rebuild.

If it is confirmed that all cast iron versions have the same motor components, and different from later alloy versions, the decision should be made to either: a) include ALL the block-shaped grinders as "Block" grinders, or b) define all the cast-iron models of both manufacturers as "Pre-Block".

My vote will be for the latter if all the cast iron internals are the same (and different from alloy versions).

I might dig into this over the next few days - unfortunately I only have a true 1/3 HP and a 1/2 HP block to compare to (sold the 1/4 HP flat top a while ago).
 

exmaxima1

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
6,339
Location
Midwest
I might dig into this over the next few days - unfortunately I only have a true 1/3 HP and a 1/2 HP block to compare to (sold the 1/4 HP flat top a while ago).

No need to check any block grinder (round or flat-top types) with an alloy chassis, as they definitely use a smaller motor structure than the older cast iron versions. What I wanted to know was if the early "397" cast iron grinders versions utilized the same guts as the prior "115" designs.

What I now see as a possibility was that early "397" was Delco, and they may have taken over the tooling and molds from Packard ("115") in the late 50's. And then Paramount/Allegretti & Co bought Delco---and retained their "397" code---but redesigned the model line to all new alloy versions with smaller guts. If this is the case, the term BLOCK grinder should not be based strictly on the mfr code (since 2 companies used the 397), but instead to differentiate BLOCK and PRE-BLOCK based on whether it is cast iron or alloy framed.
 
To avoid these ads, REGISTER NOW!
Top Bottom