OP
lilscorpion
Well-known member
Agreed. I really like them in the same plane as well. Clean copper adds a dimension that the conduit just doesn’t. Starts to feel like art even. You and I are thinking alike on the stainless flex tube. I’ll post an update in a minute.I like how good the copper pipes look in the same plane.
Your work on the conduit looks so clean that it makes the copper transition really stand out (in the wrong way).
On the upper water line tee, you could point it straight up and then transition to a threaded stainless water heater hose to make the 180* turn down. By routing it behind the pipes, it might help it blend into the background a bit. (You could always use malleable copper tubing instead, but I think the stainless hose would look better.)
Alternatively, they make a "compression crossover coupling" but it doesn't look any better (and they aren't cheap).
https://www.mcmaster.com/products/couplings/shape~crossover/
I’ve been looking for U’s and can’t believe it’s not a fitting that exists. I suspect that’s because hydraulic pressure doesn’t require subtle transitions and two 90’s are cheaper to make and accomplish the same function. Just a guess tho.Without knowing the spacing between the pipes, but maybe another option is to have a Tee pointing up and then make a U shape turn with copper tubing and fittings that will angle the drop between the two lines. Just a thought if a street 90 doesn't fit in the tight area.











































