Oldtuleguy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 10,459
Of course, that assumes the words were typed out, not just a pic, or a link to catalog.GJ has an excellent search feature. It's the magnifying glass icon, found in the upper right. Lots of options, including just a thread
Of course. A prerequisite that any search function would have, hence my constant hectoring on guys who just post photos. We need a new emoji that is the exact opposite of the famous one...Of course, that assumes the words were typed out, not just a pic, or a link to catalog.
Whoa...see post #2036 and #2037 if you're referring to me. My inquiry was originally about a search query. The picture was a follow-thru to show what I was searching for. But I do understand what your saying...Of course. A prerequisite that any search function would have, hence my constant hectoring on guys who just post photos. We need a new emoji that is the exact opposite of the famous one...
THIS POST IS WORTHLESS WITHOUT TEXT! INCLUDE MAKE, BRAND, AND MODEL NUMBERS!
Well said. The database is only as good as the info input into it. You get out what you put in.Of course. A prerequisite that any search function would have, hence my constant hectoring on guys who just post photos. We need a new emoji that is the exact opposite of the famous one...
THIS POST IS WORTHLESS WITHOUT TEXT! INCLUDE MAKE, BRAND, AND MODEL NUMBERS!
THIS POST IS WORTHLESS WITHOUT TEXT! INCLUDE MAKE, BRAND, AND MODEL NUMBERS
hoa...see post #2036 and #2037 if you're referring to me. My inquiry was originally about a search query. The picture was a follow-thru to show what I was searching for. But I do understand what your saying...
Well said. The database is only as good as the info input into it. You get out what you put in.
I wasn't referring to you. I wasn't referring to anyone in particular, or even this thread in particular. It is a widespread and rampant problem.Whoa...see post #2036 and #2037 if you're referring to me.
Well said! This is why I loathe many face book enthusiast groups. While they may be good for fun quick posts or showing off photos, they are worthless when it comes to research or search functions in general. Forums like this are much better suited for collecting and research if we all put the time in to make it a worthwhile resource for everyone involved.I wasn't referring to you. I wasn't referring to anyone in particular, or even this thread in particular. It is a widespread and rampant problem.
Many users - including some of our most frequent users, do not like to type any information about the tools they are posting. Some of this is laziness, some of it is modern instantaneous culture, and some of it just preference. People just have different approaches to what GJ is and how to use it. To many, it's just show, with little motivation to tell, let alone tell in detail, and they move on. The problem is, so does the site! Very quickly!
Because of the structure (chronological forum) it can feel like Groundhog Day around here sometimes where you're seeing the same tools and having the same conversation over and over again, because the discussions with research and references and resolutions are buried. That is not conducive for using the site like a knowledge base. Efforts to slow it down and provide some structure that resists the constant renewal (such as the Sticky) have had some impact, but being able to find data inside older content on threads with the Search function absolutely depends on text.
That's why posts like, "Here are some screwdrivers," or "These wrenches just arrived in the mail," are worthless! They have little value to begin with - even if they're on a brand specific thread, they have no value after a day or two, and after a month or two, those great photos of those great tools that someone thought worth posting may as well have not existed at all. They will be nearly impossible to find later without blowing a synapse.
And by the way - the Search function will not find text marked up in photos or photo filenames. It only works on text inside the post.



Private Lugnutz said:"...the Search function will not find text marked up in photos or photo filenames. It only works on text inside the post."
testingpummel this horse
Sorry Lugz, I just can't picture this...Of course. A prerequisite that any search function would have, hence my constant hectoring on guys who just post photos. We need a new emoji that is the exact opposite of the famous one...
THIS POST IS WORTHLESS WITHOUT TEXT! INCLUDE MAKE, BRAND, AND MODEL NUMBERS!
I was referring to this popular emoji...Sorry Lugz, I just can't picture this...


Pretty sure he was joking.
Pretty sure when Lugz gets the bit in his teeth, he sometimes misses the subtleties (or the subtle tease!).Pretty sure he was joking.
Makes sense, King **** box would have evidence of an oval logo on the lid.
Have you actually ever seen a K-D box? I reviewed their catalogs and only have seen loose sockets. I have an original stock 1/4" NAPA set with a K-D spinner here but it's from that whole K-D/ Easco conglomerate period and the box (unmarked) was likely importedMakes sense, KD box would have evidence of an oval logo on the lid.

K D I'm referring to is King ****. Have edited my post.
Looks to be only slightly wider than the plomb challenger box. Pretty skinny for sure!Yeah that's a skinnyassed box! Has it been blasted, powdercoated, repainted, or what? Hard to tell.