jrlp
Well-known member
Well, my Dewalt 20v setup has disappeared. It served me well. I had the non-brushless hammer drill and 1/4 hex impact.
I used the impact the most, by far. I would use square drive arbors on it, and it had enough oomph to remove lug nuts on most cars. I had developed a system to pretty much use it instead of an air ratchet. Almost all the work I do on cars, I would use the impact for.
Everything from valve cover gaskets, suspension work, lugnuts, pulling transmissions, differential work (where it flat-out excels), and interior work.
Ever since I made a nice set of jigs to plasma cut small circular holes, I haven't drilled very much since then. I do use uni-bits a bunch though.
Anyhow, I've always been a Milwaukee guy, and have had M12 before, when they first came out with their first m12 tools, getting the 3/8" drill and screwdriver set. I loved it. I still have their little m12 radio I run off an a/c adapter. It is a flat-out amazing little radio.
So, I'm at the place where I get to choose what system to go with. With the new brushless systems in tools, I'm pretty excited. I've done brushless motors in r/c cars since quite literally the very beginning. Paying way too much money for ModelTech brushless systems that were just rebadged Hacker junk lol.
Anyhow, the DeWalt 20v impact I had did 1400 in/lb of torque (117 ft/lb). The m12 brushless impact does a little less, at 1200 in/lb of torque (100 ft/lb), and probably weighs at least 1/2 pound less.
Don't get me wrong, I have air powered impacts covered, but lugging around a big impact and air hose on the inside of a nice car is not going to happen.
I've been rambling here for a while.. Guess I just want to hear stories of people who's chosen one or the other, and if they have regrets.
I want to go m12, it's lighter, cheaper, and has tons of power. But, the m18 has much more power but is heavier. I won't be drilling 1/2" or thicker steel or anything like that, I have a big 3/4" hole hawg and a big Milwaukee Mag drill as well, and a plasma, so.. I may be able to get away with the m12 drill.
I used the impact the most, by far. I would use square drive arbors on it, and it had enough oomph to remove lug nuts on most cars. I had developed a system to pretty much use it instead of an air ratchet. Almost all the work I do on cars, I would use the impact for.
Everything from valve cover gaskets, suspension work, lugnuts, pulling transmissions, differential work (where it flat-out excels), and interior work.
Ever since I made a nice set of jigs to plasma cut small circular holes, I haven't drilled very much since then. I do use uni-bits a bunch though.
Anyhow, I've always been a Milwaukee guy, and have had M12 before, when they first came out with their first m12 tools, getting the 3/8" drill and screwdriver set. I loved it. I still have their little m12 radio I run off an a/c adapter. It is a flat-out amazing little radio.
So, I'm at the place where I get to choose what system to go with. With the new brushless systems in tools, I'm pretty excited. I've done brushless motors in r/c cars since quite literally the very beginning. Paying way too much money for ModelTech brushless systems that were just rebadged Hacker junk lol.
Anyhow, the DeWalt 20v impact I had did 1400 in/lb of torque (117 ft/lb). The m12 brushless impact does a little less, at 1200 in/lb of torque (100 ft/lb), and probably weighs at least 1/2 pound less.
Don't get me wrong, I have air powered impacts covered, but lugging around a big impact and air hose on the inside of a nice car is not going to happen.
I've been rambling here for a while.. Guess I just want to hear stories of people who's chosen one or the other, and if they have regrets.
I want to go m12, it's lighter, cheaper, and has tons of power. But, the m18 has much more power but is heavier. I won't be drilling 1/2" or thicker steel or anything like that, I have a big 3/4" hole hawg and a big Milwaukee Mag drill as well, and a plasma, so.. I may be able to get away with the m12 drill.
a bit, but I suppose there's people who need them.
